It's not hot - but not because it's lazy (I've got no problem with lazy!), but because it's CLUTTER.
Seems totally impractical, too - who has all of their plants in one spot?
posted by
helloat
on 2007-06-15 12:11:54 view
helloat's
profile
Yep, plus it's not attractive at all.
posted by
Kurt
on 2007-06-15 12:31:46 view
Kurt's
profile
You just need more plants to hide it is all. ;->
Seriously though - I would be the perfect customer for one of these.
Getting into a routine of plant watering is something I've never been able to do. Plus I either over water or under water (no pun intended) them.
When I get around to putting in a container garden (either the-12th-of-never because I'm afraid of killing them, or 1-of-these-days because I can't make up my mind), I'll definately have a drip system on a timer outside. Make that two systems. One for the front and one for the back.
posted by
boomer
on 2007-06-15 12:56:01 view
boomer's
profile
If I had enough house plants to make this feel worthwhile, I'd have to be refilling the reservoir as often as I'd otherwise be watering.
posted by
Mella DP
on 2007-06-15 14:48:47 view
Mella DP's
profile
IMO, this is "hot" b/c it's a great way to keep your indoor plants watered when you take a long vacation. Sure, it requires you to put all your plants in one spot, but that's a minor inconvenience for trip prep.
posted by
ami
on 2007-06-15 15:30:55 view
ami's
profile
You have a 65 feet work of hose, so plants would not need to be grouped that closely. It would also allow you to hide the admitted ugly reservoir.
However, it does seem somewhat useful for vacations (which seems to be it's designed purpose as described on the web page).
posted by
phaedrus
on 2007-06-15 16:56:00 view
phaedrus's
profile
i agree with ami. that is exactly what i was thinking about. although, that doesn't help with my extremely fat cat who is on a DIET.
Enter the email address you used to register and we will email you a new password.
Thank you, your account has been registered.
We have sent an email to the address you registered with for verification purposes. Please use the link in the verification email to activate your account.
Your Password Has Been Reset.
We have sent an email to the address requested with your login information.
It's not hot - but not because it's lazy (I've got no problem with lazy!), but because it's CLUTTER.
Seems totally impractical, too - who has all of their plants in one spot?
view helloat's profile
Yep, plus it's not attractive at all.
view Kurt's profile
You just need more plants to hide it is all. ;->
Seriously though - I would be the perfect customer for one of these.
Getting into a routine of plant watering is something I've never been able to do. Plus I either over water or under water (no pun intended) them.
When I get around to putting in a container garden (either the-12th-of-never because I'm afraid of killing them, or 1-of-these-days because I can't make up my mind), I'll definately have a drip system on a timer outside. Make that two systems. One for the front and one for the back.
view boomer's profile
If I had enough house plants to make this feel worthwhile, I'd have to be refilling the reservoir as often as I'd otherwise be watering.
view Mella DP's profile
IMO, this is "hot" b/c it's a great way to keep your indoor plants watered when you take a long vacation. Sure, it requires you to put all your plants in one spot, but that's a minor inconvenience for trip prep.
view ami's profile
You have a 65 feet work of hose, so plants would not need to be grouped that closely. It would also allow you to hide the admitted ugly reservoir.
However, it does seem somewhat useful for vacations (which seems to be it's designed purpose as described on the web page).
view phaedrus's profile
i agree with ami. that is exactly what i was thinking about. although, that doesn't help with my extremely fat cat who is on a DIET.
view elizabeth in AL's profile