apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


$300 Designer Makeovers
The New York Times 3.12.09

300-makeover-01.jpg"In These Economic Times" — we've heard it over and over, and this week, The New York Times challenged 5 interior designers to makeover the rooms of 5 people who have recently lost their jobs. The catch? Attempt the work on a budget of $300...

 
 

This feature from The New York Times is great inspiration for our readers to sign up for the Spring Cure — though there are lots of tips, tricks and ideas in the 5 examples, the major ideas to pull from this experiment are:

• declutter and clean

• fix what is broken

• rearrange and edit what you have

Check out the full story, The $300 Makeover (At Least That Was the Goal) and DON"T MISS the audio slideshow from author Julie Scelfo. It includes process photos and some great insight from the overall experience.

(Images: Michael Falco, James Estrin)

Tags

inspiration, The New York Times, budget

Related Links

Share

Comments (38)

i gotta say, this is a great article. now is a good time to shake up the energy in your every day life.

posted by Lady J on March 12th 2009 at 12:05pm
view Lady J's profile

I agree Lady J - and the Spring Cure (with the awesome new page and local discussion boards) is a great way to do the same kind of "shake up" in your own home.

posted by Aaron on March 12th 2009 at 12:10pm
view Aaron's profile

I read this article in the NY Times this morning and I was waiting for it to be posted here so that I could get this off my chest - that brown room with the huge white things on the wall is HORRIFIC! (Oh, and in the very last one, how does she watch TV since very single piece of furniture in her place seems to have it's back to it?)

posted by idontdobeige on March 12th 2009 at 12:14pm
view idontdobeige's profile

As much as I care about design, if I were out of work, it's the last thing I would spend $300 on. How about groceries? Utilities? Mortgage/rent?

posted by pvett on March 12th 2009 at 12:16pm
view pvett's profile

Is it weird that I liked the b4 better in first one? It was messy and needed to be clean, but the room seemed so much bigger and brighter; and I liked the pink & silver.

The third one is really nice. The lights make a huge difference. And it's a fun room.

pvett, hopefully the money didn't come from the room owners. Otherwise, yes, odd choice for the recently unemployed.

posted by TrueTex on March 12th 2009 at 12:22pm
view TrueTex's profile

a big part of the story was that these recently unemployed persons were spending much more time in their home and really wanted to make it work better for them while they were there...

posted by Aaron on March 12th 2009 at 12:29pm
view Aaron's profile

more specifically, each person said they were going crazy being in their homes all the time

posted by Lady J on March 12th 2009 at 12:39pm
view Lady J's profile

So most of the designers didn't even manage to stay under the $300 budget? I'm kinda disappointed in the results. The tight budget was an opportunity for these designers to get really innovative and creative and they kind of fell flat. I did like the third one - and it only cost $296!

posted by Tara77 on March 12th 2009 at 12:47pm
view Tara77's profile

Um, the decal/stenciling? Big nono.

posted by zaky on March 12th 2009 at 12:51pm
view zaky's profile

Kinda screams paintball practice to me. Sorry. Not my cup o' tea I guess.

posted by lemort1 on March 12th 2009 at 12:59pm
view lemort1's profile

I think they were sort of harsh in claiming only one designer stayed under $300. One came in at $304, and another at $326, which is close enough for me.

I loved this article. I always wonder what a designer would do without $500 vases and 12 foot ceilings.

posted by Cheryl on March 12th 2009 at 1:14pm
view Cheryl's profile

The faux rug in pic 5 is awesome.
The white wall decals are heinous, but at least they can be removed quickly.

posted by kiljoywashere on March 12th 2009 at 1:31pm
view kiljoywashere's profile

in pix 9 - 10, the tv was moved to sit on a credenza behind the couch and chairs. i know its more chic looking to have a sitting area w/ out a tv but how realistic is that? maybe they wanted it out of the way so they wouldnt watch tv all day

posted by tabithacat on March 12th 2009 at 1:34pm
view tabithacat's profile

I loved this article (though couldn't stand the big white stencil pattern, or the stripped walls). And yes, $300 is a lot to spend for someone who is unemployed. But, environment breeds mood, and when someone is home all day trying to get work, an organized, inspiring space is REALLY important. More than anything I enjoyed the fact that most people just needed to get organized, clean, and reconsider furniture placement and use—all FREE ideas.

posted by jesschamberlain on March 12th 2009 at 1:47pm
view jesschamberlain's profile

See this is the kind of thing I would like to see more of on AT intstead of expensive over designed art-fart kind of furniture. We (sorry I) want more design ideas and on a budget.

posted by Joan52 on March 12th 2009 at 2:24pm
view Joan52's profile

Hi guys - that's my apartment in pix 9-10, and I wanted to explain the TV thing - I hate having the TV as the centerpiece of the seating area - I like it to be more a "conversation" area so have always tried to minimize its presence. In this case, the TV is now in the perfect spot -- it can be angled to face the couch (which I have def. been doing), and I can now watch TV in bed, which I love doing! That make sense?

posted by laurarich on March 12th 2009 at 2:26pm
view laurarich's profile

well, it does say studio so i figured the tv must face the unseen bed. i like how your new arrangement focuses on the view out the window.

what's harsh about saying people didn't stick to the rules? the limit was $300. even if they came close, they did not meet the criteria. it's important for them, as journalists and as judges, to disclose who did/did not follow the rules.

posted by Lady J on March 12th 2009 at 3:21pm
view Lady J's profile

joan52, weren't you looking for nightstands that size that concealed everything? (pictured bedroom with pink bedding)

posted by Lady J on March 12th 2009 at 3:23pm
view Lady J's profile

I liked two of the places, Laura Rich's apartment and Aurora Pedraza home, but the others didn't do it for me at all. The white stenciling on the brown walls were just so very ugly, and didn't like the color graphic on the apartment wall. It looked very teenage to me (although the article did say that the tenant lived as though he was still an adolescent). I hated the way the bedroom looked; mostly didn't like the colors or design, but the metal bed has those ugly black rubber risers on the legs (presumably to store stuff under the bed) that look like the bed legs are wearing orthopedic shoes. Major clash with the supposedly sexy new bedcovers.

posted by Sydney on March 12th 2009 at 3:36pm
view Sydney's profile

the problem with the stencil is color. the colors are too dull and the contrast ratio isn't right. maybe if they were a dark spicey color instead of light. the pattern itself is gorgeous, but there are too many of them and they're too close together given their size.

posted by Lady J on March 12th 2009 at 4:04pm
view Lady J's profile

I'm with everyone else who thinks that stencil job is heinous.

posted by anmar on March 12th 2009 at 4:19pm
view anmar's profile

Ok, so before = crappy picture, with bad lighting and junk everywhere. After = nice lighting, carefully chosen perspective and freshly cleaned. I'm only moderately impressed.

posted by particlebored on March 12th 2009 at 4:28pm
view particlebored's profile

I like laurarich's apartment (9 & 10) and think it is a great representation of what you can do with a modest amount of money and a furniture rearrangement. Now the room isn't focused around the TV, the color is brighter and tied together with the rug/curtains and the desk chair can be turned around to join the party.

posted by katszeye on March 12th 2009 at 5:09pm
view katszeye's profile

Huh... I really appreciate the article, even if I'm not wild about some of the makeovers.

Those decals. Oy.

posted by rosenatti on March 12th 2009 at 11:21pm
view rosenatti's profile

Okay, now I read that what I thought were decals are in fact stencils painted by a pro at a cost of $250.

There are no words.

posted by rosenatti on March 12th 2009 at 11:26pm
view rosenatti's profile

I think Laura Rich's is my favorite. I really like the drapes and the rug as they seem to brighten up the room. Does anyone know where they are from?

posted by shalchal on March 13th 2009 at 12:24am
view shalchal's profile

Not me Lady J. Another Joan perhaps?

posted by Joan52 on March 13th 2009 at 11:29am
view Joan52's profile

The first makeover came in at $490. What? So designer just decided to disregard the concept of the article, and go that much over the budget? She gets an F.

posted by gryt on March 13th 2009 at 1:16pm
view gryt's profile

Me, I'm dying to know what those designers would have charged for their labor if this weren't a "challenge".

posted by SherryBinNH on March 13th 2009 at 1:32pm
view SherryBinNH's profile

Well, I thought the most dramatic changes were in the Murray Hill and the Williamsburg apts. Adding splotches of dramatic color is what appealed to me.

Having said that, I was also impressed with the phonograph records storage solution already in place in Williamsburg apt. I have been looking for something just like this for my LP collection (of similar size) for the longest. Can anyone identify the source of this bookcase/bookshelf or for something similar?

posted by JD2002 on March 15th 2009 at 1:28am
view JD2002's profile

Some interesting ideas... I like how those strange brown-and-orange pillows kinda work with both the fushia bed and the brick red couch.

I did roll my eyes a bit when I read that the fifth designer, who went over-budget with $326, spent $54 on "bookshelf installation by handyman." Seriously, why?? Those don't really look that hard to install... I bet they even came with instructions.

posted by Emika on March 15th 2009 at 7:04am
view Emika's profile

I think this is the best "outside article" I've read on AT so far.

posted by tulpoeid on March 15th 2009 at 8:27am
view tulpoeid's profile

Ditto, on the(yuk) splats on walls. I always hated it when they went over the budget on HGTV shows, too. I mean isn't that the whole point? Set a budget , then stick to it.

posted by citygirlincountry on March 15th 2009 at 5:06pm
view citygirlincountry's profile

I like #1. I sympathize with the rubber risers, as function is paramount for some, but they do look a bit like orthopedic shoes (had to laugh at that). As I recall, Bed Bath & Beyond has some risers that are wood or wood look blocks. Perhaps that would be better. I like #9 the best, though it needs something large for the left wall. Any tips on finding a credenza like that for myself?

posted by BlueLM on March 18th 2009 at 8:25am
view BlueLM's profile

Ha ha! Love that unwatchable tv! LOL.
Some rooms a can't see what actually changed ( hmm, maybe a clean up and then duck out for a free $300 slap up meal / massage and hair cut : probably better choices for depressed people who have lost their jobs!).

I agree that those white Moroccan inspired (? has the designer been there ever LOL) blobs are depression inspiring.
But hey overall, doesn't this say you CAN make your place fresh without rushing out and spending a fortune and that a little change can help set you in the right direction. Overall a bloody good excercise! Bravo

posted by Lynda on March 18th 2009 at 5:31pm
view Lynda's profile

my neighbor brought this article over and dropped it off (because she's seen me painstakingly redo my apartment while refusing to buy any piece of furniture for more than $100. i love you, craigslist...)

i was mostly underwhelmed with the designers' choices, but i LOVE that peacock lampshade! i've been trying to figure out what i wanted to do in terms of a tall standing lamp in my bedroom; i knew i wanted a big round shade but i don't want it to be nondescript. and now i know!

posted by curvatura on March 18th 2009 at 10:24pm
view curvatura's profile

I'm sorry but I just can't take that "let's paint a supergraphic on the walls" solution again (Williamsburg apt)...it never looks good unless you have very, very good taste. Or unless you're Knoll (somewhere on this site is a wonderful orange wall with white periods and commas)...

posted by jennywren03 on March 19th 2009 at 9:38am
view jennywren03's profile

Here is the wall: I found it.

http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/ny/wallpaper-graphics/pause-graphic-wallcovering-by-2x4-079496

posted by jennywren03 on March 19th 2009 at 9:40am
view jennywren03's profile

Feeds

RSS icon New York

+ City Feeds