apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Thomas Jefferson's Alcove Bed

4-8-08alcovebed.jpg

As a kid visiting my grandma in Virginia, I saw just about every Jeffersonian landmark in the area. She lived down the road from Poplar Forest, Jefferson's summer home, and I developed an early appreciation for the third president's sense of style. At both Poplar Forest and Monticello, one of the most memorable design features (and a great small space solution) is the alcove bed...

A self-taught architect, Jefferson designed his own homes, and included the necessary dimensions for alcove beds in the plans. Placing the bed in the center of the room, flanked by two supports, opened up the floor plan and allowed light and air to flow through both the bedroom and dressing room. For more examples of Jefferson's style, visit the Monticello photo gallery.

Photo: Jefferson's Bedchamber at Monticello

Comments (20)

It's a great use of space. But would be even better curtained off.

posted by Comicgeek on 2008-04-08 18:21:49
view Comicgeek's profile

Ahh nothing like a nap in your alcove bed with the breeze blowing through those great windows carrying the voices of the slaves toiling... Romantic. Seriously, what is this crap and why is it on this site?

posted by sherry2 on 2008-04-08 18:50:16
view sherry2's profile

I must have missed the non-existent nostalgia for slavery in the above post.

posted by lindenen on 2008-04-08 18:59:36
view lindenen's profile

I actually liked Monticello a lot: it reminded me so much of Palladian villasfrom the area around Venice. I liked the rooms colors better than Mt. Vernon

posted by Francesca on 2008-04-08 19:13:17
view Francesca's profile

Now I see it updated with built in cabinets in the two hallways this creates and some great under the bed storage. In my imaginary house, this would great with the office on one side and a dressing room on the other.

posted by renngrrl on 2008-04-08 19:18:31
view renngrrl's profile

That just looks odd to me!

posted by suzy8track on 2008-04-08 21:20:50
view suzy8track's profile

Interesting. I don't know how I would feel about having it in my own home, but it certainly works well in the space there.

posted by lemonader on 2008-04-08 23:16:30
view lemonader's profile

What the hell does slavery have to do with anything ragarding this post? LET IT GO, PEOPLE!

posted by Volvoguy on 2008-04-08 23:43:03
view Volvoguy's profile

I agree that there was no allusion in the text of the post to the Jefferson/Hemmings controversy, but while reading the post and looking at the photo, I was reminded that one of the rumors (which in this case appears to be unfounded) was that she slept in the space above his bed or used it for access to his room. That part of the story must be well publicized enough for a casual observer such as myself to associate it with the photo, and did make the photo, to me, somewhat jarring. Google "Jefferson," "Hemmings," "bed" for a report from Monticello.org.

posted by Doug on 2008-04-08 23:44:57
view Doug's profile

nice small space solution, IF THIS WAS A SMALL SPACE! It looks totally wierd, and clearly there's no lack of space in Jefferson's mansion.

posted by madss on 2008-04-09 03:07:17
view madss's profile

Good thing Jefferson had that career as a Founding Father.

posted by Henrietta the Terrible on 2008-04-09 07:55:44
view Henrietta the Terrible's profile

In Glasgow tenements in the early part of the last century beds were like wall cupboards. Rather claustrophobic I think.

posted by hrhprincessfiona on 2008-04-09 08:41:07
view hrhprincessfiona's profile

Actually, those 3 windows up above the bed are windows into the closet/storage area. That door to the left of the bed is a stairway that leads up to that closet and he wanted to make sure it had good ventilation.

I lived in Charlottesville for 10 years and toured Monticello many, many times. It's actually not as big as you would think ...

posted by Monica on 2008-04-09 10:08:34
view Monica's profile

I realize the post didn't make any reference to slavery and for those who want me to "let it go", my point is that yes, like you, I obviously read this site and enjoy a bit of eye candy, but for me it's just not possible to enjoy the aesthetic of a place which was created in a particularly brutal historical context without mentioning it. I know AT and of course all of its enlightened readers are so "green" and into "sustainability" and "ethically sourced" this, that and the other thing, but when it comes down to it, it's pretty uncomfortable to think about how and where the things we consider beautiful were and are produced, isn't it. So, no, I won't "let it go", mate. Does my comment not make sense to you? Does it make you uncomfortable? I'd have to say, I'm not surprised...

posted by sherry2 on 2008-04-09 11:40:22
view sherry2's profile

Wow... did you just say "LET IT GO"? I guess ignorance really is bliss.

And I have to agree, that's not a "small space solution" when it's connecting what looks to be two large rooms.

posted by myherozero on 2008-04-09 12:10:34
view myherozero's profile

Wow. I wonder how many slaves you can fit into a place like that?
Monticello=Slavery. It was bound to be said.
I agree w/ Sherry2 and myherozero... When you see certain things/places, there are just certain things that automatically come to mind.
Also, it's not a "small space" solution. Looks odd in such a big room.

posted by Sleek on 2008-04-09 12:24:59
view Sleek's profile

Okay, having successfully settled the "fact" that Monticello=Slavery, we can move on to banning Volkswagens because Volkswagen=Nazi. It would also be about as relevant to the original post.

And of course all of the slavery posters also completely shun Ikea furniture, because Ikea=Nazi too, right? That, at least, has something to do with Apartment Therapy.

posted by Ulrika on 2008-04-09 12:51:08
view Ulrika's profile

Hey, word association can go anywhere.

But since you mentioned it, the Volkswagon beetle is a better small space solution than the above alcove bed.

posted by myherozero on 2008-04-09 15:22:58
view myherozero's profile

You can't "enjoy the aesthetics of a place" that once had slaves? Wow then you probably just gouge your eyes out b/c hello, this is America honey, there was slavery all up and down the East coast in every big city at some point, so essentially most historical buidlings, homes, schools were witness to it. Furthermore, the post was about the ARCHITECTURE of the place, which was at the time very new and forward thinking. It's unfortunate that you are so narrow minded in your appreciation of history & of design.

posted by workingrl180 on 2008-04-10 10:13:30
view workingrl180's profile

"Hey, word association can go anywhere."

What, you don't think I'm just picking those examples randomly, do you? Tut. The Volkswagen Beetle was designed and manufactured under Hitler, as a nationalist symbol of the Nazi "volk" (people). Ingvar Kamprad, founder of Ikea, is a former member of a Swedish pro-Nazi organization, and has admitted to Nazi sympathies. If we are going to dismiss designs by association, surely the products of companies that have given profits, aid, and comfort to Nazis in current, living memory are at least as likely candidates as designed by a slave-holder 182 years dead?

"But since you mentioned it, the Volkswagon beetle is a better small space solution than the above alcove bed."

Sounds like a failure of imagination on your part. Just because the exemplar doesn't fit your idea of a small space doesn't mean that the alcove bed isn't a good small space solution. For instance, converting a supernumery closet into a kids' bunk is a great space solution in a small bedroom, and is also an example of the alcove bed.

posted by Ulrika on 2008-04-10 15:48:09
view Ulrika's profile
Buy Text Ads