
Which of these three classic dining chairs do you think is the best bet for longevity and value? Eames, Cherner or Jacobsen? Jump below for prices and to weigh in...

Which of these three classic dining chairs do you think is the best bet for longevity and value? Eames, Cherner or Jacobsen? Jump below for prices and to weigh in...
Shown above (left to right):
DCW by Charles and Ray Eames (1946) $599.
Cherner Side Chair by Norman Cherner (1957) $629.Series 7 by Arne Jacobsen (1952) $414
More Best of Three:


Eames.
view JonathanB's profile
The Eames seems to be the friendliest to the human hindquarters.
view JennyPeep's profile
I love all three, but I own a set of the Series 7. They're beautiful and comfortable, so I voted for Jacobsen, even though one of my chairs recently cracked.
view visualingual's profile
I am a fan of the 1950's Thonet bent ply chairs...Eames-like, but still affordable!
view jen64's profile
The Eames is my least favorite, but it's so popular right now. I feel like I've seen it way too much.
I vote for the Cherner. They were out of production for a while, but his grandsons recently started reproducing them. The chairs are so delicate, with perfect lines. I especially admire the arm chair version.
My second favorite is the Series 7. It's awesome. I really love Fritz Hansen's Ant. It's a lot like the Series 7, but just a tad bit different.
view DesignHole's profile
I'm bored to numb, dumb tears by all three. I'd rather sit in Pee Wee's Chairy and suck down my spaghetti carbonara than any of these uninspired choices.
view binxie's profile
if the carbonara's any good, it deserves proper flatware
view JonathanB's profile
Unfortunately, the revival of all three will probably do them in. That said, if only one could "win," I'd vote for the Jacobsen.
view dcaries's profile
they are all great but who can afford them??!!
view kellybeegee's profile
the DCW is lovely, but so wide that it is not practical unless you have a huge space. i don't like the Cherner, so i would vote for the Jacobsen, beautiful and practical.
view mrs yow's profile
I do like the Jacobsen, but wish the details were more thought out...not a fan of exposed joint hardware. The DCW gets my vote.
view estydotca's profile
I love the Jacobsen and the Eames... although, as binxie pointed out, they're like songs you used to love until they got so popular that you couldn't stand them anymore.
I've never been crazy about the Cherner because I can't avoid anthropomorphizing the proportions -- reminds me of those freakishly tight Victorian corsets...
http://www.castlekeys.com/Pages/pics/corsetted.jpg
view lightspeed's profile
Cherner, but with arms.
view patrick (the other one)'s profile
of the three, I like the Eames dining chair metal, as opposed to the dining chair wood.
I found the jacobsen and the cherner chairs not sufficiently comfortable for lengthy casual dining. With regard to the jacobsen, I kept sliding forward.
view david's profile
i got a model 7 a few weeks ago for 48 buckaroos.
i own a lcm too, that is my "cool chair, wanna be friends?" collection.
view andrasklang's profile
I like all three for different purposes. I love the Eames DCM (have it as my desk chair at home). The Cherner is a little too formal for my purposes. I voted for the Series 7 because I think it's the best all-around choice. I could easily have some as a dining set (in fun colors) as I could have some around a conference table.
view Modfan's profile
I vote Cherner with arms - I love how delicate they look but they are very comfortable. I hope they hold value as I just bought two.
view Gallivant's profile
DCW all the way...
and believe me... I have some chairs! ;)
see them here:
http://blueantstudio.blogspot.com/2007/04/my-obsession-with-chairs.html#links
and here at the table:
http://blueantstudio.blogspot.com/2007/05/house-tour.html#links
view joel maria pirela's profile