apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Brad Pitt's New Furniture

060508pitttable.jpgThis morning we covered a lot of important online news territory - and a little fluff, too. As we process news about the economy, the future of politics, and overwhelming natural devastations, we also learn that Brad Pitt's recent attendance at Switzerland's Art Basel culminated in the purchase of a $293k table. He also bought...
060508pitttrio.jpg

 
 

060508pittlamp.jpg...a pair of bronze chairs by Max Lamb ($25k each) and the foam and fiberglass "Family Lamp" by Atelier van Lieshout (we don't have a price on that one). Table shown above is by Dutch designer Jeroen Verhoeven.

Thoughts on Brad's taste?

All info via The Huffington Post.

Tags

Look!, artwork, lighting, seating - dining & sidechairs, tables - dining & occasional, Hot or Not?, inspiration, Art Basel, Brad Pitt

Related Links

Share

Comments (43)

I am a very open person, but these are NOT HOT at all.

I love Brad Pitt so I want badly to appreciate these, but I just cant. I do appreciate his and his wifes humanitarian efforts though :)

-Eleazar
htp://www.blogazar.com

posted by blogazar on June 5th 2008 at 9:14am
view blogazar's profile

Yuck! Those are hideous!

posted by jooly on June 5th 2008 at 9:15am
view jooly's profile

Stick to making movies, Brad...

posted by bepsf on June 5th 2008 at 9:16am
view bepsf's profile

that some ugly furniture! I'm very surprised.

posted by Astrid Vladi on June 5th 2008 at 9:18am
view Astrid Vladi's profile

I'm amazed at how awful they are...

posted by semidivine on June 5th 2008 at 9:18am
view semidivine's profile

That is a VERY electic taste in furniture. I don' t think that if I was a millionaire would I feel the need to purchase a $293k table... especially if it looked like that!

Michelle
http://parttimetherapy.blogspot.com/

posted by mva1201 on June 5th 2008 at 9:20am
view mva1201's profile

Tacky

posted by DD104 on June 5th 2008 at 9:20am
view DD104's profile

i don't know what's more tacky: that furniture or the purchase of it. it drives me nuts when 'champions of poverty' live in such blatant excess. it's like a diet guru opening an all-you-can-eat buffet. it's not consistent.

posted by sarahrice on June 5th 2008 at 9:20am
view sarahrice's profile

Wow...once again...you can have all the money in the world but it does not buy style or good taste.

posted by danze on June 5th 2008 at 9:24am
view danze's profile

Aw. Poor Angelina - as pregnant as she is, she doesn't need this to stress about.

posted by honeyfresh on June 5th 2008 at 9:27am
view honeyfresh's profile

I disagree with the above comments. I actually love the unique shape of the table...I'm not in love with the lamp or chairs, but c'mon...the table is great!

posted by ZAshtianipour on June 5th 2008 at 9:27am
view ZAshtianipour's profile

sarahrice: well said. I completely agree...

posted by spossberg on June 5th 2008 at 9:35am
view spossberg's profile

Right on, sarahrice.

posted by RobertTheChicken on June 5th 2008 at 9:38am
view RobertTheChicken's profile

Well let's hope the twins plus the rest of the brood don't get into all those nooks and crevices of the table, playing hide-n-seek and knock over and break that d*mn expen$ive table!

posted by AT4H on June 5th 2008 at 9:39am
view AT4H's profile

Yuck. Too cold and hard looking.

posted by Kelly/The Vintage Butterfly Boutique on June 5th 2008 at 9:42am
view Kelly/The Vintage Butterfly Boutique's profile

Huh, I'm in the minority - I like the table a lot. It's functional art - it's like a marble mold of very classic table shapes. Is it worth $300k... well that's another story.

posted by renee c.f. on June 5th 2008 at 9:42am
view renee c.f.'s profile

Do people who buy this stuff really LIKE it??? Or do they just like how expensive it is?

posted by nazrd on June 5th 2008 at 9:50am
view nazrd's profile

It's hideous, and the thought of spending that kind of money on a table makes me want to barf.

posted by BambiJo on June 5th 2008 at 9:50am
view BambiJo's profile

That lamp is so terrible.

posted by Laura on June 5th 2008 at 10:01am
view Laura's profile

I love the lamp and chairs. Reminds me of Diego Giacometti.
Also the Table is interesting - negative/positive space trick going on.

posted by sammy123 on June 5th 2008 at 10:13am
view sammy123's profile

somehow the thought of brad pitt out shopping for lamps, art or not, is really unsexy to me.

posted by akostalas on June 5th 2008 at 10:20am
view akostalas's profile

disgusting.

posted by MelissaLeigh on June 5th 2008 at 10:24am
view MelissaLeigh's profile

Perhaps everyone should read the post on Limited-Edition furniture and Design-Art...

posted by Aaron on June 5th 2008 at 10:53am
view Aaron's profile

Does he live in a creepy, 80's bachelor pad? Looks like it.

posted by littlebrownbird on June 5th 2008 at 11:06am
view littlebrownbird's profile

Stick to making movies, Brad... posted by bepsf

Um...as opposed to professional furniture buying? I don't get it. Anyway...

I saw the table at the MoMA's permanent collection. The craft and the ability to create such a piece is quite amazing.

Would it make you happier if he shopped at Ikea? Ethan Allen? The world will never be happy.

posted by cafeen75 on June 5th 2008 at 11:31am
view cafeen75's profile

In response to posted by sarahrice:

Would you rather he support a big box retailer? This isn't about blatant excess but is about appreciating and supporting the artist/craftsman behind the craft.

He gives so much of his money, but more importantly, his time. He is allowed to enjoy a lifestyle he can afford. Shame on you all for judging someone you know so little about and sharing in the hypocrisy you all are guilty of. When was the last time any of you donated your time and money? Hats off if you have.

posted by cafeen75 on June 5th 2008 at 11:41am
view cafeen75's profile

Not a huge fan of the lamp but I can sort of understand the allure of the table - not necessarily the price but the concept.
Keep in mind this was at Art Basel and not some random furniture store. In the end, these are pieces of art. A whole different set of rules applies when you factor in the conceptual and artistic aspects of these items - particularly in the heightened environment of Art Basel.

posted by hessilou on June 5th 2008 at 11:52am
view hessilou's profile

Pitt's been a huge supporter of architectural restoration and contemporary design. Just because you don't like his taste is no reason to slag the guy.

posted by Palmetto on June 5th 2008 at 12:26pm
view Palmetto's profile

But....judging people is so much fun.

:-(

posted by spossberg on June 5th 2008 at 12:44pm
view spossberg's profile

Aww, look - the Pottery Barn clique saw some contemporary design and got itself all befuddled. Isn't that just the cutest thing ever?

I suppose he should have picked up a Saarinen marble table and maybe an Eames lounge chair from DWR?

I happen to have seen this table in person, as would anyone who knows anything about contemporary design, and it's absolutely fabulous, thank you very much. The picture of the chairs is too small for me to tell, but they look interesting - not unlike some of the stuff Moss or The Future Perfect might carry.

I'll give you that the lamp is generally retarded, but that's the smallest and cheapest piece of the three. So get some perspective, people.

posted by andrew from brooklyn on June 5th 2008 at 12:55pm
view andrew from brooklyn's profile

Would any of you say these things to another person's face?

The commenting here is so rude. If you hate the pieces, that's one thing, but the personal attacks that accompany the comments are just wrong.

Honestly, I don't care about celebrities, but I think that the tone and approach people take when they comment from the anonymity they enjoy behind their computer screens says a lot about who they are in their hearts and souls rather than who they present themselves to be in a controlled, social situation.

The pieces shown here are obviously works of art and not intended as run-of-the-mill furniture. Pitt is designing an eco-friendly hotel somewhere (Dubai?) and I'm guessing these pieces may end up there. The setting they end up in will probably have an impact on how they are viewed and I'd bet they will look fine as art displayed in a semi-public place. He's supporting artists and that's a good thing whether you like the art or not.

posted by Orchid64 on June 5th 2008 at 1:32pm
view Orchid64's profile

FOAM AND FIBERGLASS?

ummhhh

posted by bluetoes on June 5th 2008 at 2:15pm
view bluetoes's profile

Compare and contrast:

"It weights about 110 tons, Bruno calculated. It is tempting to think with rising steel prices the ‘unbuilt’ value – the actual material – could exceed the value of the project as a piece of art. 110 tons of steel however equals even with today’s price only about 30.000 dollars. A car is more expensive than that."

http://www.eikongraphia.com/?p=2016

posted by TRUE BLUE on June 5th 2008 at 2:54pm
view TRUE BLUE's profile

Thanks for the link TRUE BLUE - that's amazing!

posted by andrew from brooklyn on June 5th 2008 at 4:46pm
view andrew from brooklyn's profile

I actually quite like the table... the lamp I find a little creepy, but if the table was affordable I'd totally have it my home.

posted by Seshat on June 5th 2008 at 4:52pm
view Seshat's profile

That table is spectacular.

posted by petro on June 5th 2008 at 6:18pm
view petro's profile

I wish I had more pictures of that table so I could see it better, because one of the things I liked about it (based on what I could see) was how those overtly sculpted, artificial furniture silhouettes, when melding into each other, create these soft, organic curves, as if water or wind had worn through the stone.

Even excluding the price, I don't think I would want to use this as a piece of furniture. If I had all kinds of space to display sculputre, though, this would be on my list.

The other pieces--that lamp and the chairs--don't really appeal to me.

posted by Jenny B on June 5th 2008 at 6:37pm
view Jenny B's profile

I think they have quite discriminating taste - I have been lusting after that "table" for quite some time. They are also avid collectors of Banksy, whom I adore.

Please don't consider these to be pieces of furniture, but as pieces of art instead. This is the reason they were sold at Art Basel and not Room and Board. Art isn't meant to be pleasing to everyone.

posted by Barrett on June 5th 2008 at 7:15pm
view Barrett's profile

I adore the table too! While the chair and lamp aren't my style, I appreciate them as works of art. I think the thing that a lot of people here are misunderstanding is that I don't think these are meant to be fully functional pieces of furniture, but rather as pieces of sculptural modern art.

posted by uisceros on June 6th 2008 at 4:29am
view uisceros's profile

I LOVE the family lamp!

posted by Sleek on June 6th 2008 at 4:33am
view Sleek's profile

It looks like papier mache!

posted by Sisero on June 6th 2008 at 6:23am
view Sisero's profile

He should just stick to his acti....oh wait, he can't really do that either.

posted by cweingarten on June 6th 2008 at 7:11am
view cweingarten's profile

Uh, it looks like all the furniture in BeetleJuice.

posted by frontiersperson on June 6th 2008 at 3:55pm
view frontiersperson's profile

Feeds

RSS icon Chicago

+ City Feeds