Shagreen has been a luxurious decorative material for many centuries, though it is perhaps most closely associated with the Art Deco era. Signifying luxury and exoticism, this often controversial material is once more in vogue.
Shagreen typically refers to the skin of rays, sharks or dogfish, all of which are cartilaginous fish with a smoothly pebbled texture. It has been used for centuries as a mild abrasive, like sandpaper, in smoothing wood and metal.
Supposedly, ray skin has been prized since the time of the pharaohs, and during the Chinese Han Dynasty (202 BC - AD 220). It has been better documented and preserved since it began appearing on the sword hilts and armor of Japanese samurai during the Middle Ages, in part because its texture provided a reliable grip.
Europe began importing shagreen-covered objects during the 17th and 18th centuries, and in the mid-1700s, a tanner in Paris became the first European shagreen expert (his name, Galluchat, has been transformed into galuchat, the French word for shagreen.) Louis XV's most famous mistress, Madame de Pompadour, was the dominant patron of Monsieur Galluchat, and it was said that a week didn't go by when she didn't buy some new object, often in shagreen.
Shagreen was often imitated in more accessible materials. Craftsmen would insert seeds into untanned leather, and then pressing the seeds into the leather before discarding them. They would then typically dye the reverse side green to approximate the authentic skin. The word "shagreen" supposedly comes from the Turkish word "sagri," which refers to the rump or haunches of a mammal, presumably used in approximating the distinctive texture of sting rays.
Shagreen became a popular material again in Europe during the Art Deco era, when designers sought to fuse the French tradition of luxury with exotic and precious materials. Designers like Clément Rousseau and Jean-Michael Frank used shagreen to create their most sumptuous furniture (images 4 & 6).
There is some controversy about whether shagreen is an environmentally correct material. While some sources claim the use of the material may threaten the species, designers who use the material insist that their practice does no harm. At least two prominent companies that use shagreen, Ironies and R&Y Augousti, claim that they use only sustainably-sourced remnants from the fishing industry (images 9 & 10).
Most extant antiques with shagreen are smaller objects, like glasses cases and sword hilts (images 2 & 3), but you can really see how durable the material is, through centuries of both use and neglect. Today, you can find all sorts of objects in both real and faux shagreen, including tables, decorative boxes and picture frames.
Images: 1 Detail of a tableto by Jean-Michel Frank, via Paris Originals; 2 Qing sword from the Qianlong period, sold at Sotheby's in 2002 for about $74,000; 3 Etui made in China circa 1900, via Ruby Lane Antiques; 4 and 5 Small 1912 shagreen commode by Iribe and a 1921 chair by Clement Rousseau, both at the Musée des Arts Décoratifs in Paris, via Michael Hampton's blog; 6 Shagreen lipstick case by Cartier, circa 1930, sold by Sotheby's in 2006 for about $750; 7 Jean-Michel Frank cabinet from the early 1930s, sold by Christie's in 2000 for about $746,000; 8 Karl Springer table from the 1970s, available from Craig Van Den Brulle on 1st Dibs; 9 Shagreen nesting tables from Ironies; 10 R&Y Augousti Metal Circle Desk, available from Lille for $5,300.
Sources: There is a beautiful French book on shagreen by Jean Perfettini called Le galuchat, published a few years ago. But I like this online history from The Leather Connection.
R&Y Augousti items are available through Lille and at Barney's. Ironies is available to the trade at Jerry Pair.











White Enamel Flatwa...
I can't believe you guys are promoting shark skin. Yes, of course the designers would say it does no harm. Just like Fashion designers say fur is not cruel, and have no idea of where it comes from...
Frankly i'm disappointed with this post... whats next?panda skin rugs... Sea Turtle Coffee tables...
I'm with yves2013.
Looking at this makes me feel queasy in that cruel, terrible way.
I get it shagreen is a beautiful material - and I have used faux shagreen on multiple projects. But why even suggest to use actual shark skin or sting ray skin. Can you even argue that these animals are sustainably harvested in a human way?
Why not just promote the fantastic faux shagreen options or a DIY method? The idea of sustainably harvesting fish from depleted oceans just really misses the boat.
*** my apologies - I meant humane way***
This also makes me feel sad; but I didn't get from the post that they were promoting it's use.
I read that they have noticed more of it in design. Is an observation really a form of promoting?
anna - very, very brave of you to even touch this subject on AT.
couldn't help but wonder if it was an April Fools post..
I was just waiting for a knee-jerk response like that from yves2013.
Last I checked Yves, stingrays and sharks aren't endangered species. As for the "sustainably sourced" new material - did you not read the link where it states that the material is sourced from animals which are caught for food by rural fishermen in SE Asia? If the skins were not used, it might end up just tossed away & wasted.
And discussing the historical use of a material for antiques - where the animal has been dead for decades - doesn't exactly equal "promoting" it.
Simply because you disagree with something is no reason to ignore it. I think this post is a fascinating history of a material. It's not telling you to go out and buy it (and indeed I doubt that most of us could, even if we could get over the ethical considerations).
I had never heard of this material before, so I found this to be really interesting. Thanks, AT.
To those who are feeling "queasy": Do you also feel queasy when you go into a museum and see a tiger skin? Yes, we need to protect the animals that are left, but that's absolutely no reason to make the history that has already occurred a taboo subject.
I’ve been a long-time follower of AT and if I just registered to leave a comment for the first time, it’s simply because I can’t just say nothing after reading this post.
Ok, you guys have a responsibility not only towards your readers but also towards many of the things that make design possible, like sustainable resources. Forget about fair trade, would you recommend buying furniture coming from illegal logging? Garments made with dubious processes?
Advertising such an obnoxious industry in this space is a slap in the face in times of alarming species extinction, massive water contamination, preoccupying market practices and so on.. would you reconsider your topic- screen process so it doesn’t totally contradict some the “green” spirit that has always prevailed in AT? (re-nest, hello?)
Seriously?
1. more than 100 out of 400 shark species are being commercially exploited
2. many of these shark species are so over exploited that even their long-term survival can no longer be guaranteed
3. a serious monitoring and control program is lacking for international shark trade.
How is this material in anyway "do no harm"?
I'm with Bepsf, this post is about the history of this material and how it was applied. Simply talking about the history of this material is not promoting it. Quite frankly I would like to know more about tortoise shell and its history, but that doesn't mean I'm going to go out and get the real thing.
I would also like to register my extreme displeasure with this post.
And for those who think there is nothing wrong with "harvesting" sharks, please see: http://www.sharkalliance.org/v.asp?level2=33&depth=2&level3=33&level2id=33&rootid=14&nextlevel=33
for all of you so upset about the shark thing...
As far as I can tell, all the objects in this post are actually made with stingray skin, not shark skin. you can tell because the still have the white raised bit in the center of the cuts, indicating the peak of the stingray's back.
shark skin is texturally not as smooth as sting ray, and is in fact fairly abrasive.
not that killing stingrays is cool, but they are not as high on the foodchain or as endangered as sharks.
Comicgeek;
The information posted is indeed about the history of the material. I'm all for a history lesson.
But how is it not promoting it?
"... two prominent companies that use shagreen, Ironies and R&Y Augoust" <--- is this not promotion?
@yves2013: I understand your environmental concerns, but I didn't read the article as a "yay! Buy shagreen!" post, either, despite the fact that they pointed out two companies who currently use it. They used Ironies and R&Y Augoust's products as images, and are probably required by editorial standards to attribute them.
Great, a new disease of the week.
People...
"keep calm and carry on".
Very interesting. I assumed shagreen was some sort of fabric.
I think AT presented the information in a very neutral way.
Shagreen is beautiful. Live sharks and rays are more so. Sharks are also endangered, very important to the food chain, and very slow in replacing their population. It is possible that within most of our lifetimes there may be no more sharks.
If you're going to buy this type of thing I HOPE it is vintage!
Yes, the history of shagreen is interesting, but WHY didn't you mention the controversy in the post? Why do so many of us posters know this but AT evidently doesn't? (Or wimped out?)
P.S. Forgot to add. I have no problem with cowskin. But I feel like this is almost as bad as promoting buying ivory or rhinocerous horn or some other endangered creature. Let's try to ecologically responsible, okay?
My love of my stingray clutch apparently makes me someone akin to Cruella DeVille.
Who knew? I suppose I should have just bought leather. Oops, I meant vinyl...or not, with the offgasing and the chemical waste and all... how about organic straw sustainably harvested by fair-trade farmers with progressive gender politics?
Don't get your shagreen panties in a twist.
@ elvedon
your sarcastic and ignorant remark was noted.
There is nothing sustainable about killing wild animals for their skin, and it is well known that shark populations have been dramatically reduced, and many species of rays and sharks are indeed endangered. The idea that any of it is sustainable just because it was taken from fishery "remnants" is also an error because that type of by-catch fishing is not sustainable and kills many fish (and other marine life) that are not used at all. I think the problem here is talking about shagreen being "en vogue". Because many of us here at AT want to be stylish and participate in trends, a post like this can really sway people's decisions to seek out and purchase products made with this unsustainable material. To be fair, I think the sheepskin trend is also equally bad, but in a different way. Although the sheep are not wild animals, they do use up resources such as land and water. On the plus side, these animal products do tend to last longer than their synthetic equivalents, and can biodegrade eventually. :) Oh, not to be all snarky, but seriously the images shown of the shagreen make me not want to buy it. It just looks old and dusty and nasty. Ok, sorry for the neg post. Have a great day everyone!
I do also wish AT had noted more of the controversy surrounding shagreen. One of the reasons many shark species aren't currently listed as endangered is because of political lobbying by SE Asian countries, not because they aren't in danger of being exterminated as a species.
I found some wonderful faux shagreen embossed paper in beautiful colors at Sam Flax in SF. It looks and feels like the real thing but really cheap for a big sheet. Real shagreen cracks and is so much for a little piece.
This makes me ill. Also, in the way that they are caught and slaughtered is disgusting. What gives humans the right to kill important creatures of the sea to eat or use as decorations. Sorry this makes me angry I knew I should of not looked.
Interesting history of a material, but unbalanced in the sense that similar research regarding the environmental impact of the commercial use of this particular type of animal skin was not included. The omission comes across as promotion. The commercial use of wild animal products for fashion and decor has historically endangered many species, and when combined with sheer human population numbers and global warming species declines and extinctions will escalate. We really need to be thinking about the planet when making our choices... in my opinion.
you AT people are getting all worked up. This was a very popular material used in the 20-30's. It is now making a revivial.
Does it really matter how the skin is acquired? because honestly, the target market for AT is NOT the client that can even afford this stuff. PLUS if it was affordable, you would be able to buy it mass-manufactured at places like Target.
These items are very limited editions and small runs, even one-offs of furniture/accessories.
Buy real buy fake to pretend you can afford the real stuff... who cares?!?! it's just a blog discussing a relativey rare/expensive material.
by the way... what about the whales???
Commercial tuna fishing is a bigger threat to endangered ocean life than this will EVER be.
The only thing that made me wonder was the comment "rural fishermen in SE Asia." Hmmm. I think I've been watching Whale Wars too much.
"I think I've been watching Whale Wars too much."
Try Axe Men for a change Patrick -
The guys are way better looking...
;-)
@Kjansson I'm pretty sure if people can save up enough clams for their vintage Eames and Ligne Roset stuff, they can save up enough clams for a little snippet of sharkskin. Maybe not everyone here is rich, but I think it's safe to say that many readers make it a priority to have a couple of nice things, some of which are very expensive.
@ kjansson
"Does it really matter how the skin is acquired?"
You can't be serious??? who cares if some poor Asian hooked a shark, cut it's fins off, then skinned it and then tossed it back into the ocean half dead... right? who cares, as long as it matches your expensive décor ...
In my opinion It does matters how anything is acquired, wether it be Shagreen or come cheap pair of shoes bought in Target made by some kids in China. Ignorance does not change the fact that we are completely exploiting our planet for our own selfish purposes.
@jacasi
"The commercial use of wild animal products for fashion and decor has historically endangered many species"
Think of the Quagga (African Zebra like Horse). It was brought to extinction because their leather was used to make fan belts in the 1800's.
For those of you who would even consider purchasing Shagreen, shame on you.
Oy this is making me sick. And yes AT is promoting it here, stating it is 'in vogue' again, and noting the popular companies that use it.
It's really disappointing to think that people can still turn a blind eye to the exploitation of threatened species for their personal gain. I understand it's origins in the home, and maybe even get the ignorance of those who used it in the 30s and 40s but people didn't have the knowledge they do now - heck, women smoked and did drugs while they were pregnant! They didn't understand the ramifications of their actions then and we clearly do now...so saying it's just 'making a revival' isn't an excuse for exploiting and abusing a species.
And of course companies are stating that their production 'does no harm.' Does anyone actually believe that? It's the fur production trade all over again. Go google the specifics of that one and see if you change your mind. Any industry that skins animals certainly does immense harm, and shagreen is no different.
Wow, it's one thing to care about the environment but, what the heck would you all have done say a couple of hundred years ago? Starve because you don't believe in killing animals? Nuts and berries are only around for a certain time of year. Freeze to death because you wouldn't use fur? Using all natural materials dead or alive was the only resource. Artificially produced products is what is causing us to pollute the earth in the first place. I'm sure all of you inadvertently have some kind of animal product in your home without even knowing it anyway.
haha @ citygirlincountry.
There is a huge difference between using fur, or eating meat to survive as opposed to using leather from a species being exploited like sharks.
I eat meat and I have a few animal products in my house, (leather shoes, cow hide pillows etc). But I would never even consider using products like Shagreen.
oops, I didn't finish my sentence
There is a huge difference between using fur, or eating meat to survive as opposed to using leather from a species being exploited like sharks for the purpose of decoration.
As someone who thinks nothing in the world is as glamorous as a full-length sable coat, I say: Right on, shagreen!!
I should add that I REALLY want that lipstick case.
*ahem*
"There is some controversy about whether shagreen is an environmentally correct material. "
...for the people who commented about AT not mentioning the controversy (a basic word search might have helped).
I'm a pretty staunch environmentalist, but I'm firmly in the camp that writing about a topic is quite a separate thing from promoting it. I understand the emotion and urgency some people feel, but spurious accusations are not exactly helpful.
Some of you are being ridiculous. Do you honestly think for once second that a shark wouldn't eat you if given the opportunity? It's Darwinism, kids.
**but sometimes I think AT posts controversial articles about animal skins or painting wooden furniture to increase comment traffic**
I live in coastal Southwest Florida. We have a huge and diverse population of sharks and rays here, but have recently imposed harvest reductions/bans on some species as the result of intensive studies (most notably by Mote Marine Laboratories) proving sharp population falls and educating local folks about the surprisingly slow maturity cycle of these two groups.
That being said, why should you not use every part of an animal harvested for food, and use it in the most desirable way possible? Mass produced items from shark and ray skin seem a bad idea, but handcrafted items produced by licensed and permitted artisans are a great way to keep waste to a minimum and respect the utility of a harvested animal. It's a beautiful material that deserves better than being trashed. Wise use of a local renewable resource is smart and respectful
There's a guy here that makes incredible shagreen motorcycle seats, and nobody buys one without becoming more aware of the life cycle and habits of rays.
No, crazylady - extremely low probability of a shark eating you given an opportunity. They might bite you, mistaking you for a prey animal given an unusual set of circumstances. You could die from blood loss, but your flesh is not on their playlist.
@ darcitananda
Exactly my point.. Saving up for "vintage Eames and Ligne Roset stuff" Um, FYI, Lige Roset and Vintage Eames is NOT expensive! If you have to "save up" for shagreen or LR, this means YOU are NOT the target market for this sort of sophistocation...
Seriously people, the world needs us to focus on more important issues right now rather than an AT posting on shagreen!!!
try focusing on something more immediate like this:
If you are not healthy and we are killing ourselves FIRST, then none of us will have the strength to fight for anything even sting-ray skins!!!
http://www.thekitchn.com/thekitchn/take-a-ted-break-dan-barbers-love-story-with-fish-111244
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/mark_bittman_on_what_s_wrong_with_what_we_eat.html
http://www.ted.com/talks/ann_cooper_talks_school_lunches.html
@ staticfritz
Thank you!
@businessgypsy: By all means jump in a tank with some lovely sharks and prove your theory.
re: @businessgypsy: By all means jump in a tank with some lovely sharks and prove your theory.
posted by CrazyLady on April 2nd 2010 at 4:26pm
Well, yes - I do so at least four times a week after my low tide bike ride on Fort Myers Beach. The tank in question is the Gulf of Mexico, and the very lovely sharks are Bulls and Hammerheads - some of the most frequent biters of the extremely infrequent bite incidents. Not a theory at all, rather a practice. Also shuffle my feet to avoid spooking the beautiful stingrays. Pity you can't enjoy the same pleasure, but you're most welcome anytime!