apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Thoughts on Dining Table Displays

093008cb2tabletop.jpgWe were really struck by this table top display shown at CB2 (on the Darjeeling table). The collection of longneck vases make for an interesting look, but we're of the school of thought that a dining table should remain clear and ready for dining (save for one primary centerpiece). What do you think of this cluster look for the dining room?

 
 

Darjeeling dining table ($899) and longneck vases ($3.95-$4.95) available at CB2.

Tags

tables - dining & occasional, CB2

Related Links

Share

Comments (15)

I like the mis-matched chairs but am not crazy about those vases. Maybe a MORE clustered look in the middle of the table would be better?

posted by hessilou on September 30th 2008 at 11:25am
view hessilou's profile

nah...just looks kinda cluttered to me.

posted by chromaspace on September 30th 2008 at 11:29am
view chromaspace's profile

too easy to tip over... love the mismatched white chairs thought

posted by mschatelaine on September 30th 2008 at 11:30am
view mschatelaine's profile

oooooooooh i like. they look like volumetric flasks.

posted by jln3681 on September 30th 2008 at 11:31am
view jln3681's profile

With dishes and everything on the table, the centerpiece would look cluttered - it's too similar to dishes and too spread out for it to work.

I've recently changed my mind about centerpieces though... i've seen ones that reflect the ingredients or history/culture of the meal, and i loved them. Centerpieces as mindful foci.

posted by emilykristin on September 30th 2008 at 11:31am
view emilykristin's profile

The vases are filled with sand - it will take effort to tip them over.

I loved the other views of the use of this vase, the sand technique is lovely!

posted by That70sHeidi on September 30th 2008 at 11:41am
view That70sHeidi's profile

A decent volumetric flask won't tip over with or without sand in it. I've got a few actual volumetric flasks at home - maybe I'll try putting coloured sand in them.

posted by sciencegeek on September 30th 2008 at 11:54am
view sciencegeek's profile

It's hard to tell without seeing everything else on the table. In general, I think a table can work well with more than one 'centerpiece'.

posted by wig3000 on September 30th 2008 at 1:03pm
view wig3000's profile

Cluttered. As my friend Bob would call them: Dustables.

also, i can't help but wonder if this is a 'sponsored' post.

posted by Modfan on September 30th 2008 at 1:29pm
view Modfan's profile

i think it is looking silly. i do like the chairs and the table, but the vases are just huh.

posted by maike on September 30th 2008 at 1:29pm
view maike's profile

I took this vignette as a way to simply show off their wares, not as an actual setting for a dinner party. It's not very functional anyway.

posted by lisan43 on September 30th 2008 at 2:01pm
view lisan43's profile

when i first looked at this photo i thought the vases were fancy toilet plungers . . . .

posted by blueberrygirl on September 30th 2008 at 2:54pm
view blueberrygirl's profile

lol, blueberrygirl

Yeah, I don't think they look very nice.

posted by jamiealyse on September 30th 2008 at 3:32pm
view jamiealyse's profile

The only table, table decor, chairs, and rug are all amazing! it's exactly what I'd want in my house if I could fit a table that big.

posted by mva1201 on October 1st 2008 at 2:39am
view mva1201's profile

i'm with blueberrygirl--'what are all those plungers doing on a dining room table?' was my thought.

posted by loislane on October 1st 2008 at 6:39am
view loislane's profile

Feeds

RSS icon Chicago

+ City Feeds