The Grammys are over and as usual, a prouder display of peacockery is seldom found on live television. It must be noted, this years presentation contained an extremely disparate range of talent— I’m having trouble in particular trying to picture Streisand rubbing elbows backstage with Eminem. And in the midst of all this, a superstar was born from a spaceship/egg. File this under Cultural Critique.
This all started with a blurb I read over the weekend. Yvonne Rainer stated this in a manifesto from 1965: “No to spectacle no to virtuosity no to transformations and magic and make believe no to glamour and transcendency of the star image.” I couldn’t disagree more, and if you google video footage of Rainer showing Richard Move a few Martha Graham steps, you’ll see how he’s riveting and she isn’t. If you think there’s a reason to climb up on a soapbox and draw a crowd, you better have something to say and an interesting way of saying it or you’re going to be lonely. Enter Lady Gaga.
I think she’s the greatest pop starlet to come down the pike in 20 years. Forget that her producers have somewhat reduced her to a womanoid. She writes her own music, plays her own piano and has a soprano belt right out of a gospel church. When you see her play live, it’s like a cross between a young Aretha Franklin and David Bowie. On Sunday, she was carried into the theater in an egg-shaped litter, hatched on stage wearing a yolk-colored dress, and then rocked the house with what is most certainly the nightclub anthem for the next year. She has more energy in the back of her ear then most of us will ever know, and is pretty much the antithesis of Yvonne Rainer’s manifesto. We’re hungry for a little magic.
What does this have to do with color for interiors? I’m not sure, other than it’s also Fashion Week here in New York, and I’m always looking for outside sources of inspiration when I get bored painting apartments. For one thing, I was half expecting Gaga to wear another “meat dress,” and I thought Sunday she actually looked kind of classy, almost like a young Catherine Deneuve from some angles. This also made me think of Michelle Obama’s inauguration gown — citrus yellow — and how that was taken to mean fresh beginnings. So, too, with Sundays performance. As dancers stripped yellow togas and threw them to the sun, it felt like rays of light in dark times.
In fashion, we’re seeing a surge of bright chemical colors lately—electric blues, acid yellows and greens. If we were to take any cues from this whatsoever, why not paint a fresh yellow breakfast room to brighten the morning?
Possible color recommendations: Farrow&Ball Dayroom Yellow 223, Citron 74;
Ralph Lauren Beach Yellow, IB71
- Mark Chamberlain, interior and decorative painter
Markchamberlainpainting.com






Nomade Express Slee...
I'm not sure that's "yellow" as much as "the standard market color for transparent latex," but okay.
I also like Lady Gaga, especially because she pays her debt to Madonna (last night on Letterman being one instance) who is the queen of all.
I didn't see Letterman to know about Gaga "paying her debt" to Madonna, but the Grammy's certainly showed her derivative side, from the platinum ponytail swinging, to the staging, to the almost painfully Madonna-like song. Not a fan.
Yawwwwn, enough of Gaga.
Love her.
There is nothing original about Gag, I mean GaGa.
Madonna did it before her and as far as the costumes go, look to Grace Jones. Though, even these ladies have minimal talent. With true talent you do not need all these gimmicks. Look at Sarah Mclaclan, Brandi Carlile, Esperanza Spalding,PJ Harvey just to name a few. But I do appreciate it from a design perspective especially Madonna's
zzzzzzzzzzzzzz...
gross.
and why do i keep this going? i had one of my NPR programs on recently--one of her former Tisch/NYU teachers called in and said Gaga was the smartest student she ever had. she knows exactly what she's doing.
i would've be more impressed if she showed up in jeans and a t-shirt (like the rest of us) riding a bicycle.
instead she ruined breakfast for me!!!!
everytime i see eggs now i got the need to puke thinking that crazy gaga is inside!!!!
I really like this site and I am a long time lurker. But I registered today just to say that to compare Lady Gaga to Aretha, who is an incredibly talented true genius and legend, is an insult to Aretha Franklin. Lady gaga has more in common with Spinal Tap than David Bowie, and that is probably an insult to Spinal Tap. Her music is just bland pop and that song she played at the Grammy's sounded a little to much like Madonna's "Express Yourself". Sorry for the rant, but she really is just a marketing ploy. Sure she knows it, but that does not make it art.
What does this have to do with color for interiors? I’m not sure
You mean it doesn't, you just felt like pimping her and have no self-restraint. :p
But I heard some hilarious things went down at the Grammys this year. YAY ARCADE FIRE. XD
Dear Miss Gaga,
Please go away.
Sincerely,
Culture.
Honestly though, I can't tell if the woman is a brilliant satirist that is pulling off an elaborate social experiment / performance art piece that is aimed at displaying how vapid and meaningless pop-culture and it's fanbase have become, or if she's just another pop-starlet who thinks she's actually a good and significant musician.
I love Lady Gaga. I think she's fun and smart and I don't care if she's original or derivative-she's damn entertaining.
I rarely comment on something here but this time I have to do it: I really think that this girl is a bad copy of The Queen Madonna and I mean real copy; clothing, dancing, strategies and music! I don't understand why the media wants to create a star when the star has to have something unique and talent. Obviously the craving for money is behind this because as far as I see nobody cares about the person you try to impose on us. Let's people decide. Madonna is famous NOW. Don't try to convince the population otherwise. We like the innovation and true talent no, I insist, bad copies imposed by the tycoons of the music (why they want that?)
Smart the lady meat? If it were, it wouldn't have to copy everything from Madonna.
Why does this respectful site about decoration supports this copy girl? Isn't it enough with the comments that people make about not caring at all about this person? Now, even, this site tries to impose someone who is not cared about by anybody but teens who are against everything and try to convince themselves that speaking about this meat wearer will upset the rest of the people? (because even they themselves don't think that it is art; it's just a way of annoying the others by mentioning this person)
Why this site is wasting our time speaking about who we don't care at all? Has this site changed the subject and now it is about new promises of art? It is really disgusting to compare Aretha or Madonna with this!
Try to understand; I won't buy any CD or piece of music from "the walking meat" who thinks is innovative: I think she could be whatever but Queen of Music; That's is only Madonna's place who has proven she has talent and quality (all over the years) no just a simple fad which is absolutely temporary. What a way of wasting our time and money posting things about the performance of a person whom we don't like to hear about!
The crazy people are the smartest; just see the IQ of the most famous criminals. They always ended up bad. Besides this nobody cares wheter if she was a good student or not. I don't care at all. Do you?
What a way of wasting our time and energy speaking about what we aren't interested in. I think I will stop reading this site!
I am really upset because of your writing about other subject but decoration (and the subject is not liked, at least, by me and many other loyal readers of this site!). Let's respect the readers and the people who are made it in the showbusiness with their talent! How do you dare to compare this "walking meat" with Aretha Franklin or with Madonna! It is unbelievable!
Obviously the guy who wrote the article likes her and tries to make everyone like her! ough! I can't believe my eyes! You allowed this person to talk about her and not focus on the subject matter of this site? Doesn't anyone check what the contributors write? You have to do your duties!