apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Kaufmann House Sold for 16.84 Million!
LA Times 5.15.08

051508lat6.jpgGrace mentioned the famous Kaufmann house recently, as the location of the recent J.Crew campaign. The house was slated for auction Monday in New York at Christies (the homeowners got divorced), and was estimated to sell for between 15 million and 25 million. It finally sold for 16.84 million to an undisclosed buyer! It "...commanded the highest price of the American modernist houses recently sold as architectural collectibles."

Check out AT:NY's post when it first went public that it was going to auction, and check out the article in today's LA Times about the final sale, here.

[ image LA Times ]

Comments (14)

"Architectural collectibles"? Oh the fun pastimes of the wealthy!

That looks like a gorgeous place to live. I would have kept the marriage together for the house!

posted by jooly on 2008-05-15 09:34:28
view jooly's profile

why is it "infamous"?

posted by Carder on 2008-05-15 09:50:38
view Carder's profile

oops- typo!

posted by jonathan on 2008-05-15 09:57:12
view jonathan's profile

Oh, ok. you meant famous.

I was hoping to hear a story involving a dead starlet, a venrable actor, drugs, booze, sex and a hardboiled private dick (detective).

Clearly I have a salacious imagimation.

posted by Carder on 2008-05-15 10:26:46
view Carder's profile

I think the only "infamous" scandal here is the price someone paid for this place. It's lovely enough, but it's still nothing more than a little bit of metal, glass and stone sitting in the middle of the desert.

posted by hejiranyc on 2008-05-15 10:58:02
view hejiranyc's profile

Maybe this post should have elaborated a little more on who Richard Neutra was.

He had the pleasure of working with and learning from Frank Lloyd Wright, perhaps one of the most important architects of all time. Neutra himself became very important for the modernism movement, although I think he's a little more international style than modernism.

posted by stephanie.melissa on 2008-05-15 11:18:03
view stephanie.melissa's profile

I work in an architecture library. There are a zillion books on Neutra. You might pick one up.

People should read (preferably BOOKS) before posting uninformed comments about the importance of America's cultural landmarks. The Kaufmann house is an icon of 20th century architecture.

It's worth every single penny. Oy.

posted by Mr. Dangerous on 2008-05-15 11:42:24
view Mr. Dangerous's profile

Mr. Dangerous, regardless of the iconic status of Neutra, regardless of one's ability or choice to read; when balanced with more practical issues in this world, this house truly is "a little bit of metal, glass and stone sitting in the middle of the desert."

We choose to value it (which in fact I do). It has no intrinsic value.

Just because not everyone values such things is no reason to be insulting.

posted by Carder on 2008-05-15 12:07:53
view Carder's profile

I remember seeing the couple discussing the renovation of the home on "House Beautiful TV" - those two worked very hard to remove unfortunate additions and restore the place to what it was when it was first built.

It's a shame they're not together anymore.

posted by bepsf on 2008-05-15 13:18:15
view bepsf's profile

Thanks for the condescending remarks, y'all. I, um, like, know about Neutra and stuff (twirling my hair), and from what I can recall, like, um, he did not, like, walk on water or turn water into wine and stuff like that.

He also didn't machine every piece of this house and put it together with his hands. And at this point, practically everything on the inside must have been replaced due to wear/tear/maintenance. Unless George Washington slept there, or Betsy Ross sewed her flags there, a house's value is as a place for people to eat, sleep, use the bathroom and dream. A house as a piece of art or some kind of prized commodity is silly; it is only as valuable as the function it serves.

Hey, I can sell you George Washington's cherry tree ax for only 10 million dollars. However, I should mention that I replaced the handle and the blade.

posted by hejiranyc on 2008-05-15 13:31:15
view hejiranyc's profile

"A house as a piece of art or some kind of prized commodity is silly; it is only as valuable as the function it serves."

Wow. Now architecture can't be art? I guess all that stuff in museums shouldn't be worth much since it serves no practical purpose either.

I'm glad someone was willing to pay to preserve this gem, instead of razing it like Neutra's Maslon House.

posted by nashdp on 2008-05-15 13:56:00
view nashdp's profile

Good. For $16.84 million, no one should be considering it a tear-down anymore.

posted by pvett on 2008-05-15 14:10:11
view pvett's profile

I love it when people post condescending remarks "only a trifling of glass & metal" and then get insulted when someone calls them out.

Yes, the house is just glass and metal, and Michelangelo's David is just plain white marble. We revere them because of what people DID with the materials.

And Hejiranyc - A more fitting analogy would be Jefferson and his architecture. Do you think Jeffersons contemporaries were exalting Monticello when it was built? Or is it with the lens of history that we can look back and see how truly remarkable things are? What would we see if we looked back 100 years from now and saw this house has been torn down to make way for a McMansion?

posted by Modfan on 2008-05-15 17:25:05
view Modfan's profile
Buy Text Ads