I'm sorry... but if someone is going to come and photograph you for a newspaper story, couldn't you at least put on a bra for the occasion? I mean, for chrissakes, she looks like a melted candle!

Snarky comments about the decor are fine, about the people and their bodies/choice of undergarments, not so much. Plus, I think she looks great - friendly and non-pretentious.

I think she looks amazing. And why on earth should bras be mandatory? Where is a woman's freedom to do whatever she wants? She's happy, from the article she seems to have a very rich and interesting life and she has a nice home... let her do whatever she wants!

i don't think hejira was being snarky. that was a comment was quite direct. and the bralessness is striking. i don't know that foundation garments are mandatory, but appropriateness is a factor.

it's her house, not an office, so whatever. but i only clicked through the jump because of it.

I was more turned off by the out-of-focus photo.

Interesting story but the interior leaves me flat. Bra or no bra:-)

http://www.MyDesignSecrets.com

I'm sure Mr. Man in the photo loves his wife's carefree spirit, as evidenced in his happy body language.

I love that they kept this home as a loft. It's a beautiful way to live. Not sure about that guest room though but that's ok. They don't have to sleep in it.

It's the Philadelphia Inquirer, not Enquirer.

Pretty cool that an older couple chose to go with a modern loft.

As for the comments of bras and camera focus, isn't this site supposed to be about design?

Yes, this site is about design, but I agree with Lady J that the bralessness distracts from the home, which is what the post (and PI article) are about.

LOL! Did anyone ever hear about Fubar? Everyone here is starting to remind me of tha site. Almost everyone.