apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Best Product: Brita Faucet Mount Water Filter

2005_3_28_britta.jpgClean water act. We have used and not used many water filters over the years. While we hate the added expense, we love the noticeably better water they provide and we have always stopped short of going whole hog and installing an undercounter system in our rental.

In all of this, we have found the best ready-to-go water filter to be the Brita Faucet Mount Filter with the nice chrome top. Here's why:

 
 

  • Brita's faucet mount shape is the best for working in the sink (it keeps out of your way - much better than PUR)
  • Brita has a nice switch on theirs that allows you to switch back and forth from filtered to unfiltered water easily
  • The faucet mount is the best space saving solution (pitchers don't work for us)
  • The chrome top looks good
  • The chrome top doesn't show dirt
  • Brita filters seem to last longer than the PUR ones we used to use

    They are still pricey. Here's the official seller ($36.99). MGR

    (Re-edited from an original post dated 03.28.05)

  • Tags

    air & water quality

    Related Links

    Share

    Comments (23)

    Thanks MGR. A very timely tip. I have recently tired of lugging the pitcher back and forth to the refrigerator to fill up the in-the-door spigotted contraption, and was starting the online search for the best of show in this category. This saved me much time.

    posted by dorio on 2005-03-28 17:00:01

    My apartment doesn't have enough water pressure. I know other people in NYC with the same problem.

    posted by karenw on 2005-03-28 17:45:52

    How slow are these things? It takes maybe 30-50 seconds to fill a glass with my PUR faucet mount.

    posted by a geek on 2005-03-28 18:04:04

    this might be stating the obvious, but try replacing the filter cartridge when it gets slow.

    i had a PUR filter and it would have the same problem--even when the indicator seemed to show a third or more of useful life remaining on the cartridge it would be impossibly slow to fill up a glass of water.

    if you replace the filter it will run as expected & taste much much fresher. i've had both (PUR and Brita) and find the Brita cartridges last longer.

    posted by sam on 2005-03-28 23:36:30

    i have a questions- i'd like to get a faucet mounted purifier, but my sink is pretty shallow and the faucet hangs pretty low, leaving only about 10" between the faucet and the bottom of the sink. i'm concerned that once i mount one of these things, i won't be able to fit stuff under the faucet (big soup pot, flower vase, etc.) any suggestions?

    posted by seema on 2005-03-29 09:08:47

    Hi! I love our Brita Filter. The filter unit is mounted on the side of the faucet so it lowers the faucet spout by about 1 1/2".

    I'm glad there's a chrome one - I'll definitely get one if and when we need ours replaced ( I have the all white one).

    posted by Lani on 2005-03-29 09:50:15

    I also like the idea some fridge manufacturers are trying... integrating purified water into the "through the door water & ice" feature.

    posted by patrick (the other one) on 2005-03-29 15:14:38

    I had this exact same filter... and I give it two thumbs up!

    It's by far the best and most convenient water filter I have had/tried to date. The filter chargers are small, cheap and last for like 4 months!

    The water quality is way better and tastes much better as well, comparable to just about any bottled water (at least mine did, your results may vary).

    Note: If you have hard water (like me) DO NOT boil this filter unit in vinegar! (like my wife did). While that might take mineral deposits off of pots and metal... the plastic filter will MELT and warp.

    I now have a regular Brita, which is also nice.

    posted by Pete ( modernflat.com ) on July 9th 2007 at 11:04am
    view Pete ( modernflat.com )'s profile

    Necrothread.

    Consumer Reports did a feature on in-home water filtration not too long ago. The Brita pitchers did not do very well compared to the faucet models.

    posted by MrGreen on July 9th 2007 at 11:27am
    view MrGreen's profile

    i prefer the pitcher, only cos the fridge keeps the water nice and cold. i'd have to run my cold water faucet for a while, thus wasting water, to achieve the same result. but if i go sink-mounted, this one is sure purty.

    posted by miffy on July 9th 2007 at 11:27am
    view miffy's profile

    I have this unit and yes, its slow, however, instead of having to use a Brita pitcher, I just fill my ice cube trays with faucet water filtered through this unit and when I want cold water, I use the cubes and fille the glass the same way.

    Saves a fortune!

    posted by JacksonMarie on July 9th 2007 at 12:13pm
    view JacksonMarie's profile

    I have the PUR faucet filter, but i'm thinking of jumping ship to the Brita party as the PUR filter slows considerably after about 3 weeks... then again, i do go through a lot of water.

    As for the pitcher argument... I keep a 1 gallon jug of filtered water in the fridge for when i want cold water. Just fill it up from the faucet filter and leave in the fridge. Best of both worlds with no more clutter and I don't have to run ice cold water through my coffee machine (coffee comes out hotter with tap temp i find)

    posted by phil on July 9th 2007 at 1:06pm
    view phil's profile

    I really recommend an undercounter system. I rent, and plan to take mine with me when I move. It wasn't difficult at all to install. (Really! And I felt daunted by the prospect at first, but it's actually.... a cinch. Everything you need comes with the unit, hot and cold water pipes are easy to identify, etc.) I didn't know what to do with the spray faucet that I removed to make room for my filtered water faucet. - So, imperfectionist that I am, I just left it connected under the sink, ready to re-install whenever I remove the filter system when I move.

    Anyway, I've got the Aquasana water filter. When I was researching this a few years ago, that seemed like the best choice for Manhattan. I'd choose a different one for the country. And while I was at it, I got the Aquasana shower filter, as well.... It is soooo worth it to have good drinking water at home, and it seems cheaper in the long run than buying bottled water (not that I was doing that before, so I guess I can't count that as a personal savings, ehh?).
    By the way, the pitcher systems do nothing to remove the things you most want to remove from your water - you need a system that uses pressure to do that.

    posted by Sea on July 9th 2007 at 1:12pm
    view Sea's profile

    Cold water was never a problem, I bought a really nice water pitcher (that the wife broke, for real... she's clumsy but I love her none the less) that I filled with the filtered water and kept in the fridge.

    That way you can let the pitcher fill at it's own pace and have enough cold water on hand to fill several glasses (say when you have guests)... and the ice cube idea was good also.

    Boomer, I think my wife wanted to clean up the whole unit... the little screen on the bottom and where the water tends to dry on the filter... we've got really hard water here (Belgrade).

    posted by Pete ( modernflat.com ) on July 9th 2007 at 1:16pm
    view Pete ( modernflat.com )'s profile

    Pete,

    I have a chrome PUR faucet-mounted filter and I soak (but never boil!) the unit in vinegar every month or so to remove the hard water deposits from the plastic casing and screen. I haven't had any problems.

    posted by WendyInIndy on July 9th 2007 at 1:40pm
    view WendyInIndy's profile

    I gotta disagree having had both the Brita and the Pur I determined I like the taste of the Pur better, although this aspect may very with local water supply (didn't have problems with the Pur slowing down that others have had although my water pressure is good). Also I didn't like the switch on the Brita, which was the first of the units I used, it is really small and was the main reason I switched to the big old style Pur where you swiveled the whole head, then later when they had the other Pur version at Costco w/ three filters I picked that up and couldn't be happier. Either way, since I don't like ice cold water these are way better for me then a pitcher version.

    posted by EJO on July 9th 2007 at 4:42pm
    view EJO's profile

    Hopefully everyone realizes that impurities in your drinking water should be your last step if you are doing this for health concerns. You absorb a lot more crap while taking a shower and studies indicate the risk of exposure is far greater from the water you use to wash than the water you drink.

    posted by joebelt on July 9th 2007 at 5:04pm
    view joebelt's profile

    joebelt,
    That's very true - the VOCs get breathed in from the steam, which makes them dangerous in the lungs (not to mention the skin easily absorbs a lot of stuff, as well). But it's very hard to develop filters that work well with both hot water and high pressure. As I mentioned above, I use a shower filter. But I also take quick showers. That's probably the best (and cheapest) thing to do.

    posted by Sea on July 9th 2007 at 5:49pm
    view Sea's profile

    Anyone else a fan of the Brita tank that goes in the fridge? It holds a lot more water than the pitchers (less refilling) and dispenses water with just the flick of a finger (less effort). It does take up quite a bit of space in the fridge but my girlfriend and I haven't found that to be a problem. If anything, the space constraint encourages frequent editing of the contents of the fridge, which is a good thing.

    posted by engineergirl on July 9th 2007 at 6:04pm
    view engineergirl's profile

    I use the filters for only three reasons:

    1. Slightly better tasting water

    2. Convenience - No lugging bottled water up the stairs and worrying when I have to get more

    3. It's much cheaper than Bottled water.

    As for poisoning myself with bath/wash water... no one lives forever, you might as well smell nice while your alive! :)

    posted by Pete ( modernflat.com ) on July 9th 2007 at 11:02pm
    view Pete ( modernflat.com )'s profile

    I found the Brita a little clunky - Switching from regular-brita-spray seemed to loosen the system each time, having to stop to tighten it again.
    Also, our water pressure is low (about 18 psi), so a glass of water took about 15 seconds or so to fill. When you have 5 people waiting for a glass of water on a hot summer day, that 15 seconds is precious.
    Combined with these two faults was the price of replacing the filter.
    I have recently switched back to my good-ole Brita jug.

    posted by Dave L. on July 10th 2007 at 2:45am
    view Dave L.'s profile

    If you have the dough a reverse osmosis system on your main water line is the way to go...

    posted by joebelt on July 10th 2007 at 3:12am
    view joebelt's profile

    When I lived in NYC my Pur would only last a few weeks at best and by the second week it drippppppped.

    When I moved back to NC, my Pur lasted 3 or 4 times as long.

    I don't know, but we just blamed it on old NYC pipes or poluted water.

    posted by elizabet on July 10th 2007 at 4:28am
    view elizabet's profile

    Feeds

    RSS icon New York

    + City Feeds