apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


DNA mini portraits

photogallery_mini_3.jpg

DNA11 makes personalized art from your DNA or fingerprints. We've before posted about the fingerprint portraits from DNA11. They've just introduced a new line of more affordable DNA Art--a smaller scale version of their DNA portraits.

 
 

photogallery_mini_1.jpg

The larger DNA portraits start at $390 while this mini version starts at $169.

Here's how it works (We've condensed the steps here, the longer version is here.)


  1. After ordering online, you'll get a DNA collection kit with instructions in the mail.

  2. You send your sample back to the DNA11 lab.

  3. They extract your DNA and run it on a gel

  4. Capture the raw digital image from the gel (then destroy your DNA sample)

  5. Back at DNA11 Headquarters, they digitally enhance and customize the DNA image

  6. Print, frame and send the artwork to you


Tags

artwork

Related Links

Share

Comments (15)

This is really cool. I've been looking for DNA gel art.

posted by corin on December 2nd 2008 at 3:09pm
view corin's profile

I also remember reading that they can combine two people's DNA to get a portrait of the images overlapping... very cool.

posted by TheGoodBiGirl on December 2nd 2008 at 3:16pm
view TheGoodBiGirl's profile

Just note, running a gel is very toxic. If you are considering artwork that is environmentally conscious, this is not for you. I see they donate tho, which is good :)

posted by Hollie on December 2nd 2008 at 3:23pm
view Hollie's profile

You know, this is probably pretty easy to fake out, since most human dna is actually identical.

posted by Oren Mazor on December 2nd 2008 at 3:34pm
view Oren Mazor's profile

How would you ever know if it's yours or not? And, why would it matter?

posted by Griffin on December 2nd 2008 at 4:00pm
view Griffin's profile

Hollie, running a polyacrylamide gel is not toxic. You just need for acrylamide to solidify into the gel and then it is a safe substance. Besides, that is if they ARE running high-rez polyacrylamide. I bet they are just running agarose gels which are totally safe, anyway you slice it. Besides, they are sending out a photo of the gel, not the gel itself. I can think of several reasons an oil painting would be considered more toxic.

posted by verasue on December 2nd 2008 at 4:06pm
view verasue's profile

yeah... i highly doubt those are acrylamide gels... and for $169!?!?!?! I can digest and run my own DNA for next to nothing =) (not that I would abuse lab privileges and waste reagents)

how do you even know that they're even running your DNA and not just taking pictures of randoms?

posted by discomonkey on December 2nd 2008 at 5:01pm
view discomonkey's profile

Look for this to appear in a CSI episode. Investigators have a search warrant, but not a warrant to collect a DNA sample. They simply take the DNA art off the wall.

posted by Jon_B on December 2nd 2008 at 5:08pm
view Jon_B's profile

Oren Mazor yes most DNA is similar however there are places where there is variation (ie RFLP) and if you use special enzymes to cut at certain places you can get gene maps that are quite unique. Sure this is a possible fake out but this is not why this is a bad idea.

First I wouldnt trust them to destroy the DNA sample. They could be a racket to get DNA samples for a pharmaceutical company. This is completely ripe for abuse. I would never to do this. Its like someone asking to for your SSN to make pixilated artwork out of your SSN number. This is not smart at all.

posted by Trumystique on December 2nd 2008 at 5:32pm
view Trumystique's profile

Narcissim, meet Technology.

posted by jooly on December 2nd 2008 at 5:36pm
view jooly's profile

hmmmm...I bet AT is is in on the conspiricy as well - they're being paid by Big Pharma to 'advertise' this cool new product to increase DNA collection from unsuspecting customers....it's all clear now...

posted by Grumpy Girl on December 2nd 2008 at 5:47pm
view Grumpy Girl's profile

I used a bunch of DNA portraits for my MFA submission...now you guys have me wondering whose they were and if their privacy is being violated...man, and they thought Maplethorpe was controversial.

posted by DrRubyDoomsday on December 2nd 2008 at 5:51pm
view DrRubyDoomsday's profile

I don't like it :-p Maybe bcz I've seen that image so much that I just think "work" not "art" when I look at it.

posted by nutterbuddy on December 2nd 2008 at 10:34pm
view nutterbuddy's profile

I had no idea there was a market for this stuff, and that these companies can get away with charging so much money for it. I know what I'll be doing if my career as a biologist doesn't work out :)

And I agree, the gels are not toxic if they're taken care of properly. The ethidium bromide used to visualize the DNA is a mutagen, but it can be neutralized and disposed of without exposing anyone directly, and the amounts used are very low.

posted by itsakitty on December 3rd 2008 at 12:42am
view itsakitty's profile

Maybe if I didn't look at these every day for a living, it would hold some appeal. The price seems a bit steep, I could make one of these for probably $20.

posted by tarah on December 3rd 2008 at 10:25am
view tarah's profile