apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


ColorTherapy: Kip's Bay Decorator Show House

kips-bay-01.jpg
kips-bay-thumbs.jpg

I poked my head into the 37th annual Kip's Bay Decorator Show House — for starters, the site this year is the much talked-about former home of Salander-O'Reilly Galleries, on the market for a very dear $75 million. Even at a glance, it's fit for European royalty and proves why all these faux-Normandy McMansions aren't worth their price in salt...

 
 

Colorwise, there is no sense in trend-spotting here, as these seasoned pros do what they do best and follow gut instincts rather than current market flavors of the moment. Styles range from traditional, transitional to go-green and ultra mod.

DESIGNERS
Room 1 Jamie Drake
Room 2 Lichten Craig
Room 3 William T.Georgis
Room 4 Coleman Sanchez
Room 5 Charlotte Moss

Room 6 Joe Nye
Room 7 Matthew Smyth
Room 8 St. Charles. The basement-level kitchen by St. Charles, replete with grand piano, winter garden and his-and-her sautee stations. The fantasy of course is that the two of you could saunter downstairs for supper snacks with dueling chefs and tinkling piano music, in a neutral palette. This is true luxury, without the 50K square feet of wall-to-wall, chintz or beaded tassels.

Kip's Bay Decorator Show House
Admission is $30, which includes the Journal and Source Book. Group Admission is $25 per person for groups of 20 people or more. General admission tickets may be purchased at the door, upon arrival. No entry 1/2 hour before closing. Children under 6 (including infants) and pets are not admitted.
22 East 71st Street, New York
4/17 - 5/17

Go now, and for further annotation see the Kip's Bay website. Thanks all at Harriet Weintraub for photos.

Tags

ColorTherapy, Sales & Events Calendar

Related Links

Share

Comments (20)

Some of those rooms are outstanding...
...and others are downright scary.

posted by bepsf on May 12th 2009 at 11:02am
view bepsf's profile

I didn't see outstanding. I saw lots of scary.

And what kind of tour bans infants?!

posted by sally305 on May 12th 2009 at 11:12am
view sally305's profile

pictures 3, 4 and 5 are interesting but the rest of the rooms either didn't photograph well or are pretty blah.

posted by bcthree on May 12th 2009 at 11:12am
view bcthree's profile

I love and hate number three so much.

posted by kiljoywashere on May 12th 2009 at 11:25am
view kiljoywashere's profile

Maybe just the images were poorly shot or this was all designed in the dark. But, I must say this is a very sad representation of the 'best' professionals in new york.

posted by fringestudio on May 12th 2009 at 11:27am
view fringestudio's profile

#7: Matthew Smyth & Gloria Vanderbilt (the re-creation of her childhood bedroom). Not that it makes a difference.

posted by wally3 on May 12th 2009 at 11:43am
view wally3's profile

i agree fringestudio. the work done by folks in the small cool contest was far more interesting. these rooms are either safe and cold or weird and extreme (#3) without adding a new idea to the design vocabulary.

posted by cometz on May 12th 2009 at 11:44am
view cometz's profile

"And what kind of tour bans infants?!"

The kind of tour displaying a house filled with art, antiques and fine furnishings - items that can be easily damaged by children (and vice versa)

BTW - I don't think an infant or toddler is going to miss out on not seeing a showhouse...

posted by bepsf on May 12th 2009 at 12:00pm
view bepsf's profile

I want to know who made the painting in #3. can anyone identify it?

This place is pretty awesome. Is that a real dog, caged up in #4?

posted by kevoncubine on May 12th 2009 at 12:05pm
view kevoncubine's profile

meh. I don't love any of it. Even the ones I appreciate still leave me cold. Was it a cloudy day when the pics were taken? It's not even fun to love or hate #3 since that's clearly where they were headed with it. It's really not all that shocking.

posted by kelleyk on May 12th 2009 at 12:32pm
view kelleyk's profile

kevoncubine, since pets (& infants) aren't allowed admission, maybe this is a dog that attempted to sneak in?

posted by timmy jr. on May 12th 2009 at 12:38pm
view timmy jr.'s profile

The thing about Kips Bay is being in the rooms. They weren't designed solely to be photgraphed. You really need to be in them in order to judge how they feel and how successful they are. Also, the very best materials and finishes are used, the best workmanship and faux finishes. There is a lot to learn in the details of showhouses. When I lived in New York I voluntreered to docent the show so I could spend more time there. The more you look, the more you see. I will never regret time or money spent on Kips Bay, that's for sure. It's always fun, even when there are rooms that really don't work.

posted by dandy on May 12th 2009 at 1:55pm
view dandy's profile

"The kind of tour displaying a house filled with art, antiques and fine furnishings - items that can be easily damaged by children (and vice versa)

BTW - I don't think an infant or toddler is going to miss out on not seeing a showhouse..."

It's not about the children's potential enjoyment of the showhouse. It's about making it possible for interested people to attend. Many such people are parents. I wouldn't dream of bringing mobile, curious young children to something like this. But a newborn in a Baby Bjorn is not going to hurt anything.

posted by sally305 on May 12th 2009 at 1:59pm
view sally305's profile

Sally--

If they allow you to come in the house w/ your sleeping angel in a baby backpack, they also have to allow the next person with their screaming banshee in a 3-wheeled monster-stroller grabbing at the tablecloths, smearing jelly on the damask and barfing on the Aubusson...

Parents have to make sacrifices for having children - This is one of many you'll face in the next 18-24 years, but you do have a choice: Get a sitter or don't go.

posted by bepsf on May 12th 2009 at 2:45pm
view bepsf's profile

I was there yesterday and I CAN NOT believe you chose not to show Charles Pavarini's room-was the best by FAR!!!!

posted by amandaR on May 12th 2009 at 4:18pm
view amandaR's profile

bepsf,

I have teenagers. I've been there. It's no big deal--I've just never seen a specific prohibition against infants before. I found it mildly interesting.

To your point, though, I have seen plenty of adults with worse manners than three-year-olds. The fine furnishings in this home are probably at greater risk from people like them than from children of paranoid parents who don't want to pay for a broken Ming vase.

posted by sally305 on May 12th 2009 at 5:46pm
view sally305's profile

My favorite was Bunny Williams's room. She is a real pro and I agree about the importance of being in the rooms. It is so different that I will never read a shelter mag in the same way again.
Tied for first was that incredible kitchen: a whole area for espresso!! Seriously though half the experience was the interplay of textures. I'm working on an essay about it for the Jewish Press.

posted by shoshana on May 13th 2009 at 10:05am
view shoshana's profile

Re: the last pic with the pull out bench - would your chin even reach the counter if you sat there?

posted by lorettalynn on May 15th 2009 at 12:41pm
view lorettalynn's profile

Picture 3 is rad. It's The Shinning meets A Clockwork Orange. Detective marries the serial killer. I think it's sexy.

posted by itookfencing on May 15th 2009 at 12:55pm
view itookfencing's profile

Cool... except there are plenty of alternatives for that piece of abstract art :)

posted by Ianny on May 16th 2009 at 12:04am
view Ianny's profile

Feeds

RSS icon New York

+ City Feeds