apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Corded Phones: More Efficient than Cordless
Boston

973080455_a3bb824387_o.jpg

Recently we blogged about a company called Old Phone Works which refurbishes vintage corded phones. It turns out that not only are these phones good looking, they're also easier on your energy bill than your cordless phones...

 
 

Our current issue of Metropolitan Home reports that "tests revealed they (corded phones) use just a trace amount of electricity through the phone line, as opposed to the cordless variety, which consumes two to three watts just sitting in the dock."

Just another reason to bring our 1980's fire engine red phone out of storage and into circulation. We've done so before but the ring is shockingly loud...

pic: Adella_hime's flickr photostream

>>To All AT Boston Posts

Tags

GREEN IDEAS, Boston, Old Phone Works

Related Links

Share

Comments (10)

I have an old rotary phone and the sound quality is amazing!

posted by everydaycraftygoodness on August 29th 2008 at 4:47am
view everydaycraftygoodness's profile

I have an old Panasonic 2-line office phone from the the 1990s. There are times when the other end is actually too loud. During the blackout I was the only one of my friends and family that could make phone calls. I have a cordless somewhere but I never use it. I got tired of worrying about low battery life in the middle of a conversation.

posted by MeWindow on August 29th 2008 at 5:09am
view MeWindow's profile

I agree that corded phones sound better... While is it true that a cordless phone uses more energy than a corded one, the amount of energy saved over a cordless phone is also pretty negligible.

Lets do some math... If a cordless phone uses 3 watts of power and electricity is measured in watt hours, then the cordless phone uses 72 watt hours a day (3x24). A kilowatt hour of electricity in New York City (among the highest rates in the country) is .18 per kilowatt hour. At that rate, your phone uses a single kilowatt of power every 13.9 days or $4.73 per year in power.

I think the luxury of not having a cord is worth paying less than five dollars a year for.

posted by Devyn on August 29th 2008 at 5:16am
view Devyn's profile

i keep a corded phone around because when the shit hits the fan, cell phones and cordless phones won't be very helpful. i say this in jest, but like...during the nyc blackout a few summers ago, having my corded phone meant i could still talk to the world! my cordless phone and my brother's cell were both out of the commission.

posted by kdkaboom on August 29th 2008 at 5:29am
view kdkaboom's profile

Although the FCC has made it illegal, some modified scanners can pick up older analog cell phone frequencies and older cordless phone frequencies. This means that if you have an older generation cordless phone, a nosy neighbor with a modified scanner (and no life) can possibly eavesdrop your conversation.

With any of the newer cordless phones or cell phones, this isn't theoretically possible -- but with a corded phone, it's absolutely guaranteed to be impossible.

posted by lightspeed on August 29th 2008 at 5:30am
view lightspeed's profile

I have an old olive green rotary phone I use in the basement. I keep thinking I'm going to bring it upstairs and put it in my kitchen. Besides looking cool, it sounds great. When you lose power, you can still call out on your corded phone.

posted by Mrs.B on August 29th 2008 at 5:45am
view Mrs.B's profile

Hmm. I rarely use a home phone, I mean, I don't even have an home phone LINE (don't feel like paying $5/mo for something I literally never use). But I think having a vintage (and working) corded phone around would be neat. They look cute and would make a nice little dècor piece near the entry way, AND they'd be functional in an emergency. Granted without paying for a line I wouldn't be able to call anyone except 9-1-1. :)

posted by sparkle on August 29th 2008 at 5:48am
view sparkle's profile

oh I need to get one, there sure are some cute antique phones.

posted by Lizzykewl on August 29th 2008 at 8:32am
view Lizzykewl's profile

unfortunately, the building I live in disrupts the cell phone signal. I, and my bank account, wish I didn't need both a cell phone and a land line.

I have a cordless phone and a corded phone. the cordless is nice, but the batteries drain so quickly. the corded is huge and slightly inconvenient, but I've never lost a call and the sound is great.

posted by lcg on August 29th 2008 at 5:16pm
view lcg's profile

Corded phones are essential for power losses. I'll never be without one.

posted by madampince on August 29th 2008 at 7:41pm
view madampince's profile

Feeds

RSS icon Boston

+ City Feeds