
Through the years one accumulates many things, and in my case, one of the hardest things to control is the accumulation of books. School, changing interests, hobbies, vacations, projects, and presents, have all represented the addition of a few more books to my library, and although I try to control their influx, it is hard to keep the whole thing organized.
Intrigued by what would be the best way to organize one's books I did a little investigating in the internet and I found some helpful tips.
Intrigued by what would be the best way to organize one's books I did a little investigating in the internet and I found some helpful tips.
1. What stays and what goes? First figure out what you have and what you want to keep. A quick look through all of your books, piling different subsections together, might be helpful to see the different types of books you have. Also, separate the ones you haven't used or looked at in a while. If you haven't looked at them in more than a year and they have no emotional value for you, you should consider giving away or donating these books.
2. Where should they live? Books can get damaged easily. Water and infestation can quickly wipe out your library, so consider their location carefully. Anything away from the floor, pipes, air conditioners, radiators and the like would be a good idea.
3. How do I organize them? Now this step is of course, the longest and most complicated step. Create a system that makes sense to you and stick to it. In my case I decided to organize by theme/subject: design books, architecture books, photo books, reference books, etc.
Different criteria work for different people, and as long as you can figure out your own system and remember it later, anything goes. You can organize by subject, size, language, genre, color (a beautiful but perhaps not so practical approach), origin, etc.
Cataloging programs and websites:
Lately, more and more people tell me about different programs or websites they have used to organize their personal libraries. A quick search on the internet will show you that there are MANY of these programs and you should take a look at several to see which one would be best for you. Here are the ones that were most highly recommended to me:
Library Thing (www.librarything.com): With more than one million members, Library Thing is partly a book cataloging and partly a social networking tool. It allows you to organize and share your personal library and also, if you want, it can connect you to people with similar interests and suggest books you might like. It connects to the Library of Congress, Amazon and hundreds of libraries around the world to get the information you need. You can tag it, sort it, and organize it in many different ways. You can even keep track of the books you have lent out!
Also, if you are into statistics, you will love the information they provide about your books including graphs on the dates of publication, awards, languages, and even something called "Median/mean book obscurity."
Price: Free for the first 200 books. After that, $10 per year for a personal library or a $25 lifetime fee.
Delicious Library 2 (www.delicious-monster.com): A cataloguing application for Mac which allows users to manage not only their personal libraries, but also their collections of books, movies, or CDs. You can manually input your books by typing in the ISBN, you can drag and drop from an Amazon URL, or you can use your webcam to scan the barcode. It will automatically download an image and other important information.
Price: $35
I have also found that cataloging your library in this way will also help you keep track of e-books, consolidating your physical and virtual libraries into one.
(Image: Bookshelf Porn)
Comments (24)
I have a bit of a book fetish myself. Although my collection is hardly in need of a library at this point, one day it will be. And there will definitely be a rolling ladder involved! Thanks for the great post.
I always wanted a library, but with e-readers and so much information available online, I'm thinking by the time I could actually have one, I won't need it anymore.
We currently have two large bookshelves on the only two windowless spots in our sunroom. They don't hold all of our books, and there isn't nearly enough space to really spread things out and organize everything as well as I'd like, but the nice thing is, I really have to maintain a balance, so I'm good about getting rid of books we don't need to keep around.
I organized by color. I'm able to picture the cover of the book I want and know where to look. The system totally confounds my husband, though!
I have many books. Any ideas on paperless living? Is scanning the only option?
I'm with Holiday05. I organize by color and it absolutely works for me (very visual memory). I have to find things for my husband, but he doesn't mind all that much, and it lets me show off my skills. :)
I'm a professional librarian. We have about 3000 books at home, I would guess. I organize them in loose categories: sci-fi and fantasy (about the only fiction we keep), gardening, crafts, reference, mythology, etc. (We typically don't have lots of random kinds of things.) But I think the real key to a home library is regularly reviewing the things you have for ongoing interest. I don't keep stuff for sentimental reasons -- either I AM using it, or I EXPECT to use it. If not, it can be donated somewhere. (Library sales, thrift shops, fundraisers, etc.) This winter I want to review my gardening books. Now that I have my basic landscaping mostly done, there are a fair number I won't refer to any more. In the trade, this is called "weeding", and it's an underrated and essential tool for keeping library collections, public or personal, current and relevant.
I've stopped buying hardcopies more or less unless I see something at a used book store or it is an older edition not available digitally or a very special coffee table/cookbook. I read novels, business and motivation on kindle, use my iPad for cookbooks, design (also using zinio on iPad for several mags now). I do still have ~100 hardbooks left on a sapien bookshelf (organized by size) and filling ~2 of my cubitech shelving. My rule? No other books can enter the home unless borrowed which doesn't fit in these designated areas. Committed to making small space living work...
The link to the Mac program isn't working. Just FYI
I organize by fiction (which includes graphic novels, old lit. text books and short stories collections), arts, reference (dictionaries, old college books, Pantone swatch book, paper swatch catalogs, web coding, etc.,), nonfiction (absolutely ANYTHING that isn't fiction), children and last, but not least, Spanish/Portuguese--all alphabetically by author last name, not necessarily title.
Then on my kitchen counter/bar area, I keep cookbooks and books on food issues (Michael Pollan, Marion Nestle, etc.) organized by size.
When you have something that you haven't looked at for a year and it has no emotional value for you, I think that you shouldn't "consider" getting rid of it - you should GET RID OF IT ASAP. I don't understand at all people keeping around books that they don't read or use relatively frequently. I'm an academic (as well as a voracious reader) and I frequently go through and cull my collection. If a book isn't alive to you, donate or sell it so it can be useful to someone else! I'm amazed at the amounts of books people hold on to and never look at.
organization by colour. always.
Mine are organize more or less by Library of Congress categories. That's just because I spent way too much time in post-secondary education and became accustomed to finding books that way. I plan to update my Library Thing list, export my list and sort it by LCC number, then use that as a guide to sorting. Yes, if you haven't figured it out by now, I'm a very serious bluestocking.
"When you have something that you haven't looked at for a year and it has no emotional value for you, I think that you shouldn't "consider" getting rid of it - you should GET RID OF IT ASAP." I have a lot of books I plan to read and haven't gotten around to reading. Just because I haven't read a classic in 5 or even 10 years doesn't mean I'm not going to enjoy it later. I go through moods where I am interested in certain topics and not others. I like having them on hand for snow days or if the mood hits me. and in the meantime they look nice on my shelf. Not sure why that's a crime.
I agree with ECO5, eleventy-billion percent.
I dont' know how people can organize by color, to me it's kind of disrespectful for the books, like bying per meter leather bound b/c they look nice...
I had to move overseas recently and that was a great way to choose only the books I find really important. I am an educator and most of my books are non-fiction related to my field, but also books I am interested in, with some fiction added (only the best, the ones I knew would be difficult to get in original language here).
I wish I could have a built in.. for now I have four wide billy's which almost exactly fit the width of the home office's wall. One day I might try and DIY them into the built-in look. At the moment all of the shelves are covered, but I am not planning on getting any new books now, so I hope it can last for a while.
Well said ECO5! Totally agree - I guess that's the whole point of having a library isn't it?
Something nobody is taking into account is the weight of books. You may have to reinforce your house's foundation if you are planning a library similar to the one pictured - honestly.
I just love the feeling of being surrounded by books. I have nonfiction in one room and fiction in another. I don't worry too much about organization. I know my collection pretty well (never counted it). I arrange the fiction by author last name. The nonfiction is currently arranged by size because I was running out of room, and that is the most efficient way to shelve books, I think. But now I cannot find anything! That'll teach me to rearrange them!
Can't imagine organizing by color; I do it by subject. But I hate the visual clutter. Thinking of rigging a window shade over the bookshelves to make the room more serene.
I wouldn't get rid of my books either. I remember as a child, I'd often go through my mom's book collection if I wanted something new or different to read.
Well, for me, if all I could say about a book was that maybe I'd read it in five or ten years, then I'd still probably get rid of it and assume that if I ever got the urge, I could just get it from the library. But maybe I'd think differently if I had more space? I live in a one-bedroom and am constantly getting new books (as well as a lot of library books) so my book-space is at a premium.
Speaking of which: libraries, people! Your tax dollars support them - you should use 'em! If you're lucky enough to live near a good one (as many urban dwellers do), please consider checking books out instead of feeling like you have to buy something and keep it around for a hundred years gathering dust on a shelf. If you really love something and know you'll read it again and again, that seems to me to be the time to buy.
I keep all my books, and all organized by alphabetical order, whatever the subjet, excepted table tops, dictionnaries, atlases and grammars, which are grouped together on the bottom shelf of my bookcases (to add weight to their base, since they run to the ceiling).
For me it's by Subject, that's just how I pull books when I go to read something, organizing by color wouldn't work for me unless it's for a wide collection within a particular subject like Cookbooks. When I started culling books, from my own personal library and having inherited two personal libraries, I opted to work by Subject and choose 10 (or fewer) books from each category to keep. That sure made it easier to pack up, without even blinking, whatever remained in any given category. I knew I had my favorites chosen, reserved, and that the rest was just excess. Now, if someone gifted me their personal library, I'd earmark it directly for the public library or a charity shop... the thought was kind but the task proved overwhelming.
So far, cataloging what's left, I'm really enjoying Delicious Library.
I work in a library and have easy access to many other libraries and interlibrary loan. I have a substantial home library, too, but I am planning to get rid of 75% of my books by the end of the summer. Smaller collections of things please me more, these days, and I am so overwhelmed by my choices when I am deciding what to read next that I feel actual anxiety about it. I am shedding my acquisitive youth for a more spartan middle age, I guess!
My home library categories: food & drink; reference; music; history & politics; foreign language; sewing & crafts; art; fiction/drama (includes kids' books and graphic novels); poetry; home & garden. I keep magazines I can't bear to part with in cardboard magazine containers from Ikea. These containers are mixed in with the actual books.
I like the look of libraries organized by color, but that wouldn't work for me because I usually remember a book's color by its front cover, not by its spine, and those things are often different. I disagree that it's "disrespectful" to books to arrange them this way, as another commenter opined. Taxonomies and organizational techniques interest me a great deal; I think it's fascinating to find out how people arrange their books (and other possessions). I like to see what people name their "shelves" on Goodreads, too.