I think these images are really cool, but shiver at the thought of undoing all my stuff in order to group by color, and then having to put it all back again.

I think I'm officially anti grouping by color now. Though it takes many small things and makes them a larger whole, it inherently devalues the individual item. (Though in these photos that premise doesn't really matter and they do look cool...texture within color and all.)

I've never been able to decide if this represents supreme discipline or supreme laziness (i.e., never wanting to ponder "what" looks good with "what"). In any case, I don't live like this. My sister sort of does ... she once gave me a beautiful handcrafted box (a gift from a friend) because was blue ... and there was no place for "blue" in her apartment!

because IT was blue ... sheesh!

:)

In the case of THESE photos, it doesn't even look cool or like it represents any effort ... it just looks like the photographer tinted everything!

There is something very disconcerting about these photos -- maybe it's the jumble of stuff. At any rate, it makes me anxious to see just this concentrated dose of color.

I think this is one more of those trends that will make me glad I don't care one bit about being trendy. I'll just stick to my own style, which works quite well for me. Including keeping my books organized topically. Works for the library, works for me.

I never liked the grouping books by color. It might be different for me since I use my books professionally (design reference library rather than literary books) but for me it just seemed inefficient. I'd much rather have them grouped by category for ease of use.

clothes by color
books by subject/size

I'm with geoff
definitely group books by subject category and not by color