apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Tiny Living: A Small House Movement Roundup
The New York Times 9.11.08

9-11-tiny-house-1.jpg

A steadily increasing number of people are choosing to live smaller — The New York Times rounds up some recent converts to the small house movement and talks to small-house developers who have seen growing interest in their tiny designs...

 
 

Why is the Small House Movement gaining steam? They cost less to purchase, maintain, heat and you can spend money on higher-quality materials. This feature is a great overview for the Small House Movement and there are lots of pictures included in the story, The Next Little Thing? and the audio slideshow.

Pics: Karie Hamilton

For additional tiny houses, check out these ATNY posts:
Studiomama's Tiny Beach Retreat
The Tiny House Near Gramercy Park
Green Campus Housing: Elizabeth Turnbal's Tiny Home

Tags

real estate, country house, small scale, prefab, tiny house

Related Links

Share

Comments (5)

the house above is 90 square feet? nup. couldn't do it.

my place is 400 square feet and i have enough angst trying to store and decorate. i'm so used to this amount of footage, i think i'd have a hard time getting used to anything smaller.

posted by *heather leaf* on 2008-09-11 12:09:47
view *heather leaf*'s profile

I like/understand the idea, and I try hard to keep my possessions under control. I believe in the freedom of this represents yet I find it hard to live this way. It's definately a process.

posted by DDgal on 2008-09-11 12:42:42
view DDgal's profile

It's interesting... I'm intrigued by the folks who actually LIVE in these homes. It's a huge life change that can be freeing (I'm living in 380 sqft, and never been happier with a place). But many of these people including they guy building his own from scratch are using them as offices or retreats. That's hardly revolutionary. It's just another toy to them.

posted by kimdog on 2008-09-11 13:40:13
view kimdog's profile

I liked a lot of the houses in this story, but I have to note that probably hundreds of thousands of people in the U.S. already live in tiny houses . . . they're called trailers. At least one of the houses in the story is a sexed-up trailer, too (you can see the license plate) in the picture. Doesn't sound as revolutionary if you call it that.

posted by Jenny in DC on 2008-09-11 18:11:37
view Jenny in DC's profile

Our family built our own tiny cottage two years ago. It is about twice the size of the one in the photo you have above but only about 1/5th the price. We've spent less than $7,000 to build it.

Beyond the usual advantages of tiny living such as less housework, lower taxes, less stuff, etc our house is made of stone, concrete and brick. This reduces the fire risk and got us a better homeowners insurance rate. Additionally the house's high thermal mass (100,000 lbs) makes it super easy to keep warm in the winter. It soaks up enough passive solar energy to keep well above freezing even in our frigid Vermont winters. We burned 3/4 of a cord of hardwood last year to cook and warm the cottage up to a very comfortable level. The stone construction also means less (almost no) maintenance.

The biggest reason we built small was because it was doable. We had a month or two before winter was going to set in. With two adults, a 14 year old, a 9 year old and a 3 year old anything more would have been too much since we were doing it all ourselves. As it was, it took us a solid two months of intensive work to close in the tiny cottage. Two years later we're very happy with it. The one thing we miss is more space for books. Someday we'll build a library. :)

posted by Walter Jeffries on 2008-09-14 20:31:25
view Walter Jeffries's profile