With the birth of our daughter coming up, it became clear that many things in our small apartment had to go. Among them were the shelves and shelves of books, cds and dvds that were cluttering up our place. The problem was how to organize them so that we could still use them if we needed to find, say our copy of Alice in Wonderland. Fortunately, we already had most of what we needed:
and we could get some really cool software,
Delicious Library.
With this stuff in hand, the rest was simple. You hook the camera up to the computer (we used the computer and camera above, but any G4 Mac and Firewire based camera would do). Delicious Library monitors the incoming video from the camera and when it notices a bar code, looks up the product data on Amazon.com and downloads it into your virtual library including a picture, so you have a nice way to look at all your stuff. When it finds the item on Amazon, it will read the title back to you, so you can really scan a bunch of things quickly. You can also add your own information to each library entry, including a location. We used this to indicate the box label for the books, so that it would be simple to find any book in our collection. (Though sadly, we have to actually get to the boxes first and they are in a storage facility. It would work better if we had dedicated storage space in our building.)
Some caveats:
- Using the camera to scan the UPC codes can take a little getting used to. What worked for us was to actually look at the computer screen preview of the image, as opposed to staring at the camera and whatever is being scanned. This is a little weird, because the image is backwards in the preview, so you wind up kind of thinking like a dentist.
- If your collection contains older stuff, it might not actually be sold on Amazon, or the UPC may not match the UPC that is used currently. Really old stuff might not even have a UPC. In that case you have to use the software to do a title (or ISBN) search. This works OK but isn't as cool as the camera and slows you down. These items also may not have images, so if not having a color preview of the cover for every item is a problem, then you might have to dig around on the Web for an image (which you can then simply drop onto the library entry).
Over the course of this little project (which took a couple days), we found out that we have 612 books and 271 cds. Which is interesting, but more importantly, we recovered about 50 feet of shelf space that we could then either use for other stuff, or leave uncluttered.
Sadly, we couldn't find equivalent software for PC or Linux users, anyone out there with a PC that's done something similar? -jack
Comments (17)
There is a Windows knock-off, called MediaMan. Click on my name for the website.
Thanks for the pointer!
I catalogued all of my books in an Excel spreadsheet. The initial entry of course took some time, but it's very easy to search and sort in Excel, plus now that it's set up maintaining it with new additions is easy. As for location, all my books are on shelves in the den or the living room and are organized by subject and author. As a result it isn't in my spreadsheet but could easily be added.
I've been using Collectorz.com Book Collector and Music Collector. You will need a barcode scanner which you can get off eBay inexpensively. It uses the databases of several sources including Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Powell's, etc. It will even download the book and CD covers.
Darn it Jack! Now I have another technology project to be obsessed with... my husband will NOT be happy. I briefly looked at MediaMan and Collectorz.com; not sure why Collectorz.com costs so much more than MediaMan. Maybe it's more flexible, but MediaMan looks more than sufficient for basic purposes. The website recommends buying a simplified bar code scanner called CueCat from eBay - only about $10.
CueCat? Those little scanners that everyone got with their subscription to Wired in the mid-90s? You were supposed to swipe it across a barcode embedded in an ad and see "rich content" online... Weird that they have an afterlife...
If you have a webcam right there, why can't it take a picture of the front cover? Just for those times when there's no thumbnail on amazon.
sure it wouldn't be a pretty as a scanned cover. But it would be better than nothing and a lot fast than having to go search for a pic out on teh intarweb.
OK, here's a suggestion.
I too have so many books that it's not funny and I don't have the space for them.
After reading about your project, I have some suggestions -- at least for myself:
1. Look for my books in Project Gutenberg and similar Web sites. Whatever isn't copyrighted might be available online.
2. Get rid each book I have if it exists online.
3. Sort through books further. If the books are popular or classics, the library will have them. Thus, get rid of any of these I can bear to part with.
4. Then use your project so that I am boxing as little as possible and keeping only what is essential.
QUESTION:
Wasn't there going to be the equivalent of an iPod for books? If that were to occur, one could toss just about anything, having scanned it.
ANOTHER NOTE:
The bar code is definitely the way to go with this sort of project. It holds the Library of Congress catalog number and automatically assigns books withing a catalog (now a database) using the Dewey Decimal or other systems.
PS:
I LOVE books. I love the way they feel and I love to hold them and touch them and cart them everywhere. That said, my NYC apartment is never going to hold my library. So, if they come out with an iBook or such, I will go that route.
Also, I'd like to add that being able to search a book (say on Project Gutenberg) makes research easy.
Nice tip - storage is infinitely better than destruction or discarding.
/Rant/I find a lot of Design-with-a-capital-D very sad, in that that there is virtually no acknowledgement of a place for books in the idealized lifestyle depicted. A couple of design-y magazines like Wallpaper and Architectural Digest and you're good to go ... the implicit suggestion being that NOT having a library seems to be the most desirable human condition. \Rant\
How's this for an AT design contest: LIBERRIES that aren't just a "storage issue." Coolest-smartest?
This is funny... I did the exact same thing with my CDs, DVDs, and video games a few months ago-- stuffed them at random into labeled boxes from IKEA and used Delicious Library to track what went where. The CDs were already ripped into iTunes, so I have no use for them most of the time, and I'm just today starting the same process with my DVDs (using Handbrake on a new Mac Mini-- the old ibook was far too slow for ripping DVDs).
Books will definitely be next, but I'll be labeling the shelves rather than boxing them up. (There tends to be a lot more data entry with the books, because we have a lot of old and out-of-print stuff that isn't available on Amazon.)
I'm packing for my 9th move in 4 years (from SF to NYC), and oh man, do I hate books. I love books in a lot of ways, but as physical objects, I am not a fan. They smell nice and feel decent individually, but they don't pack so well. Ugh, and hardbacks.
I've gone on a great book purge before packing up the books I really want to keep:
- Reference books I have actually opened in the past year.
- Books I loan to people. (Un?)fortunately, I don't get them all back, and so there aren't so many of those left.
- Books I'll _actually_ read again. Not "oh, yeah, maybe someday", but something I think I have at least a 1/3 chance of reading in the next 2 years.
The rest went to Goodwill, and I'm pretty happy with the outcome. I even had to get rid of the books sitting on the shelf to make me look smart :) It should make the next move (long time from now?) much easier.
I saw the Sony Libre in person, and I am so ready to ditch paper for e-ink. But if it turns out I can't lend my books to friends after the switch, I'll probably stick it out with paper. Lending them is the best part!
I like the Project Gutenberg idea a lot.
I also think that, when the time comes, I will probably go the route of a storage unit, well-labeled and organized boxes, and an excel spreadsheet. Which I may start now... I'm secretly a data-entry and cataloguing nerd...
However, yes, I like books. I like physically having them in my house, for reference and re-reading, yes, but also because I like the way they look. I have to admit I'd put the paperbacks in storage in a heartbeat, but otherwise, yes, I do want well stocked shelves in my actual home.
I agree with A. So much modern design seems so controlled. With your books on the wall you get color, texture,size, shape and soul.
As a professional in the library world I encourage you to cull, weed and shape your library. Creating a library is like creating art. What you choose to keep and present is completely individual and idiosynchratic. It is representative of you. One's library changes over time just as an individual changes. I no longer have Herman Hesse and 30 vols. of leather bound Dickens on my shelves - but I did keep all the vols. that still speak to me. And have added subjects and authors I go to alot or just want living with me.
Like your homes, the library shouldn't be static.
I'd much rather curl up with a book on a comfy sofa that have to read it on a computer. I sit in front of a computer all day long at work - most nights when I get home, I can't bear to turn the home PC on.
I have a friend who is a voracious reader. She reads super fast, too. Not a single book in her house except for what she's currently reading. When she's done, she gives it away (or trades).
We have weeded out LOTS of books in our place. Doanted some to the local library, put others up on Bookcrossing, and gave more to thrift shops. Saved some good ones for eBay. The ones we put outside on the curb always disappear quickly. But I will always want a small library in my home. I'm really glad I stopped buying magazines, though.
I use librarything.com and just enter into web accessible database. It grabs data and pictures for amazon if available. Low onetime cost of $25.00 for life!
I've been using Readerware and love it. It's $40, but you get a 30-day free trial, first.