apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Good Questions: Who Designed This Artwork Print?

091508mystery_poster.jpg"Hi, I'm Maiko from LA. I've been a big fan of AT for about a year! I'm writing you today because there is a poster I've been searching
for a long time. And I'm wondering if you could be of help. Can someone identify this work?"

Definitely one of those cases where you've seen a piece numerous times, but the name/source escapes you. Anyone out there able to solve this artwork mystery for us?

 
 

Tags

Good Questions, print, artwork

Related Links

Share

Comments (18)

It's a Damien Hirst - also known as the man behind shark-in-a-tank, splatter tie dye and diamond-skull fame amongst other things. Of the top of my head, I think that one might be "Valium" (that series is all based on drugs).

posted by anablackburn on September 15th 2008 at 3:14pm
view anablackburn's profile

Damien Hirst Valium , 2000
http://www.eyestorm.com/works/detail/Damien_Hirst/41667.html

posted by Trey Watts on September 15th 2008 at 3:14pm
view Trey Watts's profile

Only $20,000 USD... a bargain... NOT! This look like it can be reproduced by Illustrator pretty easily and then you can have the poster printed online.

I remember that image actually... it was from Martha Stewart Living magazine years ago!

posted by minty on September 15th 2008 at 3:22pm
view minty's profile

Ha, I feel silly now because I saw that Hirst piece in person years ago. I just assumed it was a reproduced knockoff or "inspired" piece.

posted by gregory on September 15th 2008 at 3:28pm
view gregory's profile

can anyone tell me if those dishes are vintage or new? and their proper name?

posted by mannequingirl on September 15th 2008 at 3:41pm
view mannequingirl's profile

Just as an aside - If somebody was to shell out the $20K for this piece, just a word of caution that the market was flooded with fakes of this piece (as well) as the companion print, LSD a few years back (fake signatures, fake edition numbers, etc) and being passed off at not fake prices.

Apparently Minty wasn't the only person who thought it would be okay to replicate the artist's work.

posted by anablackburn on September 15th 2008 at 3:43pm
view anablackburn's profile

Those dishes look like vintage lustreware to me. I remember tearing this page out from Martha stewart mag back in the day..or was it the now defunct Blueprint? I don't remember.

posted by snoopy on September 15th 2008 at 4:16pm
view snoopy's profile

Damien Hirst for a child's room
from Remodelista
http://www.remodelista.com/2008/04/06/childrens-rooms-dwell-studio-wall-art/
"a collaboration between Dwell Studio and the UK’s Graham & Brown wallpaper company.. "

posted by greenlight on September 15th 2008 at 5:52pm
view greenlight's profile

It's the Swid Powell lustreware in this picture that has always haunted me -- I remember this feature in MSL (it's not vintage). The woman pictured designed the lusterware for Swid Powell -- that was part of the article. I keep haunting the usual china replacement sites for pieces, but never find any in the colours I want.

I really, really wish someone would resurrect Swid Powell and would reissue this line.

posted by mschatelaine on September 15th 2008 at 10:24pm
view mschatelaine's profile

what's wrong with copying an artwork for your own personal use?

posted by minty on September 16th 2008 at 4:32am
view minty's profile

Nothing, minty. I think the warnings were directed towards collectors, not someone who just wants a nice looking print in their home.

posted by typicalstudent on September 16th 2008 at 4:50am
view typicalstudent's profile

uh, I'm an artist who does think there's something wrong with copying an artwork for your own personal use. (And aren't collectors people who want a nice looking print, painting, photo, in their home?) I guess the difference is wanting to support the talent, work, student loans, 2nd shifts, studio rents, supplies and sacrifice that make it all possible in the first place instead of taking advantage.

posted by DKinNY on September 16th 2008 at 5:52am
view DKinNY's profile

ugh, except maybe Damian hirst.

posted by DKinNY on September 16th 2008 at 5:56am
view DKinNY's profile

Thank you for all the replies!

posted by maiko1 on September 16th 2008 at 7:51pm
view maiko1's profile

oops!I sent the message before I was done. Finally I felt clear that I found out whose artwork it is, thanks to all. But the price is a little out of reach.....too bad. Thanks for posting this question for me, AT!

posted by maiko1 on September 16th 2008 at 7:56pm
view maiko1's profile

>>what's wrong with copying an artwork for your own >>personal use?

Violation of Copyright Law of 1976, for one small thing.

(No, it doesn't mean anything that you aren't SELLING it, the law restricts the right of making duplicates to the artist, or whomever the artist gives/sells the copyright to -- the artist gets to decide, not some random person who doesn't want to pay the artist for the privilege.)

Choose something else if you can't find an authorized reproduction.

posted by SherryBinNH on December 30th 2008 at 12:38pm
view SherryBinNH's profile

DKinNY--

You can't stand on that principal, and then decide the principal doesn't apply when you personally don't like the artist... what if people felt that way about you or your work?

posted by patrick (the other one) on December 30th 2008 at 10:21pm
view patrick (the other one)'s profile

Feeds

RSS icon Los Angeles

+ City Feeds