I totally get this! I could see someone decorating it with a cool modern spin on an old European/German traditional tree, but $325 seems like an unreasonable price.
posted by
lucitebox
on December 6th 2007 at 5:27am view
lucitebox's
profile
25 dollars worth of bottle brushes, 5 bucks worth of wood and a drill. That's what you need to make this....thing. Come on- this isn't even worth a hot or not poll. ICK.
posted by
lorijo
on December 6th 2007 at 5:28am view
lorijo's
profile
Oh, I clicked Hot before I noticed the price. Sorry.
posted by
Joan A.
on December 6th 2007 at 5:29am view
Joan A.'s
profile
See, why can't I come up with something, charge a crazy price for it and justify it by calling it modern and hip? Whatever.
posted by
chairgal
on December 6th 2007 at 5:30am view
chairgal's
profile
It's hot but it's too expensive.
posted by
Matilda
on December 6th 2007 at 5:33am view
Matilda's
profile
Uh, not. I agree with above comment this looks like it can be made spending little to no money.
posted by
E.I.F.
on December 6th 2007 at 5:34am view
E.I.F.'s
profile
It's a 5 foot tree, so that explains a little, but it still seems very expensive. From the perspective of how it looks, I think it's very cute.
posted by
Deborah
on December 6th 2007 at 5:37am view
Deborah's
profile
Hot, but only if cheap.
posted by
Pixie
on December 6th 2007 at 6:04am view
Pixie's
profile
This would be Charlie Brown's tree if he was a geek.
posted by
cmcinnyc
on December 6th 2007 at 6:11am view
cmcinnyc's
profile
not hot, regardless of price or diy potential. I'm a big advocate of living trees that can be transplanted at the end of the holiday season. I think dead wood is a good term for people who like to decorate dead wood.
posted by
JonathanB
on December 6th 2007 at 6:34am view
JonathanB's
profile
posted by
Trumystique
on December 6th 2007 at 6:56am view
Trumystique's
profile
We have something like this from the 60s that was used in my wife's family's jeans store for the past 50 years until they recently closed. It's basically a stick with bottle brushes and a base. While I enjoyed it, it stayed in the closet this year for a fake (recent) tree that we threw some Thomas O'Brien ornaments at until they stuck. It might come out again next year.
But either way... $325 for something that recreates 60s artificial christmas trees? not.
posted by
eargang
on December 6th 2007 at 7:03am view
eargang's
profile
Eargang, the 60's artificial Christmas trees looked better than this. The designer of this item obviously was just "phoning it in."
posted by
kuroneko
on December 6th 2007 at 7:39am view
kuroneko's
profile
Hot if you made it yourself, but for $325, no way.
posted by
thursday
on December 6th 2007 at 7:52am view
thursday's
profile
that is SO UGLY and if anyone pays $325 for it they are nuts!
posted by
christie
on December 6th 2007 at 7:57am view
christie's
profile
sometimes you can take something ugly to an extreme and it becomes cool, maybe even beautiful. sometimes though? it's still ugly.
posted by
ScottB
on December 6th 2007 at 8:37am view
ScottB's
profile
Oh this is terrible. However, my cat would **love** to rub up against those bristles.
posted by
Qdrophnia
on December 6th 2007 at 2:24pm view
Qdrophnia's
profile
This is not a good picture of Kuno Prey's Bauhaus tree. While playful, it's actually quite beautiful and delicate looking. Click to see a picture of it when MOMA used to carry it. http://www.flickr.com/photos/21626496@N04/2092711276/
posted by
timmy jr.
on December 6th 2007 at 5:27pm view
timmy jr.'s
profile
I think the Urban Outfitters Charlie Brown Christmas Tree that Trumystique linked to is a lot hotter (and sanely priced) than that bottle-brush bore.
posted by
Mike Doyle
on December 6th 2007 at 5:32pm view
Mike Doyle's
profile
Reset Password
Enter the email address you used to register and we will email you a new password.
Thank you, your account has been registered.
We have sent an email to the address you registered with for verification purposes. Please use the link in the verification email to activate your account.
Your Password Has Been Reset.
We have sent an email to the address requested with your login information.
I don't understand... why is this $325?
view quercus's profile
Ummm, green bottle brushes affixed to a tube for 300 bucks. I think not.
view Trumystique's profile
Christmas tree/ toilet paper holder!
view Julia at Living Luxely's profile
I totally get this! I could see someone decorating it with a cool modern spin on an old European/German traditional tree, but $325 seems like an unreasonable price.
view lucitebox's profile
25 dollars worth of bottle brushes, 5 bucks worth of wood and a drill. That's what you need to make this....thing. Come on- this isn't even worth a hot or not poll. ICK.
view lorijo's profile
Oh, I clicked Hot before I noticed the price. Sorry.
view Joan A.'s profile
See, why can't I come up with something, charge a crazy price for it and justify it by calling it modern and hip? Whatever.
view chairgal's profile
It's hot but it's too expensive.
view Matilda's profile
Uh, not. I agree with above comment this looks like it can be made spending little to no money.
view E.I.F.'s profile
It's a 5 foot tree, so that explains a little, but it still seems very expensive. From the perspective of how it looks, I think it's very cute.
view Deborah's profile
Hot, but only if cheap.
view Pixie's profile
This would be Charlie Brown's tree if he was a geek.
view cmcinnyc's profile
not hot, regardless of price or diy potential. I'm a big advocate of living trees that can be transplanted at the end of the holiday season. I think dead wood is a good term for people who like to decorate dead wood.
view JonathanB's profile
Cmcinnnyc, here is Charlies Brown's real Christmas tree, overpriced for what it is at UO here :
http://www.urbanoutfitters.com/urban/catalog/productdetail.jsp?id=13659453 .
view Trumystique's profile
We have something like this from the 60s that was used in my wife's family's jeans store for the past 50 years until they recently closed. It's basically a stick with bottle brushes and a base. While I enjoyed it, it stayed in the closet this year for a fake (recent) tree that we threw some Thomas O'Brien ornaments at until they stuck. It might come out again next year.
But either way... $325 for something that recreates 60s artificial christmas trees? not.
view eargang's profile
Eargang, the 60's artificial Christmas trees looked better than this. The designer of this item obviously was just "phoning it in."
view kuroneko's profile
Hot if you made it yourself, but for $325, no way.
view thursday's profile
that is SO UGLY and if anyone pays $325 for it they are nuts!
view christie's profile
sometimes you can take something ugly to an extreme and it becomes cool, maybe even beautiful. sometimes though? it's still ugly.
view ScottB's profile
Oh this is terrible. However, my cat would **love** to rub up against those bristles.
view Qdrophnia's profile
This is not a good picture of Kuno Prey's Bauhaus tree. While playful, it's actually quite beautiful and delicate looking. Click to see a picture of it when MOMA used to carry it.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21626496@N04/2092711276/
view timmy jr.'s profile
I think the Urban Outfitters Charlie Brown Christmas Tree that Trumystique linked to is a lot hotter (and sanely priced) than that bottle-brush bore.
view Mike Doyle's profile