Making cover art must be challenging. Not only does it have to draw an audience to the book, but the graphics themselves must represent both the subject and the feeling of the story. Take The Great Gatsby — the artist of this classic cover merged the romantic glamour of the upper class setting with the longing and angst of the lovelorn characters. The quirky cover of A Clockwork Orange is a fun nod to its futuristic setting and rebellious tone.
Whether you've read the books or not (and I suggest you do), these covers stand alone as art.
(Images: 1. Face Out Books, 2.Book Cover Archive, 3. Flavorwire. 4. The Literary Man, 5. Random House, 6.Amazon, 7.Time, 8.New York Times, 9.Amazon, 10. Amazon)











Ercol Bar Stool
I think Franco's cover is atrocious.
I am a biased librarian but I love book covers as art. Realized I don't have any in my house framed though! Need to fix that. Love the idea down the road of having a library/formal dining room and favorite book covers displayed on the walls. My favorite is also Catcher in the Rye.....BUT it's a different one - it's that wonderful simple red cover with the gold lettering. I collect them. Have to buy one if I am lucky enough to spot.
@Darling_Aesthete Why?
love the Dry cover. i love the idea of using framed covers on a wall …
Wow. Have you ever tried to read Franco's stories? It does not qualify as 'great literature.' He's an awful writer. Awful. Terrible. Boring. Not publish-worthy. It's such a shame that he was given publication and so much attention because he's a Hollywood heartthrob, when there are so many talented writers (who put time, effort, and attention in to their work - which Franco clearly does not) that don't get a break. And it looks like the artist put as much attention into the cover art for this book as Franco put into his stories.
Franco as great literature? Literature, sure. Great...well, I'm sure there's much room for debate.