apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Top Design Season 2 Premiere

090408topdesign.jpgWe want to know: who tuned in last night? We only saw the first 15 minutes or so, in which teams of designers were given a $2000 budget to design apartments for their "clients": Jonathan Adler, Kelly Wearstler, Margaret Russell, and new host India Hicks. We drifted not because of boredom, but because of politics, so we'd love to hear from those who stuck it out. So far, a good start?

 
 

If you missed it, you can watch the entire episode online here.

All opinions welcome! Tell us what you think. Tell us if you've got a favorite so far.

Tags

NEWS, Top Design

Related Links

Share

Comments (34)

I DVRed it and only watched the first few minutes. What's up with the opera dude??

posted by mally313 on September 4th 2008 at 11:10am
view mally313's profile

There's potential for lots of crazy this season.

posted by caw261 on September 4th 2008 at 11:21am
view caw261's profile

I watched it - I think they got rid of the wrong designer...

BTW - I have that compote behind Jonathan: It's a vintage Rosenthal Netter piece that was produced in the 60's by Bitossi of Italy.

posted by bepsf on September 4th 2008 at 11:21am
view bepsf's profile

It was better than the episode or two I watched last year - a real living space, not a three-walled set. India Hicks seems to have the trick of being both gracious and honest.

posted by feathers on September 4th 2008 at 11:23am
view feathers's profile

I liked it. I was impressed by India Hicks as well. Her pictures make her look very stiff, but she comes across real and intelligent on camera.

posted by MayaB on September 4th 2008 at 11:30am
view MayaB's profile

i liked india hicks.

Margaret Russell still scares me... she's like a cross between the a cracked out Stepford Wife and The Church Lady.

Kelly Wearstler needs a stylist.

i don't think they should have premiered the show with a group challenge. the audience didn't get a good idea of each designers aesthetic.

posted by jeffnyc on September 4th 2008 at 11:33am
view jeffnyc's profile

I watched maybe 15 minutes and had to walk out of the room. It was just boring. Todd Oldham is a bore and Jonathan Adler is just plain creepy to me. I'd rather gnaw on a piece of metal than watch it again.

posted by LittleRock on September 4th 2008 at 11:35am
view LittleRock's profile

I watched it with several people. Everyone agreed hands-down that the winning team undoubtedly surpassed the others in their designs.

We really think Wisit (sp?) is going to tear it up, even though he's supa weird. And we ate it up when they told the one girl that her "pop design" looked very "middle school".

BTW - Did anyone see the old window pane against the wall with the cherub statue behind it. AWFUL!

posted by JennJ on September 4th 2008 at 11:36am
view JennJ's profile

After watching a few disastrously boring episodes last season, the ONLY reason I would even think about tuning in again would be Wearstler. rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.......

posted by Thomas on September 4th 2008 at 11:48am
view Thomas's profile

Haha, or the mirror- on the floor...at an angle! Horrid!

I did love the 3 wrought iron panels on the wall of the dining area in one of them. The best part I thought.

posted by Tiffany on September 4th 2008 at 11:49am
view Tiffany's profile

I'm looking forward to seeing what the Martha Stewart guy and the Sex and the City set designer come up with in individual competitions. Other than that, it was rather uninspiring.

posted by Raena on September 4th 2008 at 11:51am
view Raena's profile

My biggest problem was that they had two days and $2k to decorate an entire loft. It was just rediculous. Most of the teams didn't even have time/money to paint the walls. I'm all for shopping at thrift shops (nearly everything in my apt is second hand) but it was excessive and boring.

posted by suziegoombs on September 4th 2008 at 11:58am
view suziegoombs's profile

I was a little surprised about their thrift store finds... I have been to that store, and its always picked out. I guess all the good stuff came from that junk yard... Anyone know where it was?

posted by petesid on September 4th 2008 at 12:08pm
view petesid's profile

I watched last season and was so excited for this season. I thought it started out great. Not sure about the 'quick fire' challenges or whatever they were calling them. Aren't those supposed to be done before the challenge starts? At least that's how they do it on TC.
I thought the challenge was really hard but very interesting. I waited... the... whole episode... for it. And then it didn't happen. Where's the 'See ya later, decorator?!?!?!'

posted by jmcquary on September 4th 2008 at 12:19pm
view jmcquary's profile

yes...please let us know where that junkyard is in la..it looked like a goldmine!

posted by danieeee on September 4th 2008 at 12:20pm
view danieeee's profile

The concept was great, but the execution largely disappointing. What could they do with that budget and that much space?

This challenge should be offered again toward the end of the competition.

Promos indicate Wearstler will be taking her get ups to dizzying heights this season.

posted by Lady J on September 4th 2008 at 12:23pm
view Lady J's profile

is there any place where the episodes can be watched online? sadly top design is not airing in canada :o(

(p.s. i've already aired tried youtube and the bravo website with no luck)

posted by kiwi on September 4th 2008 at 12:36pm
view kiwi's profile

I am happy they got rid of the See ya later, Decorator thing. It was so awful.
And if anyone knows where that junkyard is, please post it here!

posted by hessilou on September 4th 2008 at 12:40pm
view hessilou's profile

Yup, if any one knows what junk yard they went to, BF and I would love to know. I was going to send it in and hope it was posted as a good question.

posted by Jose A on September 4th 2008 at 12:44pm
view Jose A's profile

I like Kelly's style. I think she's a bit eccentric but it works with the whole package. Kind of like her work, would you put those elements together? no. But does it work? I think so.

posted by Garrett on September 4th 2008 at 12:45pm
view Garrett's profile

I watched Season one completely and was glad to see that most of the things that were wrong with it were changed in Season 2.

1. Todd Oldham is a great designer but, not a great host. You can tell it wasn't his thing and now he's in more of a Tim Gunn role as a consultant.

2. The budgets were too big. When you give someone a budget of $50,000 for a room, it's not as challenging as when you give them one of $2,000. The idea wasn't to make a loft space of that size really livable for that amount of money but, to make them think creatively and be inventive.

3. Being stuck shopping at only the Pacific Design Center
is not very creative at all.

4. The judges feedback was more constructive. They actually said why they like/disliked things and gave specific design critiques as opposed to just, it's good or it's bad.

5. No more "See ya later decorator". That was tired.

Overall, I am looking forward to the rest of the season. I think Wisit is going to be the one to beat. He seems a little out there but, so was Andy Warhol.

posted by modernguy on September 4th 2008 at 12:46pm
view modernguy's profile

i think the producers gave them too much to do in such a short amount of time...2 days isn't much time to redo an entire loft.
i did get tired of them whining about how small their budget was...good grief, most of us average citizens don't spend much more than that on our homes...much less all at once. creativity shouldn't be such a burden on them! i am hoping that this year doesn't entail huge budgets to shop for furniture--that does not make for good design.
i'm hoping that there will be fewer team challenges this season.
i'm already not too hopeful, since the producers spent more time interviewing people "we have no time or no money"--ok, we get it! instead of showing us the actual design. don't blink, or you'll miss it.

posted by dalouwa on September 4th 2008 at 1:13pm
view dalouwa's profile

I agree with everyone else who said that the winning design deserved to win - it was far and away the best, and the only one that looked like a place you might actually want to live! The other three looked like depressing college apartments. I've actually been in those lofts, and they're not easy spaces - too tall and narrow. I also agree that Wisit looks like a winner. I think Shazia will be the next to get booted, followed by Jennifer. And that Andrea needs to get over herself, Rick Schroeder or not!

posted by Emily the Cat on September 4th 2008 at 1:16pm
view Emily the Cat's profile

infinitely more interesting than design star. and yes, i need to get a life.

posted by goofybuddha on September 4th 2008 at 2:02pm
view goofybuddha's profile

I was so disappointed by the spaces! They looked so empty and unfinished. the loft designed for kelly was definitely the best of the worst. I like small budgets, because it does force you to be creative and reinvent what you have, but expecting anyone to do that in two days is a little farfetched. And I think they hit the nail on the head by booting the designer they chose (don't want to ruin it for anyone who hasn't watched yet!). not only was that whole mirror thing absolutely ridiculous, and in no way cutting edge, but try wearing a skirt in that entryway! awkward anglesss.......

posted by elizabethy on September 4th 2008 at 2:14pm
view elizabethy's profile

It's just no Project Runway... My attention kept drifting, and the group challenge as a first was boring. I won't watch again unless I'm really bored.

posted by louberrypie on September 4th 2008 at 3:15pm
view louberrypie's profile

The show was better than Sarah Palin's speech

posted by wild-er on September 4th 2008 at 4:18pm
view wild-er's profile

It could be an interesting watch as far as reality tv goes, however I think it gives true interior designers a bad name. There is so much more than picking out furniture and paint colors.

posted by twenty twenty-one on September 4th 2008 at 4:24pm
view twenty twenty-one's profile

Wow, harsh criticism! I liked it with all its quirkiness. The judges are brilliant designers so they can act however they want:)

posted by simplygrove on September 4th 2008 at 8:25pm
view simplygrove's profile

Modernguy hit the nail on the head.

posted by STYLeyes on September 5th 2008 at 6:07am
view STYLeyes's profile

Ugh! This show was renewed? Season 1 was terrible. I loved Todd Oldham way back on MTVs House of Style, but he is like a walking, barely talking zombie on this show. They should have replaced him and Jonathan Adler. This show should be all about the crazy that is Kelly Wearstler.

posted by jamesdamian on September 5th 2008 at 7:38am
view jamesdamian's profile

Thanks STYLeyes :-)

posted by modernguy on September 5th 2008 at 7:50am
view modernguy's profile

Oldham has had other shows since "House of Style."

posted by Lady J on September 5th 2008 at 8:48am
view Lady J's profile

I'm surprised that so many people are liking the new format. While I wasn't crazy about last season, this season seems considerably more stuffy and boring. I thought the "pop design" concept was blah. And with the exception of Wizit, no one really seems to stand out.

posted by bemyescape on September 8th 2008 at 9:50am
view bemyescape's profile

Feeds

RSS icon Chicago

+ City Feeds