We've sung the praises of artist Ann Wood before. She is now creating custom paintings of roaring fires, which are sized to fit in any ornamental fireplace, and offered through Partners and Spade. We actually think this is a cool idea, and wish we could afford the Ann Wood original, but the starting price of $1,500 is prohibitive for us (recession or no recession). So we're filing this away as a great DIY project.
We spotted Ann's fireplace on The Moment where most people didn't like this idea at all, so we wanted to see what you think. Survey after the jump.






I think I'd hang it inside the firebox, however, instead of flush with the wall.
view Joan A.'s profile
N-O !
I prefer candles or branches options...
view Marie-Eve's profile
Ditto on Marie-Eve's comment. Lots of candles of different heights/sizes are so elegant...
view TheGoodBiGirl's profile
I. . . kind of hate everything in that picture.
view kiljoywashere's profile
corny
view icedesign's profile
Nah. Maybe if it were a different style--this one's a bit "Starving Artist" for my taste.
view rockypondgirl's profile
DIY only if you can paint. A good rule of thumb is that if a bunch of people hate it on one site, it's not going to fly over here. Also, I expect to see this in another city's Slinks by the week's end. Please head that off if you can.
view K T G's profile
for $1500 you could buy one of those amish engineering marvel thingers! and probably still cover your new electric bill
I think its a cool idea, if it were set back in a real fireplace it would probably be hard to see without a small spotlight or something on it.
it kind of reminds me of those tapes you can buy to put in your TV that shows a fire burning
view adamwa's profile
Cheesey
view Trii's profile
Somebody at AT should cover Partners and Spade, which I think is opening this week. Last week, a friend and I walked by there one evening, and were struck by a window full of live finches, and lots of interesting objects on display inside. A guy saw us peering through the window, came to the door and asked if he could help us. We asked if it was a store or a gallery, and said "A little of both" and invited us inside. It turned out to be Andy Spade himself, who gave us a private tour of the whole place. It's an interesting assortment of objects collected and curated by his friends and acquaintances which speaks to the nature of collecting, and how we look at "things" out side of their everyday existence. He was a really lovely guy, and it was a rare NYC treat.
view kimdog's profile
I think this is sort of hysterical. I would do it, but I wouldn't use this particular execution. I think the arrangement above does not work b/c it looks like the whole mantle, fireplace, and painting end 6 inches above the floor. It's like a whole fake shebang rather than a fake fire in a real fireplace.
view frum's profile
Um, faux anything is just a bad idea...
view bepsf's profile
Totally cheesy.
view jooly's profile
Why not put an LCD monitor with a video of a fire?
What?
a bad idea?
please leave?
view Daniel Poitiers's profile
Either my eyes are playing tricks on me, or the whole faux sha-bang is floating? I think it would work a bit better if it were (literally) grounded.
view julieleanne's profile
If you go to the link about the store offering the fireplace painting. It states that Ann's work is custom made. She wants the clients input on color and details. That makes each work unique in size, setting and color. It's worth it!
view Doris loves art!'s profile
I think the joke would wear thin. But if there were hidden depths to the painting -- devils and demons hiding among the flames perhaps -- it might work.
Best solution I've seen for a non-working fireplace was one where the entire brick thing (with a classic, painted mantel) was painted creamy white (including the inside) and the firebox was wired for downlights. So the fireplace became a lighted niche for featuring sculpture, flowers, branches, or anything seasonal. It looked great.
view Forestdweller's profile
I think there's supposed to be a hearth. I don't think the mantel is part of the effect, you just get the painting and use your own defunct fireplace.
I looked at the rest of her "art" and egads. EGADS. This is like the "starving artist" paintings at best.
view K T G's profile
that is ugly.
view mymurray's profile
Actually, now that I think about it, it would be cooler if it didn't attempt to be realistic. A funky fire would be better. With, as Forestdweller says, hidden depths.
view Joan A.'s profile
that looks very corny but i kinda like the idea. I would paint the fire popart-ish and make it look more graphic/simplified rather than realistic. funky bright colors and more simple, geometric,symmetrically shaped fire will definitely be fun!
view Fuzzyummy's profile
I agree that this faux fireplace is a little much. However, I actually have my own faux fireplace in my apartment: http://photos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-snc1/v2105/102/66/25102394/n25102394_33776026_7385.jpg
view ChellyT's profile
Creative, but not my thing. Especially once summer hits. A black hole would be better.
view NewHavenZ's profile
I'm kind of meh on it. Might as well slap in a TV set with one of those fireplace DVDs 24/7. At least that moves.
I'd be more of a fan of candles or some interesting sculptures in a non-working fireplace.
view SputnikSpak's profile
I agree that if the painting wasn't realistic it could work and be pretty cool. I just hate non-working fireplaces - such a waste! Granted, we can only use ours a few days out of the year, but it's worth it.
view redheadedblonde's profile
I think it's sort of amusing -- maybe not $1500 worth of fun, but definitely amusing.
Plus, it has always bugged me when (budget conscious) TV design shows decide to import a mantle as a faux fireplace, but leave the room wall color behind it. Mantles are not sufficiently interesting as sculpture to just prop one up and think of it as a focal point. If you can't create the illusion of a working fireplace, even if tongue in cheek like this, then just use a console table.
view SherryBinNH's profile
NO... SIMPLY NO
view wampler's profile
Maybe if the fire was done in some sort of cubist style but even then I think I'd have to turn it down
I really don't like any of it
view michael mendoza's profile
I think the idea's as good as the painting is good (the one shown is pleasant, but not the greatest, IMHO). I think any adhering "faux" stigma could be eliminated by putting a framed painting of a fire there instead---that might even be a little witty. . . .
view Aulaire's profile
Making one of those fake fires with a fan underneath red and yellow tissue paper to make it "crackle and dance" would be better than this
view mistuh_T's profile
I don't like the fire painting, but I do like the idea of a canvas painting in the firebox. Need this for my bedroom renovation!
view madampince's profile