apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Hot or Not? Chester Tufted Lamps by Bert & Dennis

12-8-chester-lamp-1.jpg

There's a lot of love for Chesterfield Tufted Sofas currently and Dutch design duo Bert & Dennis are ready to take full advantage of the trend. They've created the Chester Lamp for Belgian company, Dark...

 
 

12-8-chester-lamp-2.jpg

12-8-chester-lamp-3.jpg

Design by Bert van der Grift and Dennis van der Burch of Bert & Dennis. Via: contemporist

Tags

Hot or Not?, lighting, tufted, table lamp, pendant, Chesterfield

Related Links

Share

Comments (29)

There's something about the shape of these that gives me an ill feeling...like the lamps are overweight people wearing clothes that are waaay too tight. They're just so visually heavy for something that is suspended in the air.

posted by ChristopherB on December 8th 2008 at 2:08pm
view ChristopherB's profile

Wearing a straight jacket or being strapped to the chair is a much more effective design solution than padding your lamps.

posted by quiltmaster on December 8th 2008 at 2:15pm
view quiltmaster's profile

yuck.

posted by indiasoup on December 8th 2008 at 2:20pm
view indiasoup's profile

The hanging lamps are okay. The table lamps, not so much.

posted by insanity_pepper on December 8th 2008 at 2:23pm
view insanity_pepper's profile

I would not decorate your home or mine with these lamps.
And I do love a tufted chesterfield sofa, wing back chair or hassock as an acent, but not a lamp!

posted by dewi on December 8th 2008 at 2:24pm
view dewi's profile

My god those are ugly! Gross.

posted by lyla on December 8th 2008 at 2:25pm
view lyla's profile

fug.

posted by TML on December 8th 2008 at 2:27pm
view TML's profile

What next - A Brass-plated Swarovski sofa?

posted by bepsf on December 8th 2008 at 2:31pm
view bepsf's profile

I'm afraid someone might sit on the floor lamps.

posted by whytephoenix on December 8th 2008 at 2:38pm
view whytephoenix's profile

I don't like them at all.

posted by iGeekChic on December 8th 2008 at 2:46pm
view iGeekChic's profile

Different is not necessarily bad. They're different. I just don't like them. Too 70s looking.

posted by Mr. Dangerous on December 8th 2008 at 2:48pm
view Mr. Dangerous's profile

Maybe these would look okay in context (and definitely not as a focal point!!), but it would take a really talented designer to make those look good.

posted by -haley- on December 8th 2008 at 2:59pm
view -haley-'s profile

Those pendant lamps are awesome!
The floor lamps would be better as a table.

posted by kiljoywashere on December 8th 2008 at 2:59pm
view kiljoywashere's profile

there is something very suffocating about them...

posted by Eleno_Mome on December 8th 2008 at 3:23pm
view Eleno_Mome's profile

I can't actually find a picture of one, but these remind me of an upholstered bar you might buy for a corner of your family room, really just a cheap little counter and two stools nobody would really ever sit at, not the cabinet where you'd store your liquor and glasses, not a room set aside in your house or even a devoted corner of your dining room. Cheesy and strange.

posted by K T G on December 8th 2008 at 3:26pm
view K T G's profile

even more No than the animal print paper lanterns.

posted by martha on December 8th 2008 at 4:06pm
view martha's profile

I agree w/ Haley -- it would take a talented interior designer to make these work. But they just live in a limbo between "attempted classy" and "humorous ironic". Erg and bleah.

posted by hambox on December 8th 2008 at 4:17pm
view hambox's profile

Where to vote?

In any case, a most definite not, not, NOT!

posted by Daily Nuance on December 8th 2008 at 4:40pm
view Daily Nuance's profile

I kind of want to punch the ceiling lights.

posted by ssssasha on December 8th 2008 at 4:49pm
view ssssasha's profile

Not my style... but I like the idea actually. Kind of flirty, funny play with the idea, almost as if they were winking at you. I would not take them seriously, but rather as a statement, one thing in the room kinda thing (I mean - not as addition to other similar style chairs or sofa).

posted by Offtza on December 8th 2008 at 5:51pm
view Offtza's profile

I'm alone in being able to imagine these working somewhere, I guess. I think they're kind of interesting. No, I don't know where exactly, but I think I like them at least a little more than I don't.

posted by Curtis on December 8th 2008 at 5:55pm
view Curtis's profile

I thought the ones with legs were table lamps, not floor lamps... whoops. Either way, I don't care for them.

posted by insanity_pepper on December 8th 2008 at 6:40pm
view insanity_pepper's profile

Maybe for Hugh Hegfner's pad.

posted by Lisa Hunter (Montreal) on December 8th 2008 at 7:14pm
view Lisa Hunter (Montreal)'s profile

Ugly!

posted by annavanna on December 8th 2008 at 8:30pm
view annavanna's profile

1) Hanging cord and legs are too thin - the design needs a more substantial support in keeping with the feeling of overstuffed opulence. And a big fat tassel hanging over one side.
2) These appear to be upholstered in acetate satin, which makes everything look cheap.

posted by amed studio on December 9th 2008 at 12:50am
view amed studio's profile

ChristopherB nailed it... "just so visually heavy for something that is suspended in the air."

Though I had the same initial thought as Ssssasha... a punching bag (albeit an overpriced one).

posted by TheGoodBiGirl on December 9th 2008 at 1:27am
view TheGoodBiGirl's profile

Just one more way for someone to capitalize on an overdone fad.
While I'm not a fan, I would love to see someone attempt to make this work in a room somewhere.

posted by Aiekan on December 9th 2008 at 11:38am
view Aiekan's profile

the lamps require a P(2) punch line

posted by JonathanB on December 9th 2008 at 1:33pm
view JonathanB's profile

fugly

posted by Fuzzyummy on December 12th 2008 at 7:00pm
view Fuzzyummy's profile

Feeds

RSS icon New York

+ City Feeds