In the words of Milburg Francisco Mansfield, an early-20th-century historian, "Turning back the pages of history one finds that each people, each century, possessed its own specious variety of garden." Like everything else in home design, gardens follow trends, and two of the most long-running competitors for gardeners' attention have been English and French gardens.
While the development of the French garden occurred over a long period of time, it reached its clearest expression in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries under Louis XIV and Louis XV, and the most famous example of this type of garden style can be seen in the gardens of Versailles, designed by André Le Nôtre. The French garden is situated on a flat terrain and has a strong symmetrical axis, usually centering on the house. "Goose-foot" patterns of paths radiate from circular features, and when viewed from above, clear patterns of scrollwork or geometrical shapes can be discerned.
The French garden has been analyzed as as part of the period's political culture. Louis XIV, the first French absolutist monarch, imposed his will not only on his people, but also on nature through the symbolic ordering of his gardens. By manipulating the landscape, nature could be made rational, regular, and structured. Those who partook of the gardens witnessed defined hedgerows and far-reaching sight lines, and their physical movement was restricted by distinct paths and designated leisure areas. Aside from its status as a political symbol, the French garden also came to serve as an intellectual one. In the Enlightenment, new ideas in math and science could be spatially implemented, and the privileging of rationality was made tangible in these outdoor spaces.
The English garden, which came into being in the early eighteenth century but reached its height with the Romantic movement in the 1790s and early nineteenth century, highlighted the variety of nature and its capacity to inspire the imagination. It usually included ponds or a lake, wilder foliage, imitation ruins and grottos (often overrun by this wilder foliage), and expanses of rolling lawns and groves of trees. Visitors to an English garden were invited to wander its lawns, and the gardens were conceived as spaces of natural fantasy rather than geometric constructions of nature.
Capability Brown, one of the major figures in the development of the English landscape garden, described his task as a garden designer as akin to that of the poet: "Here I put a comma, there, when it's necessary to cut the view, I put a parenthesis; there I end it with a period and start on another theme." The English garden was intended as a creative space, in which one could exercise the imagination and commune with the wilder, more romantic elements of nature, and its creators and proponents often valorized the idyllic pastoral. By the late eighteenth century, the trend of the English garden had spread, and famously, Marie Antoinette had a small English garden created at Versailles, where she would dress in simple muslin garments and milk cows.
The influence of these two styles — the strictly controlled, regimented landscape and the wilder, more imaginative landscape — can still be seen in contemporary gardens, and it's arguable that our current garden style seeks to mesh the two tendencies, formal and informal, into a single area. Do your tastes run to the structured, decorative side of the French garden, or to the more romantic, abundant growth of the English garden? Or somewhere in between?
For more reading:
• Chandra Mukerji, Territorial Ambitions and the Gardens of Versailles
• Milburg Francisco Mansfield, Royal Palaces and Parks of France
• Mark Laird, The Flowering of the Landscape Garden: English Pleasure Grounds, 1720-1800
• Sarah Jane Downing: The English Pleasure Garden: 1660-1860
(Images: 1. Mansfield on Project Gutenberg, 2. Gardening at the Edge, 3. French Provincial Furniture, 4. Adrienne dePitera, 5. American Gardening)






Nomade Express Slee...
Why vs.? 'And' would suffice. They are both beautiful designs.
I suppose until I have a large staff to trim my parterre for my own garden I'll use a more relaxed english style. However in a public garden I can enjoy either :)
They are both gorgeous. If I lived in an Agatha Christie novel and could hire a gardener, I think I'd have some of each.
For a fabulous example of an English garden, (and a gorgeous house) check out Great Dixter http://www.greatdixter.co.uk/index.htm . I've only ever visited once but it was a gorgeous early summer day, perfect sunny weather (the kind that happens about once every few years in England!) and the gardens were just perfect.
Who cares! As long as someone else is going to do all that work, I'd be happy with either :D
Lovely post! I didn't know about the political symbolism of the French gardens! very illustrative! My past house had a garden where I created a combination of the two styles: there were lush trees everywhere but among them, we had designated spaces to seat, to move. There was also a geometrical component in the small flower boxes I made, which followed patterns. So I guess my gardening style was pretty eclectic.
Interesting post. Like most, I love both design options. Versailles and Stowe are both equally enchanting. It is also interesting that most people like both, considering they have such very opposite styles/designs. I think that loving a garden is a bit universal and transcends taste to some degree.
I am so glad I live near a botanic garden.
Hey, what about italian gardens? :-) http://www.gardenaesthetics.com/Lante4.jpg
interesting considering the trend in the 2000's to have highly stylized gardens in contemporary English and Australian home reno shows..... what does it say? Is that trend the inheritor of the French style..and therefore indicative of a need for control? Or is it visual laziness and lack of imagination that it is describing.
Et in Arcadia ego.
I found the Versailles gardens to be beautiful, but also impressive and intimidating. I guess that was the point. If I had to choose a style for myself, I'd probably lean toward English Gardens, because you can let nature do some of the work for you. I like spending time in a garden, but don't have much of a green thumb myself.
Or the American garden: straight beds of identical annuals (usually violas or impatiens, but sometimes begonias or petunias) in big blocks of color or stripes, in front of a bed of perennial liriope that is periodically decapitated by weed whackers. Sometimes accented by a backdrop of ever-blooming roses (magenta-colored) or a tall array of colors with blooms and foliage conspicuously at odds with the colors of everything else in the bed.
Tall array of cannas. Cannas!
Love this post! Great job on the clarification on the English approach of Capability Brown--there is still a lot of intent and planning in the English style--but the experience is meant to FEEL wild and unstructured to the visitor. Google 'Stourhead England' for some great pix of English garden on a lovely estate that has all the trappings...follies, grottos, ramble, ha-has...etc. I want to stroll there--right now.
I dislike French gardens, I guess because they look overly structured. My life is full of chaos (LOL) and such design just goes against the grain of my whole being.
English gardens, OTOH, are quite charming - that is, if somewhat maintained. Personally I don't like all kinds of plants and colours thrown together (regardless whether it mimics something found in nature) - I prefer colours that complement each other.
Having said that, my current house had a sort of an English garden at the front when I bought it. That is, if you looked at it from a distance. Upon a closer look, you would discover that it was a bunch of grasses and masses of day lilies (the ordinary orange variety found in every ditch) and lots, lots of weeds.
I made a resolution to rip it all out and after a few half-a$$ attempts I suceeded 2 years ago. Boy, I would have never guessed what a struggle it would be to get rid of the day lilies and of the yuccas. But it's done, and now I have a low-maintenance garden with japanese maples and evergreens. There is still a slope that needs to be finished this year but I am quite happy with I turned it into. It took me from May till October and it exceeded even my wildest estimates about how big a job it would be but it was worth it.
I will have an English garden with climbing roses crawling over half-delapidated trellises when I retire and move to Britain - I love the rainy, misty weather.
I definitely prefer the English style, though I appreciate aspects of the formal French style. Much of what is possible in one's own garden comes from the climate one lives in. I come from lush, England-like regions--New York and New England--and from a family of gardeners influenced by that style. But I live in the high desert Southwest, where the cottage garden (a smaller version of the dramatic Romantic English garden) is a high-maintenance, water-sucking luxury. The plants that thrive in this environment love lots of sun and poor soil (certain grasses, cacti, dry-land perennials and trees) and tend to be more conducive to formal styles--or perhaps the spare Japanese style more than the hyper-controlled French style.
Microclimates within a given property also make different garden styles possible. I have a huge yard that was largely full of weeds and dead or dying plants when we moved in. I opted to divide the space into a small, partially shaded patio area where I could do a modified version of a cottage style garden. The hot sunny back area has gravel paths, boulders, and defined plantings, emphasizing the interesting shapes and textures of native and related species.
So through necessity I have come develop an appreciation for the formality of controlled styles. It would be interesting to know how much climate affected the French garden style.
While I don't have an outdoor garden of my own (ironic as a landscape designer), we learned about all sorts of gardens, from garden beginnings Islamic (rills & paradise) to American gardens and everything in between, including French, Italian (water gardens) & English. While the English style is what most people think of gardens, outdoor spaces continues to evolve and become reinvented.
If I had my own outdoor space, I think it'd have pretty clean lines, lots of varying foliage and some flowers, but more of the times with maybe a vertical garden and a little water fountain, not quite the modern Japanese aesthetic (which can be too stark and cold), but not as fussy as English gardens. And in terms of being a gardener, yes, English gardens are much easier on the knees and backs.
Meadow garden = no mowing.
Interesting...
Let's do Japanese and Chinese gardens next time!
i laughed a little at the garden layouts at the top. it might as well be type A, type B personalities. my heart flutters at the thought of an English garden. i'm working to make my yard more like a cottage garden. all those small, evenly spaced plants just leave room for weeds to occupy the space, and i don't want to spend hours every day weeding. i'd rather have full, lush flowers filling in all that space.
My preference is for the English garden most definitely! I love the wild, colorful and unstructured feel of them. I don't find them fussy at all. In fact, I've actually adapted the style to accomodate not only my cottage style home but the arid southwest climate where I live. And yes, it can be done despite the challenging weather. I've made plenty of mistakes and I'm not a landscape professional either, but I do have a passion for gardening and for beauty. We've been transforming my urbanscape for years. I even have a spot for native wildflowers, which my sourpuss neighbor doesn't appreciate. Personally I'd love to rip out every blade of grass too, but since I live with someone who feels differently than I do it is a compromise. It is work, but I think I prefer it to working inside. It's also nice to know that our hardwork seems to be appreciated at least by a few people besides us as every spring we notice yard gawkers stopping by to point. If they are inspired well that's lovely to know.
I like both but the French style wins by just a little. I'm a city girl, not a fan of wildness unless its just trees since I'm from Vancouver. I'm used to that.
I saw a house in Vogue (or some other fashion magazine) a while ago where the very wealthy owner of the home had the landscaper do both. The areas closest to the house were in the French style and as the property stretch out past a gate and steps, it became wild and similar to the English gardens here. It was so beautiful and I was very impressed by the idea that you can have everything (if you have the money). I also remember the write-up because the landscaper was an equally beautiful and wealthy woman who does landscaping for fun. Oh, to be rich with very good taste.