apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


DWR Up For Sale? Wallpaper Giveaway, LA Water Restrictions and The Way We Were
Los Angeles Slinks for 01.10.2009

021009atlaslinks.jpgRumors abound of Design Within Reach looking to sell their business. Other notable online news related to the house and home below: Decor8 is giving away Julia Rothman wallpaper valued at $250, Mayor Villaraigosa is asking LA residents to get stingy with their water use, and Woman's Day takes a look at how we lived in days' past...

 
 

Design Within Reach to Mull Options, Including Sale: "We have decided to evaluate alternatives that will best serve the interest of all of our shareholders, given our depressed share price," Chief Executive Ray Brunner said in a statement.

Decor8 + Hygge & West Wallpaper Giveaway: Our friend Holly over at Decor8 is giving away two rolls of $250 wallpaper to three lucky winners.

LA Residents Are Asked to Water Their Lawns Only Twice a Week: L.A. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa calls for more water restrictions on Monday.

Evolution of the Household: A fascinating look at how times have changed since 1950's till today,

Tags

Slinks, Design Within Reach, water conservation, DWR, Decor8, Villaraigosa, Woman's Day

Related Links

Share

Comments (35)

the wallpaper giveaway link is bunk!

posted by shminta on February 10th 2009 at 12:07pm
view shminta's profile

I think it's inevitable that high end retailers like DWR are going to undergo a Darwinian thinning of the ranks- there's no more fictitious vapor-wealth to be found in the form of home equity lines of credit. I think DWR drank the Kool Aid a few years ago and gambled on the notion that we have entered a new era of prosperity fueled by a seemingly endless supply of cheap money and that, despite an economy that does not produce any goods, two major wars, a humongous trade deficit and quickly-mounting national debt, everything would be just dandy in the end. Sure, people will not mind paying $1500 for a table lamp because their tract home in Phoenix just went up 50% in value last year. Yeah, that's sustainable!

posted by hejiranyc on February 10th 2009 at 12:09pm
view hejiranyc's profile

Sorry shminta, URL was missing one character when copied and pasted. Working now.

posted by gregory on February 10th 2009 at 12:09pm
view gregory's profile

I won't mind seeing DWR go out of business. Their merchandise is grossly overpriced.

posted by Jmack1 on February 10th 2009 at 12:16pm
view Jmack1's profile

if you do the research, dwr is not overpriced - most of the furniture they produce are licensed reproductions and all of it is VERY high quality, with great resale value. the furniture they sell are investments. ikea furniture is cheap because its...well, cheap.
i'm really tiring of all the complaints on this site about how expensive furniture is - quality stuff is costly and time consuming to produce. and its great to have a balance between high and low cost furniture.
i think its very poor form to be happy that a furniture establishment that produces gorgeous, high end furnishings is going out of business. some people are interested in investing in real furniture they will have forever. at the very least, its something to hope for.

posted by jaytee on February 10th 2009 at 12:33pm
view jaytee's profile

Apparently, "aspirational" retailing (i.e. the "good life" within reach) is hurting the worst of any retail category. So this isn't surprising.

posted by Lisa (Montreal) on February 10th 2009 at 12:34pm
view Lisa (Montreal)'s profile

Wow, Jaytee, hope you feel better now.

Yes, you get what you pay for, but sometimes quality just hurts the wallet too much. I doubt anyone will argue that IKEA is crap quality. I'd say the majority of us don't find it truly design within reach. $4000 for a sofa and lamps going for $500-$1000???? Stuff that I will tire of in 5-10 years isn't worth it.

I think it's fair that people here gripe about DWR prices. This is apartment therapy. I think the demographic tends to be people just starting out and to aybe 10 years out from that.

posted by Expat Decorator on February 10th 2009 at 1:07pm
view Expat Decorator's profile

Sorry Jaytee, but while I agree that quality furniture is more time consuming to produce, there is a difference between exceptional quality (hand made furniture) and mass produced big name items. An Eames lounger is not hard to come by. A molded plywood chair is not made by hand. The Dover credenza, for example, has about the same quality as a Bo Concept piece and are pumped out as fast as people can buy them. Don't fool yourself thinking that you are getting exceptional quality from DWR just because the price is high. If you want quality, go to furniture makers who make one of a kind pieces- not something that you buy just so your friends recognize it from a magazine.

posted by Jmack1 on February 10th 2009 at 1:16pm
view Jmack1's profile

Is there really a DWR store currently goin out of business or is that just a photo shop creation?

posted by Dey on February 10th 2009 at 1:52pm
view Dey's profile

Unfortunately, many of the mid-century (and even modern) licensed pieces that DWR sells have increased in price at many, many times the rate of inflation, when in fact the cost of manufacturing such an item in the US to the same degree of quality should be LOWER after accounting for inflation, considering the dramatic improvements in manufacturing technique since the 50's.
A friend of mine works for Knoll, and once told me that while the licensed pieces account for a very small percent of units sold, they account for a huge proportion of net revenue.

posted by ChristopherB on February 10th 2009 at 1:52pm
view ChristopherB's profile

Wow! I would never wish any company to go out of business. I guess people are so stuck on DWR prices that they forget there are “real people” and “real families” behind the DWR brand. I think it’s a sad day when we wish for any company working hard to succeed, to go out of business. Sad day indeed.

posted by Laf24 on February 10th 2009 at 2:11pm
view Laf24's profile

Dey: that's a quicky Photoshop job...I was hoping the tacky signage would be an obvious giveaway ;)

posted by gregory on February 10th 2009 at 2:36pm
view gregory's profile

Ugg... I really, truly hate the whining about how expensive things are. If you can't afford it - don't bitch about it & don't buy it. I want a Lamborghini...but guess what? I'll probably never own one.

Besides - its furniture - you're not supposed to redecorate your house ever 6 months. Yes, a $4000 lounge chair is an investment - one that will last your entire life (and probably your kids life too)

Seriously - think about how you realistically spend your money, and how quickly it's gone: Your $30,000 car will have almost zero resale value in a decade. Your $2000 MacBook will be obsolete in five years. Your expensive designer shoes will be out of style in 5 months. And the $7 you spend on a latte and muffin every morning will cost you $2500 this year alone.

Hell, good furniture seems like the only SMART investment these days! And - seeing as modernism is well over 100 years old - I doubt you'll get tired of it 'in 5 years'.

posted by Modfan on February 10th 2009 at 3:01pm
view Modfan's profile

I'm not complaining about how expensive things are. Some furniture is worth it. But, as ChristopherB said, the huge margins on licensed furniture is completely insane. It makes me laugh that you can't open up one issue of Dwell without seeing an Eames lounger. It's like "the" chair to have if you want to prove something. Still, I hate to see people losing their jobs. I hope for their sake that DWR stays in business.

posted by Jmack1 on February 10th 2009 at 4:24pm
view Jmack1's profile

The only thing I really hate about DWR is the ridiculously ironic name they chose for their company. I have no problems with thier desire to sell $1500 coffee tables and $10,000 couches, but no one appreciates the level of disconnectedness with reality implied by calling these items "within reach."

It might be a better investment than a car, but I need a car to get to work (since I live in a city with essentially no public transport) I do not however need a scandinavian hand bent sofa with tweed upolstery that costs as much as my car.

posted by bonjourmiette on February 10th 2009 at 4:29pm
view bonjourmiette's profile

I'm not surprised Design Within Reach is going out of business. Perhaps if ANYTHING they sold was actually within the reach of real people, they wouldn't be having such a problem.

I don't want anybody to go out of business because it means people losing their jobs, but DWR should have seen this coming.

Right on bonjourmiette, btw!

posted by BadJuJu77 on February 10th 2009 at 4:33pm
view BadJuJu77's profile

Thank you, Modfan. Nice to see someone gets it.

posted by Seaside on February 10th 2009 at 4:39pm
view Seaside's profile

Thank you for posting this!

http://decor8blog.com/2009/02/05/giveaway-wallpaper-from-hygge-west/

And by the way, the value is $250 per person - it goes like this: 3 winners, 2 rolls of wallpaper each - they choose what they want from the Julia Rothman collection offered at Hygge & West.

The winners will be selected tomorrow so if you want free designer wallpaper you'll need to entry quickly.

Thank you again for slinking to this. :)

Holly

posted by decor8Holly on February 10th 2009 at 5:15pm
view decor8Holly's profile

As an employee of the company, I am totally shocked and disheartened but some of these comments.

What is really at the root of this disdain and anger, that’s what worries me.

We are retail outlet the same as target or saks fifth avenue, ikea or room and board. People chose to spend their money in ways that are pleasing and important to them, not what others think. Some people won’t blink an eye at spending $1000 for a dress, some other people its that way for their furniture and accessories. I think we would all be better off, especially at this critical juncture in our country, if we all could re-route this hostility into doing something positive… lets build each other up instead of tearing each other down (and that goes for companies too; because, what are companies made up of ? Employees with families and friends and lives just like you))

posted by friend on February 10th 2009 at 5:31pm
view friend's profile

ooooooooooooo people should save the drama for their mama's

posted by wampler on February 10th 2009 at 5:34pm
view wampler's profile

Modfan's point is one I wish more people would consider, whether discussing a high end, mid-tier or discount business. Furniture as a disposable and fashionable purchase seems the antithesis of what is being sold at DWR from my perspective; although midcentury and modern is considered "trendy" in other parts of the country, it's just part of the decor vernacular here in California and I don't see it going out of style any time soon whether anyone is sick of it or not.

I think most of the contention here is rooted from DWR's name itself, "Design Within Reach", one that invites a bit of hostility and debate, unfair or not, since "within reach" seems highly subjective. I make a modest income, but I know if I wanted something from DWR and saved up over a certain amount of time, I could indeed afford a great deal of the products offered by the retailer. I think what people mistake is "affordability" being equated with instant gratification. In the scheme of things, DWR offers accessibility to many people who would otherwise not know about certain designs and designers; I contend remarks equating their quality to lower competition. No, it's not always the real, vintage era piece, but the products they offer can and will last a lot longer than your big box store. Ontop of that, I've only received the best service when dropping in, even if all I'm doing is window shopping.

posted by gregory on February 10th 2009 at 5:50pm
view gregory's profile

DWR's actual stuff is fine, but the place could use a humbling up. The sales that aren't sales, the insane prices for accessories, the language of the catalogue, the "we precious few who understand" stance.

And Mayor Tony needs to find something else to do that raise more rates. I hope he gets voted out of office and has to get a real job.

posted by Palmetto on February 10th 2009 at 5:55pm
view Palmetto's profile

I totally agree- it’s all about the retailer’s name. You’re completely justified being upset with DWR for their name. Design Within Reach? It’s so confusing. I recently went into a Crate and Barrel, expecting to find a store full of, well, crates and barrels and was totally disappointed.

The scary thing is the deception doesn’t stop there. Retailers everywhere are trying to pull of the same tricks with their pretty illuminated signage. I can’t wait to blog about how much I hate their name and wish they would go out of business;

West Elm- not a tree in sight
Pottery Barn- where does the cow sleep?
Saks- needed a woodwind for my kids first day of band
Safeway- well, there was a stabbing at my local Safeway. I think they should be shut down because their name is a totally lie, and their produce is sooooo overpriced.

posted by Laf24 on February 10th 2009 at 8:02pm
view Laf24's profile

re: friend - i sincerely hope dwr stays afloat and you & everyone else can keep your jobs. the service i have received from dwr is great - a quality place, for sure. they have a friendly, knowledgeable staff. and fantastic furniture.
its a real shame when people want places to go out of business simply because they cant afford to shop there. bitterness is ugly.
best of luck to you - and dwr.

posted by jaytee on February 10th 2009 at 8:53pm
view jaytee's profile

does anyone know if retromodern in atlanta is out of business?

their telephone rings and rings...

their website says "new website coming soon"

http://www.retromodern.com/

posted by miaedu on February 11th 2009 at 12:56am
view miaedu's profile

Oh. My. GOD. Are we STILL belaboring the "Within Reach" part of DWr's name???

It was NEVER meant to imply a financial aspect at all... it was meant to address availability, and lead time.

We take DWR for granted now because it opened the doors to a now-ubiquitous MCM look that was previously only available to the trade, and after waiting 12 or more weeks.

And if you think DWR is still just MCM, then you haven't been paying attention to thier catalogs.

If ANYTHING spells the demise of this (and other) companies, it's the "going public" aspect of it.

And Expat--

I think your take on the AT demographic is off.

posted by patrick (the other one) on February 11th 2009 at 1:19am
view patrick (the other one)'s profile

Reading these comments and the defense of overpriced items makes me realize some modernists don't understand the very tenants of the modernism the Eames and the other's pioneered. Such a shame. I feel sorry for the employees of DWR but this is what happens when your priced for the top 1-10% of the population.

posted by iceblink on February 11th 2009 at 11:32am
view iceblink's profile

As an employee of the company let me just say...We ARE NOT going out of business. We are simply a publicly owned company that is considering the option of once again being privately owned.

Yes our furniture is high-end, licensed classics...so guess what it costs more! So if you can't afford it shop elsewhere and buy knock-offs that will last you a month.

Our name...not sure how many time this must be said, but has nothing to do with price...but bringing furniture and design that was once only available only through designers, architects and the manufacturer's representatives, directly WITHIN REACH of the public.

And finally for those of you wishing for any company to go out of business simply because you cant afford what they offer is insanely unjust. Think about your friends and family and what would happen if anyone of them lost their jobs right now...and then keep wishing our economy gets worse.

posted by las on February 11th 2009 at 7:46pm
view las's profile

Helloooooooooo. Anyone out there notice the above video link about a water shortage? http://www.insideurbangreen.org/2009/02/what-me-worry-.html

posted by Greenscaper on February 12th 2009 at 12:34pm
view Greenscaper's profile

DWR's stock hasn't gone above a dollar in months, they're desperately searching for a buyer, their catalog is infrequent and on newsprint now, and they just laid off a bunch of people at their corp office. They won't be around much longer.

posted by design on February 13th 2009 at 6:31pm
view design's profile

What?! I store where I can buy a small, ugly plastic end table for $1400 is having financial trouble? Inconceivable!

posted by Cupajo on February 14th 2009 at 8:43pm
view Cupajo's profile

Devil's advocate here. I don't think high licensing fees are something to complain about. Contrary to popular opinion, creative/intellectual property doesn't "want to be free." If a designer creates something classic and enduring, then he/she (or the company that took a chance on the once-radical design) is entitled to profit.

It's not as if the Eameses had a monopoly on chairs. You can find something else to sit in if you don't value their design enough to pay for it.

posted by Lisa (Montreal) on February 15th 2009 at 2:23pm
view Lisa (Montreal)'s profile

I find that the main issue I have with DWR is the name.

Design Within Reach? Sure not as hell within mine!

posted by modtramp on February 17th 2009 at 7:22pm
view modtramp's profile

I used to work for DWR - the reason why they chose their name was because they made it accessible for everyone to be able to purchase modern furniture by having an easy to use web page and quick shipping. It never had anything to do with price.

posted by modlover2 on February 18th 2009 at 2:11pm
view modlover2's profile

we all know WHY DWR chose it's name - but it's still a dumb name, considering their price point, and the natural conclusion 99% of people would jump to upon hearing it.

posted by design on February 18th 2009 at 5:47pm
view design's profile

Feeds

RSS icon Los Angeles

+ City Feeds