A silver fork with animal hoof finial, from Byzantium (possibly Syria), 4th century AD
The youngest member of the flatware family, the fork has only become an essential utensil in the last couple hundred years — after all, who needs a fork when you have fingers, aka the perfect tools for picking up morsels? Many historians see a parallel between the rise of the fork and the rise of civilization. You can also read it as an index of attitudes toward hygiene and luxury. So…what the fork?
A rare Roman spoon and fork combo in silver and gold, 3rd century AD
Forks have been around at least since ancient times, but these were usually two-tined (unlike the above example), and used mostly for cooking and serving food. For eating, Westerners were content with their fingers, spoons for soup, and knives, which were used to spear food on the plate and put it in the mouth. It seems that table forks were almost uniquely found in the Near East — Byzantium, or modern-day Syria and Iran.
Gerard David, The Marriage at Cana, c. 1500, with nary a fork in sight
So it's not surprising that the first appearance of forks in the West was in Venice, the European bridge to the East and terminus of the Silk Road. The "patient zero" of forks was apparently an 11th-century Byzantine princess who married a Venetian doge and brought golden forks as part of her dowry. The Venetians were appalled when they saw her using her fork, seeing it as spiting God: one clergyman said, "God in his wisdom has provided man with natural forks — his fingers. Therefore it is an insult to him to substitute artificial metallic forks for them when eating." When the princess died two years later, the Venetian church saw it as God's punishment for the pride and vanity and "excessive delicacy" she displayed in her use of forks.
My guess is there was a little more to this than the simple equation of forks and vanity. A political marriage would have been fraught under any circumstances, with factions pro and against the choice of bride, and a marriage to Byzantium would certainly have had its opposition. Censuring the princess as being somehow 'against God' would have been good politics for all sorts of Venetians who had their own interests to advance.
But whatever the underlying motives, the harsh reaction to the fork persisted for centuries, and the utensil was apparently tainted by its association with Eastern decadence. In Europe, its use was limited to sticky or syrupy foods, like fruits cooked in wine.
A lavish rock crystal and silver fork from Germany, c. 1500, used for special fruits and other delicacies
By the 16th century, though, we know that forks were more commonly found on the dinner tables of wealthy Italians, because that is when the Florentine Catherine de' Medici brought forks to France when she moved there to marry King Henry II. It took Henry's courtiers a while to figure out how to use the things without spilling — food was always falling through the two wide tines — but since Italy was the style capital of the world at the time (the Renaissance), forks began to gain acceptance, though many saw their use as pretentious. We also know of at least one fork-using Spanish nobleman, Don Alonso de Leiva, whose ship sank during the Armada in 1588. Divers later recovered many forks among Alonso's sunken treasure, all straight-tined, but some with as many as five tines.
An Italian steel and ivory fork from the 17th century
In the early 17th century, an Englishman named Thomas Coryate published a travelogue of his tour through Europe, where he saw Italians using forks. Coryate admired the way forks kept one's dirty hands off the food — not as a way of keeping the food off one's hands:
The reason of this their curiosity is because the Italian cannot endure by any means to have his dish touched by fingers, seeing that all men's fingers are not alike cleane. Hereupon I myselfe thought to imitate the Italian fashion by this forked cutting of meate, not only while I was in Italy, but also in Germany, and often-times in England since I came home.
This point drives home the fact that people were pretty dirty back then. Medical 'wisdom' at the time dictated that one's pores should be clogged with dirt in order to prevent the Plague from seeping in. (Doctors actually believed that water could be deadly.) Etiquette books from the Renaissance reminded people not to blow one's nose on the tablecloth, but to use one's fingers instead — this during a time when people shared common fingerbowls for rinsing fingers between courses. So once ideas about hygiene started to change, the fork became a lot more attractive.
A French cutlery set, with its original carrying case, c. 1550-1600Coryate's travelogue seems to mark a turning point in rates of fork acceptance in England, and the earliest known silver fork made in England was created in 1632. By the end of the 17th century, many people across Europe carried their own cutlery sets — including forks — around with them in a special case. Around the same time, hygiene was rehabilitated as an important aspect of healthiness. Now, forks could be seen as a way of keeping both hands and food clean. Some historians note that many men rejected forks as being too effeminate — until long lace ruffly cuffs became fashionable and made forks even more convenient; interesting to think about a time when lace ruffles were considered more obviously masculine than fork usage.
Coral and Gold fork, c. 1590-1610Another important factor gets back to our Byzantine princess and her deadly sins: pride and vanity. As the wealthy began using forks, the started having them made out of precious metals and materials. Forks, like other objects, increasingly became vehicles for conspicuous consumption. And once that happens, everyone has to have them.
In the 18th century, people figured out that curving the fork and adding tines could make it easier to use on elusive foods like peas and beans. Meanwhile, the rise of forks meant the decline of knives. Louis XIV made sharply pointed knives illegal, presumably to curb violence (he might have been a little paranoid after the nobility revolted against him) and the new rounded table knives, fashionable everywhere as soon as they appeared at the French court, were totally useless when it came to spearing food.
By the 19th century, industrialization and the rise of the middle class meant that forks were no longer limited to an aristocratic elite. Now everyone could have their own flatware — and enough to offer their guests matching sets at dinner parties. Two-tined forks were no longer in vogue; now forks had anywhere from three to six tines — unless you were in America or a similar backwater. When Charles Dickens toured the U.S. in 1842, he noted that even the most polite Americans were still eating with knives and two-tined forks. But European civility was in vogue, and so the fork soon became standardized as the most important piece of flatware.
Victorian Toasting ForksIn fact, the Victorians found it so important that they invented scores of different kinds of forks — Victorian tables groaned under the abundance of unnecessary flatware, a different fork for nearly every kind of food! With our current cultural (and economic?) preference for casual dining, most of these have gone the way of the two-tined fork, but next time you pull meat out of a lobster claw with a tiny fork, you can thank the Victorians for their ingenuity!
So in tracing the history of the fork, we can trace the different Western attitudes toward cleanliness (Bad! No, good!), towards delicacy (Pretentious! No, civilized!), and towards conspicuous consumption (Ungodly! No, pretty great!). We can also see some general trends of material culture across the last millennium, especially the leap from virtuosic, expensive, one-of-a-kind pieces on royal tabletops in the Renaissance, to mass-produced quantity-over-quality pieces that emulate those European royals by the 19th century. Will you ever look at a fork the same way again?
Images: 14th century Byzantine silver fork at the Cleveland Museum of Art; 2 Roman fork/spoon at the Metropolitan Museum of Art; 3 Gerard David, The Marriage at Cana, c. 1500, at the Louvre, via Web Gallery of Art; 4 German sweetmeat fork, c. 1500, at the Metropolitan Museum of Art; 5 Italian fork at the Met; 6 French cutlery set, c. 1550-1600, from the Victoria and Albert; 7 A coral and gold fork, c. 1590-1610, via larsdatter; 8 Victorian Toasting Forks via Redelf.
Sources: I love Suzanne von Drachenfels' book, The Art of the Table, and got a lot of good information from her. Online, Robyyan Tor d'Elandris has a lot of great primary sources, as does the Hospitality Guild.
Comments (21)
Thanks, Anna!
Very interesting and the pics are great, Any idea why or how we started to use forks differently from ...say the British?
Thanks.
Sassy C- I read about that recently. Apparently the current American way of holding and using a fork is also the original European way. Colonists brought this style over to North America and kept it, while Europeans gradually stopped switching the knife and fork between hands.
Anna- great article! I love these history pieces you guys do- please keep them up!
Another recent fork post for fellow trivia geeks: http://gizmodo.com/5817044/the-devil-didnt-invent-the-fork
This was so interesting! Great post.
@ SASSYC and CATIAELIZABETH -- I've heard a lot of different theories:
- Constantly holding your knife was seen as aggressive, so the style of putting it down was developed
- Families didn't have sharp knives for all, so the same knife or knives were shared through a meal, which meant putting it down when you weren't using it
- European lower class often used spoons instead of forks, so they had to load the spoon with the knife. Aristrocrats held on the other method because it was slower and more polite at formal tables
The random stuff I've heard goes on and on like this. Clearly some of them are myths or inventions. I'd love to know what's true.
One of the most interesting posts ever! Seriously! Very cool to know the history and see those exquisite pieces of, dare I say, art.
Very interesting and I love the old forks in the pictures. Thanks.
Excellent post! I love the historical articles on AT!
so sick of chalkboards and chalkboard paint on everything
lol posted that on the wrong thread, damn you new layout!
Seriously, Anna, that was fabulous! Love, love, love the historical articles on AT. Keep 'em coming.
I don't have anything to say about this, but just wanted to indicate that I would like more posts in this vein. :)
(Though I guess the retrospect posts are exclusively Anna's demesne anyway....)
What a great post - thanks for the drive-by history. And a good reminder that styles change, and what once could be seen as "natural" now seems unthinkable (and vice versa). It's a good reminder for people who spend a lot of time thinking about and critiquing styles.
Thanks again for another great post Anna. And I particularly liked "interesting to think about a time when lace ruffles were considered more obviously masculine than fork usage" - beautifully put!
Fantastic post, thank you.
More of these kind of posts!
Very interesting post! I won't look at my flatware the same way again.
I have to point out a correction, however. "It seems that table forks were almost uniquely found in the Near East — Byzantium, or modern-day Syria and Iran." Byzantium is modern-day Turkey (Byzantium -> Constantinople -> Istanbul), and Syria and Iran don't share a border...
Fantastic history and, I have to add, extremely well-written. I didn't expect to be so enthralled by the story of forks! If there were blog awards for great writing this should get one. Also good to know the history, and I had no idea it was so recent. :) Next time I go to Ren Faire I'll leave my fork at home.
So glad to see this interesting history here -- I join the grateful chorus! I love the bit about the (Catholic) Church's opposition to the fork....