I may go so far as to say that I am a bibliophile and definitely a traditionalist when it comes to books. I have successfully avoided consolidating into an e-reader as of now, which creates the problem of having far too many books and far too little space.
That being said, I’m also getting married soon, and will face the task of combining the book collections of two avid readers. The task is daunting, so I’m always on the lookout for new ways of displaying my paper treasures. Readers love their books and can be creative with the way they display them in both form and function.
Shown above:
1. On my bookshelves, I like to group monochromatic colors with other objects of the same likeness. I feel that grouping like-colors creates a bolder statement and moves the eye. Here, I grouped an array of cloth-bound blue and black novels with my old Polaroid camera for a vintage feel.
2. This photo shows other areas of the color-sorted bookshelf in my living room. I like to alternate between books stacked and on their sides so that each group stands out.
3. This is a great way to create the illusion of more space. By sectioning off a room with a strategically placed and creatively designed bookshelf, former decoration editor of Domino Magazine, Tori Mellott, forms an office and a living space within one room.
4. Despite the fact that it probably won’t help with organizing books, this great Stacked Paperback Wallpaper by Tracy Kendall, available at Anthropologie is a great way to pay homage to the written word.
5. Not a reader? Fake it with wall graphic decals, like this colorful one from Blik.
Images: Stacked books by Andie Wurster, Color-sorted bookshelf by Andie Wurster, office and bookshelf from Domino Magazine, wallpaper from Anthropologie, wall graphic from Blik.





Comments (35)
I love how these look, too:
http://www.amazon.com/Conceal-INVISIBLE-BOOKSHELF-floating-shelf/dp/B000UO4KXY
Or make your own:
http://www.wikihow.com/Create-Invisible-Shelves
I know #4 is wallpaper but I've seen real book stacks in some of the interiors featured on this site. That never made sense to me. Isn't it annoying having to get a book out of the middle or the bottom of the stack?
Thanks for this! We're moving soon and can always use ideas on how to best display our books without things getting too visually cluttered.
The concept of shelving by color just doesn't work for me. What do you do when you want to grab a household reference book - or something to be read - or something to loan to someone?
I can't always remember the color of the spine of a book. If everything is grouped somewhat by topic it may not be as visually pleasing...but to me it's better than looking thru multiple stacks of books to find what I want.
I love cubitec, its strong and large enough to accomodate the biggest coffee table photography book I own. Books look really good on it especially with some decorative items mixed in. Sapien is also good in a limited space, can hold 50 to 70 books, I like to stack by size.
I don't understand the resistance some avid readers to ebooks. I personally rather use my limited book storage space for beautiful design, art, antique/vintage and cookbooks. Not for the random novel I took one weekend to read. I can also carry unlimited reading material with me at all times, but especially while traveling and can access reference materials from practically any computer.
"the problem of far too many books" -- what a delicious problem to have!
i also love to read, because i love the stories. and if i love a book and will want to read it multiple times, i am happy to buy a paper copy. but i am a total kindle convert, especially for the books that i burn my way through and will only read once. and i am now of the opinion that people who say they just can't do e-books don't really love to read. they just like to say that they do.
these methods seem to highlight the book as an object. they don't seem to be especially functional for quickly locating a book you want to read again. but i suppose AT is often about form over function.
This is my first time on this site. As an apartment dweller I find it quite useful. Just to comment, as a researcher I too would describe myself as an avid reader. If I didn't have an e-reader, I would have nowhere to sleep or sit or eat...I would be overcome by books. I would like to see something that is both lovely and utilitarian
I haven't converted to ebooks either because 1) staring at electronic devices for long periods of time hurts my eyes (even with glasses) 2) I like the tradition of actually having a paper book to hold, feel. Ebooks feel fleeting to me (not the industry, the actual story). Call me old fashioned :)
I wish I could post a photo. I have converted my grandmother's china hutch into my book case and meditation altar. Books and treasures...cuz this girl "ain't got no china".
I'm with erinstl and mauishopgirl - I love knowing that I can carry a couple of thousand books with me at all times on my kindle.
However, I still prefer to have cookbooks and reference books in paper form. Plus, I have a lot of books that are like old friends and I just keep them around me, even if I also own them in digital forms. And there are still some books I want to read that are not available in e-form. So, I still have lots of books.
I love the way shelving by color looks, but I just don't see how it can be functional. If all your books fit in one bookcase, maybe it could work, kind of, but not if you have a lot of books. There are, just for one example, 21 books in the Patrick O'Brian series and the spines are in 3 or 4 different color families. Plus, I have 10 or 15 reference books for that one series, and they are different colors. How could it make sense to shelve these all separately?
Then there are books I've bought but haven't read. If I didn't keep them all in one spot, they'd disappear into a lovely rainbow of books and I wouldn't be able to 'shop' my own shelves when I want something new to read.
And reference books - if you want to look up something, how can it make sense to look in the blue stack for one source and, then, rummage around the red stack for another.
So, although it looks very pretty, it just doesn't make sense to me. I guess, I'm more of a reader than a design buff.
I can't get on the e-reader bandwagon either. Reading is too much of a tactile experience for me - the musty smell of an old book, the feel of the pages between my fingers... There's also the fact that a paper book doesn't run out of battery power. ;-)
But I could never arrange my books by color. By genre and author's last name is the way to go. I read, re-read, and lend out my books so much that I need to have a good idea of where they all are. ;-)
"...successfully avoided consolidating into an e-reader..."
/rolleyes
Dead tree books are so last century.
Sorry but bibliophile and grouping books by color don't fit in the same sentence. If you're really a bibliophile you know that is impossible to organize a library that way.
@crayfish
Oooh, thanks for letting me know. A vertical bookshelf sounds like a GREAT idea for my <400 square foot apartment that already has two regular bookcases. They're just about filled up and I was wondering what to do.
@Sam I Am
If you prefer e-readers, cool. But no reason to put down those of us who prefer traditional books. If I was buying all my books electronically, I'd be real worried about how Amazon's tendency to remote-delete certain titles right off people's Kindles (including, ironically, 1984). If Amazon can do it, so can others. Technology isn't always the answer to everything.
I don't group my books by color either, but I've heard it's a great idea for people who are very visual.
I tend to group books by size and that's it. And people think I'm anal for doing that. By color would be quite a task!
I also find I love the artwork from book covers and have at least 5 book covers that I located the artwork for and framed in my home.
I registered just to post this! Color sorting and bibliophile CAN work... it just depends on your relationship to your collection. I have one group of books (maybe 2-3 bookshelves worth) that I know so well I was able to color sort without loosing my ability to find anything. But I also have a very visual and visceral memory for books...
'the New York Regional Mormon Singles Halloween Dance' has got to be the best title for a book - ever.
Ok.. not putting anyone down here but just to convert some of our lovely readers over to the dark side .....
I can only speak for the kindle but the technology hype works, there's no backlight, no glare so I can read it for a long time with no discomfort. Even longer because its much lighter than a hardcover. Its not like looking at a computer screen, smartphone or tablet, completely different.
I love the feel of books too but.. I don't love having to store or donate the several paperbacks I read a week. Or having to make space to store books I have bought but haven't read yet. All e reader lovers still have libraries and collections too, its a supplement not a complete replacement. I still get to enjoy the tactile pleasure of opening up a wonderful new art or cook book. I do buy hardcopy novels from the thrift store for $2 each but I won't buy a hardcopy novel for $24 when I can get it for $10 on my kindle, especially if it will be a toss once I'm done.
The kindle battery lasts for weeks & weeks, I'm not kidding. Its not like a cell phone where you have to charge it daily.
Those of us who love e readers also still love books, we always will. Every one of my friends who were resistant eventually received one as a gift and did a complete 180, love their kindle now, can't believe they were so against it. But I have to say I didn't like the nook very much.
@ELFay: Amazon is only one of many manufacturers and retailers of ebooks and ebook readers. I own a Sony. In my particular case, my Sony has no 3G or WIFI capabilities and I do not use the Sony software on my computer... so there's no possible way anyone but me can delete one of my ebooks. Even if one of my ebooks is somehow deleted, I have my elibrary backed up to another hard drive, a thumb drive, and Dropbox.
Paper books or ebook, the medium shouldn't matter, it's the content that counts. Personally, I like being able to carry an entire library in something the size of a small paperback that weighs no more than 10 oz. I love the ability to scale the font (hooray for aging eyes) and the ability to double tap a word to bring up the definition. Of course ebooks are so much more environmentally friendly than their paper counterparts since ebooks don't physically exist; no paper or ink used.
Ebooks, paper books, papyrus scrolls, animal skins... it's all good, as long as people are reading.
When it comes to displaying paper books, I favor the good old-fashioned bookcase with books sorted by subject, author, title.
Oh, wanted to mention too, the thing with 1984 & Amazon. It was a digital rights issue, not censorship. They found the publisher didn't have the rights to distribute electronically. Amazon did err, they didn't properly notify readers of the pull and also their internal controls didn't catch it before the book was even offered.
There are still other publishers' 1984 available.
(I'm not getting into the e-reader/paper book debate, I just don't have a well informed opinion yet.)
I love the way these images mix objects with books and use both as art. I have a very hard time accomplishing this, but these photos help me see how it can be done so well, and all is done with a great sense of scale.
I am a recovering book hoarder ... Took up way too much space hoarding books and had scarce little space in which to live. However, I cannot seem to get on board with paying for a book via ereader that I am then unable to pass along to the next bibliophile.
i love reading and books and am perfectly happy grouping by color. I tend to have a visual memory of what books look like and therefore find them fairly easily.
on style #3, where you use a book shelf as a room divider, which way would the book spines face though? seems like it would look horrible in one direction.
Apologies for possibly pulling the discussion off course!
@ mauishopgirl
Right, but the fact still remains that Amazon was able to do it.
I have nothing against e-reads. I realize they're a great option for some people. It just annoys me when some users get all snobby about it (like this woman Anne on Unclutterer a few weeks ago who was knocking "book hoarders" and advocating slicing the books up, running them through a scanner, and then disposing of them).
Just had to share this; it's for people who don't want e-readers because they'll miss the smell of books (no, this is not serious):
Smell of Books™ is available in five designer aromas. There’s a Smell of Books™ scent for every type of book lover.
* New Book Smell
* Classic Musty
* Scent of Sensibility
* Eau, You Have Cats
* Crunchy Bacon Scent
http://smellofbooks.com/aromas/
Love the vintage Nintendo! That takes me back.
not a reader?
GO BUY A BOOK!
For those wondering why I prefer not to convert to an e-reader, I will tell you that my background is in publishing. E-Readers threaten publishers' places in book commerce, and I prefer not to contribute to the possibility of my friends losing their jobs. Also, I think the physical book adds so much character to your home. People can tell who you are by what you read.
That said, I'm also a very visual person, and remember the color of the book and cover design before the author's name nearly every time.
Hope this clears everything up.
love this
@rubymore: I agree that you can do that (sort books by color) if you have a very good visual memory and/or do it to some selected books but in this household we have about one thousand books and it would be impossible (for us) to find anything if we dind't use the "old fashioned" way.
"E-Readers threaten publishers' places in book commerce"
Didn't they say the same of MP3s vs CDs? :)
I use ebooks for some textbooks, cookbooks and a set of classic poetry.
I have had to control my book hoards, by donating most to libraries.
I keep the volumes that matter beyond the contents (or more likely, the physical limits of my shelves), organize by a somewhat understandable system, and use the local library, and others with interlibrary loan.
One thing that came up in discussion was sometimes an ebook can rival a hardback in cost.
This would be fine, if that meant the author was making a larger percentage.
Anyone KNOW?