apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Hot or Not? Translucent Dining Chair Slipcovers

0617_covers.jpg

We've always liked the tidy tailored look that slipcovers can bring to old dining room chairs. But what about these? The covers are very lightweight, allowing you to see the decorative wood chair backs through the fabric...

 
 

We can't quite decide for ourselves. Part of us likes the ephemeral quality of the light, gauzy fabric used here. The other part of us prefers a heavier duck cloth that would cover the chairs completely and read more cleanly...

Image: John Umberger

Tags

Hot or Not?, diningroom, slipcovers

Related Links

Share

Comments (50)

I had a hard time deciding whether or not I like this, but eventually decided I do. They look almost ghostly though -- not breezy.

posted by hyacinthine on June 17th 2009 at 9:04am
view hyacinthine's profile

Oh I like them a lot. And I think they'd be especially pretty in metallic sheers, and sherbet colors.

posted by SunnyBlue on June 17th 2009 at 9:05am
view SunnyBlue's profile

This is missing the choice for those who are wondering why on earth you'd put a slip cover on a perfectly beautiful chair.

Unless a chair is pretty much ruined, I just don't get putting slipcovers on dining chairs. it always looks to me like the house has been closed up for a long absence. These slipcovers only enhance that dust cover look.

posted by bonjourmiette on June 17th 2009 at 9:08am
view bonjourmiette's profile

i can't answer this survey because i hate slipcovers for chairs. these are nice chairs, i think if a chair is ruined it should be repaired or replaced. This looks like a caterer at a wedding set this up. They need to be ironed as well.

That sounds nasty, but I just really don't like slipcovers for chairs. But for those that do, I would agree that the sheer looks better than the opaque so you can still see the design of the chair underneath.

posted by s2k on June 17th 2009 at 9:13am
view s2k's profile

The structure of the chair may be cool, but the finish of the chair may not be. So, I think the translucent slip cover is a good fix. It adds a certain depth too. I don't think it looks like a dust cover. I think it looks more intentional than that. I dig it.

posted by jef613 on June 17th 2009 at 9:13am
view jef613's profile

not a fan, but it's not horrible.

That art on the wall is really, really cool though. Looks like thin pieces of agate.

posted by ec05 on June 17th 2009 at 9:14am
view ec05's profile

very post modern, takes me back to the 1980s when i first saw this. still looks good in the right room.

posted by patrickmc on June 17th 2009 at 9:18am
view patrickmc's profile

i despise slipcovers!!

they just NEVER look good. no matter how translucent they are - unless, hmm, invisible??

posted by kdkaboom on June 17th 2009 at 9:22am
view kdkaboom's profile

I love the art behind the table. Can anyone tell me the artist, or is it pieces of glass hung together?

posted by kats09 on June 17th 2009 at 9:28am
view kats09's profile

I'm not a fan of this at all. I think it detracts from an otherwise lovely room.

posted by ecofriendlyconsumer on June 17th 2009 at 9:44am
view ecofriendlyconsumer's profile

Gorgeous room. The lightly slipcovered chairs just take it to a whole notha' level for me. I actually think the rumpled/wrinkly fabric makes it even better, too.

I *usually* hate slipcovered dining room chairs, but I seriously love this, and am bookmarking this page for my Future Dream Dining Room.

posted by EC on June 17th 2009 at 9:45am
view EC's profile

I have to say I'm not a fan of slipcovered chairs and the translucent quality of these makes me think of dustcovers like several other people have said. Maybe if the chairs were thrashed.

posted by Tiamat_the_Red on June 17th 2009 at 9:46am
view Tiamat_the_Red's profile

I think these are really ugly. Actually the whole room is a disaster, in my opinion.

posted by sally305 on June 17th 2009 at 9:46am
view sally305's profile

I do not understand slipcovers. It makes it obvious to everyone who sees them that you are hiding something.

posted by kiljoywashere on June 17th 2009 at 9:46am
view kiljoywashere's profile

not a fan of slipcovers but i love the ghostly look of these. they are especially striking against the bold artwork. nice contrast.

posted by cometz on June 17th 2009 at 9:46am
view cometz's profile

I'm typically not a fan of slipcovers and these do nothing to change my mind.

posted by sara mc on June 17th 2009 at 9:47am
view sara mc's profile

This is definitely one of those trendy decor things that we'll look back on in ten years and laugh about.

I'm at an age where I've tossed a lot of stuff that I once thought was very hip. I've acquired immunity, I guess. Stuff that is new and different just the sake of being new and different does nothing for me.

posted by spanky on June 17th 2009 at 9:52am
view spanky's profile

Very interesting, but on the fence as to whether I actually like it or not. But, I bet slipcovers with a silhouette of a fancy chair printed on them would be a hit - in the ironic-twist method of design. That way you could elevate cheap chairs, rather than hide nice ones.

posted by home body on June 17th 2009 at 9:55am
view home body's profile

Screw the covers, I want more info on the art installation!!

posted by mntwmyn on June 17th 2009 at 9:58am
view mntwmyn 's profile

Slip covers are normally used to keep furniture clean these don't add anything and seem unnecessary to me.

posted by hrhprincessfiona on June 17th 2009 at 10:00am
view hrhprincessfiona's profile

I think slipcovers on chairs are silly, but at least you can still see some chair with these... And I suppose it is a good easy way to change colors without painting potentially valuable wood chairs...

posted by lemonadefish on June 17th 2009 at 10:01am
view lemonadefish's profile

To get the effect right, more phantom, I'd imagine a sheer fabric could be used.

Otherwise, I'm on the slipcover-on-good-chairs hate train.

For that matter, tho I like the ideas, I've never seen satisfactory executions of fabric cover-overs (like for kitchen cabinets, doorway-nook covers, slips that go over real furniture. The sort of soft, craftsy look doesn't look like it ever belongs with the hard edges.

posted by neighborguy on June 17th 2009 at 10:17am
view neighborguy's profile

yes. i don't really know about the slip covers, but I LOVE the art work. any ideas to what this might be??

posted by nytenglee on June 17th 2009 at 10:18am
view nytenglee's profile

I'm guessing the artwork is panels of warm glass?

posted by Kate (NC) on June 17th 2009 at 10:33am
view Kate (NC)'s profile

I am with sally305--hideous room! And horrible art glass.
I do like the ghostliness of the slipcovers, though.
Finally you have, IMO, a hot-or-not that's not ridiculous,
like a sex chair or a lamp made out of beef.

posted by baba yaga on June 17th 2009 at 10:39am
view baba yaga's profile

I think this room would look a lot better without the slipcovers, but I could imagine a setting where they would work. Bedroom, candlelight, windows thrown open to the breeze, champagne and chocolate on a small round table flanked by two of these chairs. All of the participants in their beautiful lingerie, even the chairs!

posted by mrs yow on June 17th 2009 at 10:43am
view mrs yow's profile

They look like ghost chairs! They should be in the "Haunted Mansion" ride down at Disney World. Probably would work in a purposefully spooky setting, like if you were going for a full on Tim Burton-Beetlejuice look. But here they just look silly, particularly with that style of artwork on the wall.

posted by Annegret on June 17th 2009 at 10:44am
view Annegret's profile

I've always hated slipcovers for dining chairs because they look like one is covering up ugliness with cleaner, newer ugliness. I can see some situations that could require them such as one can't afford better chairs, or can't afford to have their chairs professionally redone (i.e. DIY is not their strength), but generally I say no to slipcovers.

However, seeing the chair peek through has made me lighten up a bit. To make this work I think the chair needs to have a good silhouette. Then the quality of the fabric and the level of translucency are important. It must be a natural fabric of high quality and it must be bordering on sheer.

But for what that is going to cost one, why not recover, refinish, or purchase?

posted by greyscale on June 17th 2009 at 10:46am
view greyscale's profile

"This is missing the choice for those who are wondering why on earth you'd put a slip cover on a perfectly beautiful chair."

My thoughts exactly.

Hating the "Art" installation too.

posted by bepsf on June 17th 2009 at 10:52am
view bepsf's profile

I like these, especially the ephemeral quality of the silhouette, which would be dependent on the angle of the light. I think they would be more effective in natural light. They do seem pretty scandalous, though. :)

posted by safarikate on June 17th 2009 at 11:01am
view safarikate's profile

There is the possibility that one might need slip covers in a household with small i.e messy kids, not to cover up stained ugliness, but to protect pristine prettiness.
That said, that is the ONLY excuse for slip covers, and these are a nice option.

Yes, not really getting the art, looks a little institutional to me.

posted by puddle on June 17th 2009 at 11:22am
view puddle's profile

For those interested, that art looks very like my friend r.r. lyon (similar if not his, which is often comprised of smaller but more numerous individual paintings on plexi):

www.lyonandlyonfineart.com/rrlyonll.html

posted by Elizabeth II on June 17th 2009 at 11:44am
view Elizabeth II's profile

Vicente Wolf has been using this type of sheer slipcover for years. I think it's quite beautiful.

posted by djfoakland on June 17th 2009 at 12:43pm
view djfoakland's profile

Thanks Elizabeth!

posted by kats09 on June 17th 2009 at 12:52pm
view kats09's profile

This room is designed by Atlanta-based designer Kathy Guyton. This is her personal dining room. The table and espelier (the iron tree to the left) are from PierceMartin.

I'll ask Kathy who the artist is and let you know when I find out.

posted by ryaninmidtown on June 17th 2009 at 12:54pm
view ryaninmidtown's profile

i think some of you might be missing the whole look. those chairs w/o the slip covers would have been way too traditional for that table base, take a closer look. this application tones that down and still gives you the wonderful lines showing through the linen gauze.

the art installation is glass! i've seen those before and they are beautifull up close or in person. too bad they appear as painted panels to some.

posted by m2in Atlanta on June 17th 2009 at 1:02pm
view m2in Atlanta's profile

Ambivalent about the chairs.

Love the art.

posted by SherryBinNH on June 17th 2009 at 1:53pm
view SherryBinNH's profile

Chair lingerie...sexy?

posted by judy in TO on June 17th 2009 at 2:52pm
view judy in TO's profile

ART = 10
Chairs = ghost skeletons. This is a BAD.

posted by brenton on June 17th 2009 at 4:14pm
view brenton's profile

I think this was a good effort and I tried to like them, but I just don't. To me, the slipcovers aren't working well in the room pictured. I think the room is neat, I love the contemporary art and the contemporary (?) glass table with traditional chairs and traditional wainscoting. I think these slipcovers over relatively ornate chairs adds visual noise without adding much appeal. I am not unilaterally opposed to slip covered dining chairs, I just don't think these work in this room.

posted by KWorld on June 17th 2009 at 4:51pm
view KWorld's profile

I like what is happening relative to mixing traditional and contemporary. The glass top table with pedestal base is contemporary (although the base is bothering me. What the hell is that?). That dining room with the wainscotting and crown moulding is traditional. The chairs are traditional and not particularly interesting on their own (certainly not alone with that table). The slipcover effect helps them transition in that space and appear "worthy" to be there. I do not care for the ties on the slipcovers; that looks country and is off. Like the idea of translucent metallic fabric and have seen this done and it works. The art installation is very, very cool. I want to explore the rest of the house and see what other kinds of art might be about. The centerpieces seems country. Glass vases on a glass tabletop? Good opportunity to add a new texture, color, vibe and connect these disparate themes of modern and traditional. Wouldn't a collection of large chinese vases be cool?

posted by ShellyinMSP on June 17th 2009 at 6:22pm
view ShellyinMSP's profile

It's great to have covers so that you don't have to dust that wood. I keep covers over my wrought iron patio furniture because it's too hard to keep them clean otherwise. Maybe these people wanted to keep the wood from getting dusty.

posted by dkzody on June 17th 2009 at 9:16pm
view dkzody's profile

"Finally you have, IMO, a hot-or-not that's not ridiculous,
like a sex chair or a lamp made out of beef."
____

Baba Yaga--too funny!

posted by sally305 on June 17th 2009 at 10:20pm
view sally305's profile

I enjoyed both the book and film Less Than Zero. I just don't want to live in it.

posted by Seaside on June 17th 2009 at 10:30pm
view Seaside's profile

Yeah, it's a trend-thing I suppose... I do like the eerie feel to it, but I'd take bare wood over cloth any day!

posted by dunklekatze on June 18th 2009 at 12:01am
view dunklekatze's profile

I think ther're beautful, and they soften the room.

posted by shinypenny on June 18th 2009 at 7:52am
view shinypenny's profile

Artwork is awesome. IMO, the slipcovers should cover only the back & seat, stopping at the bottom of the cushions, thus leaving the legs exposed; the "skirt" tends to ruin the effect for me. Funny, my first thought was the Haunted Mansion too.

posted by muirwoods08 on June 18th 2009 at 10:06am
view muirwoods08's profile

I have been contemplating such slips for a 50's set dining chairs. I have already desecrated the chairs with an outlandish paint job ala 'MacKenzie Childs' which I'm growing tired of. I think a black paint job with sheer slips would create a pleasing silhouette with natural light passing through.

posted by Alice on June 19th 2009 at 5:52pm
view Alice's profile

i can't believe there are so many slipcover haters here. i like using slipcovers to allow the furniture to sport different looks at a whim. it being a dustshield is incidental.

that said, slipcovers work better on pieces that are originally upholstered. in fact, if they are well-done, they won't even look like slipcovers. i'm not too keen on covering up wood, so i'm not exactly a fan of the slipcovers in this picture, whether they be sheer or opaque.

ditto on them looking like wedding reception setup.

posted by selenakyle on June 21st 2009 at 1:51pm
view selenakyle's profile

Ha - this reminds me of when my old company put sheer slipcovers over clear Louis Ghost chairs in our showroom. Pretty funny.

posted by apdesigngirl on June 22nd 2009 at 9:18pm
view apdesigngirl's profile

Feeds

RSS icon New York

+ City Feeds