Throughout their lifetime, Dominique de Menil and her husband John amassed one of the world's finest private collections of 20th-century art, which later became Houston's Menil Collection. But in 1948, they were just a young couple looking to building a home for their growing family. They commissioned architect Philip Johnson, then a relative unknown, to design a modern home for them alongside the staid mansions of Houston's tony River Oaks.
The brick-and-glass house that Johnson designed for them was a little shocking for 1948, and especially for Houston, as was their choice of New York fashion designer Charles James as interior decorator. His lavish sensibility infused a little warmth and color into Johnson's elegantly austere interiors, forming the perfect backdrop for the de Menil's collection of eclectic art.
Today, of course, most of that art has found a home at the Menil Collection, the museum designed by Renzo Piano to house the Menils' extensive collection and make it accessible to the public. (The museum, according to Dominique's wishes, is and always has been free.) In celebration of the 25th anniversary of the opening of the Menil Collection, Lonny Magazine published a tour of the couple's home and of the museum itself. You can find it all in the current issue of Lonny, including more on the history of the Menils and the museum.
Read More: Lonny




Z2 iPod Dock and Wi...
I have never been a fan of awkwardly nude art in the bedroom, but I guess if the point is to be provocative, there you go.
Beautiful colors, definitely reminds me of the homes of my aged 60+ artsy relatives in Houston and Dallas.
Thanks for the link to the article. I fondly remember seeing the Menil collection and the Rothko chapel. Great museums. Anybody who has the opportunity should go see them.
Grandpa Munster with long red hair and a great boob. Ummm, no thanks, I'll sleep in the liquor cabinet.
What a beautiful painting. I find it very serene and peaceful. I'm not always a fan of nudes but I really enjoy this piece of art. Maybe because it's not sexualized, it just feels like someone hanging out at peace with herself.
Well, they weren't just any young couple building a house for a growing family...his family did own Schlumberger oil company, one of the world's largest, after all. This was no Philip Johnson starter home.
I'm amazed that people are disturbed by the nude portrait (which is a lovely modern piece) and not by the tiger rug.
I LOVE the blue in that wall!!! the rest -including the nude picture- not so much.
that tiger pelt is horrible.
I find the portrait lovely, wish I knew what it was...?
tiger pelts :( beauty reduced to a dusty rug
I am not defending the idea of a tiger rug at all, but if you go to the Lonny piece you'll find that is a photo of the room in the 1960s, when sorry to say, people were not so conscious of the implications of turning endangered wild animals into rugs, furniture, coats, etc. So it's a historical document, for better or worse.
There's nothing wrong with nude paintings in general . There's just something "off" about this one that just bother's me and I can't quite.... wait, it's the chin! Yup, that's what it is.
@Abala: Luis Fernadez, Spanish, 1900-1973
http://pintura.aut.org/BU04?Autnum=14.382
After looking at the gallery in the link, I am a fan.
@Trikitixa: thank you!