apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


The Painted Portrait: Not Old-fashioned Anymore!
Austin

101708portrait-03.jpg The painted portrait has been a staple of traditional interior design for many years. Once prominently displayed over fireplace mantles or in grand dining rooms, they fell from their important status as rooms slowly became more and more casual in design. We've run into one artist bringing the painted portrait into the modern world...

 
 

101708portrait-02.jpg Although giving off the appearance of digital pixels, all of Kristine Baerlin's portraiture work is painted by hand. The signature circular pattern seen in her work is her unique modern style. Working with clients to come up with the perfect size and best color combinations, she customizes portraits to fit the style of your home. And with the fresh and modern aesthetic of this art, her pieces are bound to look great in any home, even traditional!

101708portrait-01.jpg What do you think about this modern portraiture? Let us know!

[Photo credit: Photos from Figment Studio website and newyorksocialdiary.com.]

Tags

AT Austin, history, portraiture, family portraits, modern art, modern portraits

Related Links

Share

Comments (9)

Not so much - I'd rather have Black and White photographs or traditional painted portraits.

posted by bepsf on October 16th 2008 at 12:13pm
view bepsf's profile

Kind of a mix of Warhol, Alex Katz and Chuck close with a digital remake. Not all that original, and likely to fall out of style quickly, but at least technically they're well made. Its always way better than the usual "your portrait in oils based on a photograph".

posted by Daniel Poitiers on October 16th 2008 at 12:23pm
view Daniel Poitiers's profile

I too feel like this will soon be dated. I'd rather have a traditional, realistic style, but let the styling cues of the subject, the body language and background modernize it.

posted by BlueYonder on October 16th 2008 at 1:37pm
view BlueYonder's profile

Since when are actual works of art dated?

This is sort of cute, but it's dangerously close to "your face immortalized in fruit stickers. "

posted by Palmetto on October 16th 2008 at 1:56pm
view Palmetto's profile

For a truly beautiful and modern portrait artist please check out this website...

http://www.annmarshallart.com

posted by xtina6463 on October 16th 2008 at 2:37pm
view xtina6463's profile

No, the pixellated looks scare me a little. I'm sure the technique is there, I really like Chuck Close's work, for example. These people are too happy, they've just sat for a series of photos, smiling, and everyone who comes to their house is going to have to look at their giant heads. This is not to speak of people who use their living room walls to record their children's growth and the portrait sitting packages at Sears they had a coupon for, but the examples really remind me of those kinds of people.

posted by K T G on October 16th 2008 at 7:05pm
view K T G's profile

Perhaps that is what "those kinds of people" like and enjoy living with? Sometimes things are just cultural. That said, I think it's interesting that someone is using a hand-done technique to create something that looks like a computer did it.

posted by gourdsaregorgeous on October 16th 2008 at 8:05pm
view gourdsaregorgeous's profile

I'd like to know what her process is. At first glance I would guess that she takes a photograph and applies digital filters to pixelate the image, then paints it on canvas by hand. I would rather have the digital image printed rather than painted, since the handpainting just adds the cost of labor. The method she uses removes any of the fluidity and liveliness that free-flowing brush strokes convey. Creating something by hand that a computer can produce in seconds seems like a backwards process.

posted by Charmmi on October 17th 2008 at 4:39am
view Charmmi's profile

I realize that these things are a matter of taste, but these are not at all a style that I would want in my home.

The best portraiture, in my opinion, takes an ordinary moment and transforms it into something monumental through the techniques of art, lighting, posture, color, etc. (see John Singer Sargeant)

This, on the other hand, reproduces the worst of digital photography. It takes what should be beautiful and transforms it into something even more mundane than the original. Not good.

posted by shanti on October 17th 2008 at 8:05am
view shanti's profile

Feeds

RSS icon Los Angeles

+ City Feeds