apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Replacements for these Halogen Light Fixtures?
Good Questions

hqsm111009.jpgQ: My apartment has these incredibly tacky, halogen light fixtures (larger photo below). The challenge is this, the electrical wiring runs through a central support column and the ceiling itself is only 8ft high. So, given that any lighting cannot be pendant style and would have to be attached to that column in some fashion, what sort of suggestions can your readers give me? Ideally it would be affordable, give plenty of light (our winters are long and dark) and also not be halogen.

 
 

hq111009.jpg

Sent by Casey

Editor: Please share your lighting suggestions and sources with Casey in the comments below...thanks!

• Got a question? Email yours with pic attachments here (those with pics get answered first)

Tags

Good Questions

Related Links

Share

Comments (16)

Why *not* halogen?

posted by patrick (the other one) on November 10th 2009 at 9:24pm
view patrick (the other one)'s profile

I think a visit to a lighting store is in order...

posted by bepsf on November 10th 2009 at 10:12pm
view bepsf's profile

You could go with positionable track lighting, with non-halogen bulbs. I know they make some neat track lights with long flexible necks, but I don't know the name. Alternatively, you could get some small pendant lights, run the wiring through the ceiling beam, and rather than hang straight down, attach the cords to the ceiling in a radial pattern out from the beam with the pendants close to the ceiling. Hope this helps.

posted by safarikate on November 10th 2009 at 10:18pm
view safarikate's profile

I think you should stick to halogen, but find some nicer light fixtures. IKEA has some similiar ones that look alot better than the ones you have.

posted by Evergirl on November 11th 2009 at 2:57am
view Evergirl's profile

Not halogen due to the additional energy costs. This is the primary lighting in the living area and as our winter nights are long the costs end up being substantial.

posted by Redsmurf on November 11th 2009 at 6:51am
view Redsmurf's profile

I share your dislike for the halogens.

Your situation may be the one time I would support repositionable spot lights.

Personally, I've added flat ceiling fixtures to walls to resolve problems like yours in the past.

The other part of the solution will likely be floor/table lamps.

posted by PureDaisy on November 11th 2009 at 8:28am
view PureDaisy's profile

I can't tell if it is an MR16 or GU10, but both are available in LED instead of halogen at The Home Depot. So if you do find another fixture you like but has the bulbs you don't like.. there are other alternatives out there.

You could get a flex track lighting system and then add pendants to the track.

posted by tashar on November 11th 2009 at 8:58am
view tashar's profile

yeah, but you also get some additional heat from halogen bulbs if you have long and cold winters.

posted by dn on November 11th 2009 at 11:49am
view dn's profile

"Not halogen due to the additional energy costs."

Um, Halogen is actually more energy efficient than incandescent.

posted by bepsf on November 11th 2009 at 11:57am
view bepsf's profile

"This is the primary lighting in the living area..."

Overhead lighting should never be the primary lighting source in any living room - You need table lamps.

posted by bepsf on November 11th 2009 at 11:59am
view bepsf's profile

"Um, Halogen is actually more energy efficient than incandescent."

Um, ok, but halogen and incandescent are less efficient than fluorescent and LED. The pros and cons of those have been debated on AT at length so I won't go there, though, but it's not like halogen and incandescents are the only types of lighting out there.

i definitely agree though that table lamps would be a great addition to the living room and more efficient for tasks like reading.

"yeah, but you also get some additional heat from halogen bulbs if you have long and cold winters."

true, but you end up being so far away from the light/heat source, and heat rises... so instead of having efficient lighting and efficient heating, you get inefficient lighting and inefficient heating.

posted by elementarian on November 11th 2009 at 3:29pm
view elementarian's profile

Bepsf beat me to the punch-- overhead lighting should never be your default lighting. Makes a room look flat and hideous.

posted by shirley-temple-of-doom on November 11th 2009 at 11:05pm
view shirley-temple-of-doom's profile

These lighting fixtures are the primary ones but not the only ones. More suggestions regarding the initial question would be appreciated.

posted by Redsmurf on November 12th 2009 at 5:26am
view Redsmurf's profile

elementarian--

Not all the heat from a halogen light bulb travels skyward.

Redsmurf--

Well, since the initial question was incomplete and unclear as to your reasons and needs, some additional information (and hence, discussion) seemed to be in order.

posted by patrick (the other one) on November 12th 2009 at 10:22pm
view patrick (the other one)'s profile

patrick: yeah obviously not all the heat from a halogen light bulb travels skyward! but my point is, is it really sensible to defend the use of halogen lightbulbs at close to ceiling height as a source for heat on cold winter nights?!! seems kind of ridiculous to me.

posted by elementarian on November 13th 2009 at 12:38am
view elementarian's profile

If you're trying to both heat and light a room, it seems that a lightbulb that throws some heat makes some sense. Just sayin.'

posted by patrick (the other one) on November 13th 2009 at 1:09am
view patrick (the other one)'s profile

Feeds

RSS icon Chicago

+ City Feeds