apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Hot or Not? Massimiliano Adami's Fossili Moderni Table

11-10-08fossil2.jpg

We spotted these Fossili Moderni tables at Moss over the weekend, and fell in love with their brutal construction and simple materials. Part of a series designed by Massimiliano Adami, Fossili Moderni utilizes polyurethane foam to fill the space between found objects, creating unique, individual pieces (an aesthetic certainly reflected in the price of just under $5,000 per table)...

 
 

11-10-08fossil1.jpg

We think that if one were particularly taken with these, it wouldn't be all that difficult to construct at home. And as far as functionality is concerned (moss' website states "Do not expose the "Fossili Moderni" to direct sunlight (UV), water, or solvents"), perhaps a more durable, affordable option.

11-10-08fossil3.jpg

What do you think?

Tags

Hot or Not?, tables - dining & occasional, limited edition, Moss, Massimiliano Adami

Related Links

Share

Comments (43)

what the hell is that

posted by jmorey on November 10th 2008 at 8:03am
view jmorey's profile

What do I think? I think the staff at AT needs to hold a meeting to rethink the direction of their website if this is the sort of thing that's being 'fallen in love' with.

posted by peahen on November 10th 2008 at 8:03am
view peahen's profile

I'm cranky because AT never shows plain, crate-and-barrel modern design. I'm a troll.

Please, keep showing us new, innovative and thought-provoking design, despite trolls.

posted by amygdaloides on November 10th 2008 at 8:08am
view amygdaloides's profile

Hideous.

posted by C2 on November 10th 2008 at 8:08am
view C2's profile

if you've fallen in love with these, i've got a few pieces of old chewed gum which you might like for wall hooks for your landing strip.

posted by healthyhome on November 10th 2008 at 8:09am
view healthyhome's profile

I agree these are pretty bad. But the last piece, the section diorama, is interesting. I'm not sure I'd like to live with it...

posted by Comicgeek on November 10th 2008 at 8:21am
view Comicgeek's profile

I´m afraid my imagination is not big enough to see a table in this thing :-). I mean "Fossili moderni".

posted by jjanul on November 10th 2008 at 8:24am
view jjanul's profile

Note from Publisher:

We meet every day and drink coffee and talk about the direction of the website. We think that two rights, a left and then straight past the gas station is the direction we should go in.

I personally think those things are h i d e o u s but also provocative.

I personally find that I often have this feeling about stuff at Moss and so I think Moss is doing its job well. You can't not talk about Moss.

I professionally love Keehnan, and his take on things is different, unique and awesome.

I like a mix of voices and perspectives.

I like commenting.

posted by Maxwell on November 10th 2008 at 8:25am
view Maxwell's profile

i love MOSS but man these things are ugly & overpriced. ick.

posted by Kat1 on November 10th 2008 at 8:35am
view Kat1's profile

New...innovative...UGLY.

And I question how thought-provoking it is. Perhaps if the individual found objects could be seen or at least intuited, this would be an interesting comment on wastefulness blah blah blah. But as is, it's just WTF-provoking.

posted by Cassis on November 10th 2008 at 8:43am
view Cassis's profile

Aesthetically, they scare me. Fruit Nougat furniture.


https://missdels.com/products/soft-italian-fruit-nougat.html

posted by modernguy on November 10th 2008 at 8:50am
view modernguy's profile

With all the duct-tape, these could be appropriate in Dick Cheney's home.

posted by Usbek de Perse on November 10th 2008 at 8:53am
view Usbek de Perse's profile

The price is the punch line.

posted by sarahisaghost on November 10th 2008 at 8:53am
view sarahisaghost's profile

I think they're pretty cool looking, but a table which can't come in contact with water sounds terrible.

posted by Roethke on November 10th 2008 at 8:54am
view Roethke's profile

Hideous. In this case, found objects = garbage. Why would I want garbage encased in polyeurethane in my home?

posted by jooly on November 10th 2008 at 8:56am
view jooly's profile

these are hideous. but not quite as hideous as calling other posters in the community "trolls".

posted by amt230 on November 10th 2008 at 9:08am
view amt230's profile

Fruit nougat! Yes, modernguy, that's exactly what they look like. (Though I was thinking of the Brach's version that comes in little cubes.)

I wouldn't want one, but I'd kind of like to see them in person, if only so that I can touch them.

posted by insanity_pepper on November 10th 2008 at 9:28am
view insanity_pepper's profile

The only thing I can rationalize is that the designer got so wrapped up in his own creation that he couldn't see the fug for the trees. Or something like that. Pass!

posted by Erin in CR on November 10th 2008 at 9:28am
view Erin in CR's profile

I don't find this all too provocative - these tables are incredibly, ridiculously overpriced and completely impractical. I find it disturbing that outrageous work like this gets so much attention - there are so many artists and craftspeople out there who do beautiful work and don't get a wink of attention.

posted by ChristopherB on November 10th 2008 at 9:31am
view ChristopherB's profile

The tables are really beautiful when you see them in person. Photos just can't do them justice. Also they are custom made pieces so no two are alike hence the price. If you can't afford them don't buy them!

posted by goldtone on November 10th 2008 at 9:36am
view goldtone's profile

How larege are they? (They look huge.) Are they hollow? If they are, my cats could jump in and out. They love empty stuff.

These "tables" do make me appreciate my boring, square, 4 straight-legged, Danish modern teak end tables I've had since 1980. I can put baskets with catalogs and periodicals underneath them.

Their shape (round, sort of) is impractical in smaller quarters where multi-function & spacial considerations rule.

posted by stejeanne on November 10th 2008 at 9:46am
view stejeanne's profile

The 80s are baaaaack.

posted by Lisa Hunter (Montreal) on November 10th 2008 at 9:48am
view Lisa Hunter (Montreal)'s profile

Massimiliano Adami must be laughing his way to the bank.

posted by littlebrownbird on November 10th 2008 at 10:31am
view littlebrownbird's profile

$5000 for a table that you can't get wet is offensive. But by all means, DIY.

My two cents: I've always loved AT's all-things-considered attitude and enjoy many of the outlandish items that turn up here. It's been my impression that many of the Hot-or-Not posts are supposed to showcase items that the posters themselves think are in dubious taste to begin with. It's all very well to criticize an object (snarky though that can get), but slamming the posters is just below the belt. So an item's not to your taste... what on this site *is* to *everyone's* taste? I'd much rather stumble on an occasional piece of trash on this site than have the style gestapo editing it.

posted by whytephoenix on November 10th 2008 at 10:43am
view whytephoenix's profile

I think this looks like there was some sort of malfunction with some of the mass-production machinery one day, and they are trying to recoup by calling these one-of-a-kind and charging 3 arms and a leg. Just take your recycling to the recycler and ask if you can have your stuff back after it's only partially mangled and compacted; one-of-a-kind things aren't always works of art, they can be just ordinary but not able to come out the same way twice. There's a world of difference!

posted by K T G on November 10th 2008 at 11:02am
view K T G's profile

hey look, my recycling bin just took a dump.

posted by animalhouze on November 10th 2008 at 11:32am
view animalhouze's profile

oh dear, those things are expensive eyesores, but rather hilarious :-D i can imagine that it is fun making them. and if you have a house of, say, ten rooms or more, you can have a room with stuff like this and only inflict it on yourself when you feel strong enough :-P

i think they are not really meant as everyday use furniture.

go you, Maxwell, for backing your people up ...

posted by maike on November 10th 2008 at 11:34am
view maike's profile

Addressing amt230, I only want to ensure that provocative design isn't censored so that only 'tasteful' is posted--I'm asking that AT post stuff that not everyone agrees with, and specifically user peahen requested this stuff not be posted.

I want to be surprised and inspired here. I can find 'normal' in the catalogs in the mail, or HGTV.

posted by amygdaloides on November 10th 2008 at 11:49am
view amygdaloides's profile

fruit nougat!! funny
these pieces remind me of my time spent in art school. we would have our class critiques of each other's work, and the people with THE MOST BUTT-UGLY work would have the jargon and art-speak down cold. like the above butt-ugly pieces. functionally, they're also nearly useless. whatever happened to the bauhaus maxim: form follows function? this has neither. and that price tag? i don't even have words for that.

but i agree with maxwell: it's good to be provoked to thought, to comment, to dialogue. AT should continue to post these beasties right alongside the sublime; both kinds of posts are educational

posted by formosagirl on November 10th 2008 at 11:50am
view formosagirl's profile

btw: i just saw animalhouze's comment, and i'm still laughing

posted by formosagirl on November 10th 2008 at 11:51am
view formosagirl's profile

I have no problem with "hot or not" posts about expensive rubbish from Moss. But don't come crying when the "trolls" call a spade a spade.

posted by particlebored on November 10th 2008 at 12:08pm
view particlebored's profile

wow. Give you people something to look at that is a bit different from the normal AT posts of what you see in Pottery Barn or the pages of your beloved Dwell magazine and you all go postal. You all need to chill out.

posted by 1971MI on November 10th 2008 at 12:24pm
view 1971MI's profile

insanity_pepper: Moss being Moss, I'm afraid touching is out of the question.

posted by particlebored on November 10th 2008 at 12:41pm
view particlebored's profile

sorry- it's a not for me. I have a 6 year old Nephew that makes me school crafts that are much more attractive and clever. i'm serious, not being a sap.

posted by brickhouse on November 10th 2008 at 1:14pm
view brickhouse's profile

What a bunch of overpriced crapola.

posted by bepsf on November 10th 2008 at 1:33pm
view bepsf's profile

Well, it certainly performed art's true function . . . stimulating conversation. All things considered, I would personally prefer one of those prank companies churn me out a HUGE plastic dog pooh to use as a table and it would probably only be $29.95. Fact is much of the stuff that passes as art and high dollar fancy goods are junk no one else would consider but when an astronomical figure is attached to them they suddenly become . . . "self important" much like the people who sell and critique them.

posted by lscceo on November 10th 2008 at 1:44pm
view lscceo's profile

Who would buy a $5000 pile of plastic crap that's made to look like fruitcake?

posted by Stephie_is_a_dork on November 10th 2008 at 2:56pm
view Stephie_is_a_dork's profile

I wish I could vote "NOT" more than just once?

posted by quiltmaster on November 10th 2008 at 3:29pm
view quiltmaster's profile

This table that looks like vomit is just under $5,000? What is happening with AT? Where is the affordable, yet stylish items for small spaces? This does not seem to fit the mold...and it's not inspiring in the least.

posted by suzy8track on November 10th 2008 at 4:22pm
view suzy8track's profile

the method and the idea are pretty solid and I've seen MUCH better examples of poly foam being used for furniture. These are very poor examples.

posted by TheoJ on November 10th 2008 at 11:16pm
view TheoJ's profile

I wouldn't even have that in my home if someone paid me $5000.

posted by MsUnreliable on November 11th 2008 at 6:43am
view MsUnreliable's profile

A fool and his money....

posted by muirwoods08 on November 15th 2008 at 9:49pm
view muirwoods08's profile

johnjames - I absolutely agree with your point, what I was clearly taking issue with was your tone. I learned long ago that in order to make your point you should not reduce yourself to name calling.

posted by amt230 on November 19th 2008 at 2:09pm
view amt230's profile

Feeds

RSS icon New York

+ City Feeds