
The article points out what some of the developments are doing, including offering water efficient plumbing and low-flow irrigation as standards, options for adding bamboo flooring, rooftop solar panels, using recycled lumber in construction, and tankless heaters. Also many of these cities are giving builders incentives for green builders, such as reduced building permit fees and expedited plan checks.
Obviously there's a long way to go. The article states that "Depending on the scope of the green components, such homes can cost between 1 and 3 percent more,... but the increased life-cycle savings far outweigh the initial costs." I was encouraged to know that the city I live in, Irvine, has made a commitment to making all future communities green, and the article points out some of the steps this city has implemented already, including native plant landscaping to state of the art water conserving sprinkler systems. I'm really curious about several of the new developments that the article mentions and hope to check them out in person for a better report. Hopefully more cities as well as consumers will continue the demand for green building. Read the rest of the article here.
Images by Jebb Harris for OC Register
Comments (1)
I don't care what the buildings, site plans, landscaping, utility bills look like. A 3,100 square foot house is not green, unless there's 10 people living in it. Sure, a huge house in the 'burbs built of recycled materials is less un-green than one of all virgin materials, but seriously. SPRAWL IS NOT GREEN.