Edison bulbs, aka filament bulbs, are those antique-looking light bulbs that you can look at directly without hurting your eyes. They are therefore often used bare, and they typically add a rustic or vintage accent to a room. Let's find out how they are different from regular, modern incandescent bulbs, and see if we find any surprising facts about the Wizard of Menlo Park himself, Thomas Edison, and his role in the invention of electric light bulbs. (Spoiler alert: we find something, and it's kind of surprising)!
Joseph Swan's (1878, left) and Thomas Edison's (1879, right) incandescent bulbs used nearly identical technology, but with different results
So here's the surprise (I'm not one for suspense): though we all accept that he was the 'inventor' of the light bulb, by the time Edison began his experiments with light bulbs, the general structure and technology for incandescent bulbs was already in place: a glass bulb evacuated of oxygen housing a filament of carbonized material that would glow but not burn when electrified. The crucial developments that laid the groundwork for Edison's success were achieved by more than a dozen scientists throughout the 19th century, most prominently by a British scientist named Joseph Swan, whose earlier published research was similar enough to Edison's prototype that he eventually won a court victory in Britain granting him partnership in Edison's UK business, very much against Edison's will.
Thomas Alva Edison in his laboratory
To Edison's credit, while he was a canny self-promoter, he also coined the phrase, "genius is 1% inspiration and 99% perspiration," which is an accurate and fair description of how he succeeded. He may have relied in part on the inspiration of his peers and predecessors — after all, many inventors and developers do — but he set himself apart with tireless research and experimentation. Joseph Swan's bulb had all the necessary components to function, but it didn't last very long. Edison determined that the key to creating a commercially viable bulb was finding the right material for the filament, one that would last for a long time before burning out. He contacted biologists for help in his search, and by his own count, he ultimately tested the carbonized filaments of more than 6,000 plant species in his search for a long-burning material. He finally settled on bamboo, and in 1880 he created a 16-watt bulb that could burn for over 1200 hours, finally a technology superior to the gas lamp and marketable to the general public.
Edison was embroiled in litigation and other vagaries of competition for the next couple of decades, but the incandescent bulb was already a massive success, especially as other scientists continued to improve on the technology, developing tungsten filaments that burned even longer than the bamboo and that didn't blacken the inside of the bulb.
Victorian Bulb available at Rejuvenation Hardware, $14
Other than these refinements, though, the incandescent bulbs we use today are essentially identical to those developed by Edison in 1880. Reproduction "Edison" bulbs look different because instead of double-wrapping six feet of tungsten filament into a tight coil, they have the filament stretched out and visible, formed into scribbly lines or primitive shapes. Some of them even use old-fashioned carbon filaments instead of tungsten. They also typically have vintage-inspired bulb shapes, like the above reproduction from Rejuvenation that features a hand-blown look reminiscent of Edison's own prototypes (Edison had a glass-blowing studio in his laboratory where glassmakers churned out bulb after bulb for his constant experiments.)
In the last twenty years, the reproductions have gotten popular especially in restaurant design, perhaps illustrating a parallel between the simple, rustic, vintage feel of the bulbs and the slow food/farm-to-table emphasis of American cuisine. There have even been several articles about how the Edison bulb is "played out" in restaurant design, including one in the New York Times last year.
Craft restaurant, NYC, designed in 2001 by Bentel & Bentel
While the technology has been basically unchanged for 130 years, that's about to change. Incandescent lights — not just Edison bulbs — are notoriously inefficient: they put out approximately 90% of the power they consume as heat, not light. As a result, the US government and governments around the world are phasing them out in favor of CFLs (compact fluorescent lamps) which are much more energy- and cost-efficient. Ikea has also declared that it will no longer sell incandescent light bulbs.
Plumen 001 bulbs
It's interesting to see such a direct conflict between our desire for green technology and cost-efficiency and our aesthetic tastes, which clearly favor the kind of light given off by incandescent bulbs. Hopefully designers and engineers will continue to perfect the existing CFL technology to bridge that gap. So far my favorite 'compromise' example is the Plumen bulbs (above), whose exposed coils bring the rustic charm of Edison's invention into the 21st century.
Images: Hannes Grobe via Wikimedia Commons; Swan's and Edison's prototypes via the Science Museum, London; Library of Congress print via incwell.com; Rejuvenation; The NYC restaurant Craft, designed in 2001, photo by Joshua Bright for the New York Times; Plumen
Related Apartment Therapy Posts:
Originally published 6.28.11 - JL

Z2 iPod Dock and Wi...
This was a very interesting read -- thanks!
Thanks for this very informative post! I really love the look and light of Edison bulbs but wish they were a bit more environmentally friendly ... here's to hoping that will change one day!
One note--it's not that incandescent bulbs are being phased out. It's bulbs that don't meet a certain efficiency standard, which includes incandescent bulbs.
If someone could invent a more efficient incandescent bulb, it would meet the new standards and be marketable.
I'm looking to LED lights to fill the gap, as the light from the CFL bulbs just doesn't look right to me.
Yeah, I don't like the light from CFLs either.
If the concern that incandescent bulbs waste energy by producing heat is an issue I think it's all relative. Typically we have lights on more in the winter months when the days are shorter. This is also when we heat our houses. The small amount of heat previously generated by incandescents will be compensated for by turning the furnace up a bit.
L-O-V-E edison bulbs... in fact, they were the inspiration behind my company name and logo (www.1879media.com). I just can't get enough of them.
oh, and just to clarify, 1879 is the year edison invented the light bulb (hence, the name). anyway, LOVE em!
t3d - agreed. In my world (Minnesota), incandescents are 100% efficient for about 8 months of the year.
I too LOVE Edison Bulbs and they are VERY hard to find. THANK you for the link to www.rejuvenation.com I ordered plenty as well as have a wish list of other items from them. Thanks for sharing!
Just read about a new LED light bulb. It looks like an incandescent bulb of the future. http://www.slate.com/id/2298444/
The thing is, you can get CF's that are color balanced to look like incandescent. Home Depot has a line that comes in three color temperatures (incandescent, white light and daylight (a slight blue tinge)). They're indistinguishable from incandescents and I have them all over my house. They're not noticeably more expensive than "regular" CF's.
Take a look, or do a quick google search and you'll find CF's and LED bulbs in a variety of color temps.
Chalk me up as another vote for the "CFL light is ugly" camp. This goes for the "daylight" and "incandescent" balanced CFLs too.
Additionally, I've never found that CFLs last remotely as long as the manufacturers claim. I've had incandescent bulbs last 10,000 hours, but never a CFL.
Given that CFL manufacture takes a lot of polluting heavy metals (mercury and cadmium, anyone?) I don't actually think that they're any more "green" than incandescents.
Incandescent bulbs are a better deal all around (they give good light, last longer, and are green), so I'll continue using them until meddling bureaucrats prevent me from doing so.
If you'd like to learn about other things that Edison DIDN'T invent go here: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/tesla
We favor the light from incandescent lamps because we are used to it. I prefer sunlight myself.
Fluorescents have been able to reproduce the light from incandescents for a while now, as well as a range of other qualities, including daylight. I bet if people were asked to state their preference based purely on the light in a room, without knowing the source of the light, they would not "prefer" incandescents.
Your experience does not match scientific studies.
CFLs need to be used properly. Incandescents are less fussy. E.g., most CFLs need to be used in an upright position. Fluorescents in general have come a long way and there's a wide range of light quality to choose from.
CFL manufacturer does NOT use "a lot of polluting heavy metals." They use trace amounts that are easily handled by proper disposal. When you're wasting 90% of electricity in incandescent bulbs, that is true waste.
It's clear that incandescents are not more green or last longer than fluorescents. As for light, I really think that if you didn't know where the light came from, and judged solely on the basis of the light you experience, you wouldn't have a preference for incandescents.
Yes! It irks me that these would be called Edison bulbs.
I prefer incandescent bulbs. Fluorescents make everyone look green. Those curly bulbs are like old-school televisions where you have to count to three for them to turn on after you flip the switch. This is progress? Whatever.
YES. THIS. Thomas Edison was an awful person. Here is another hilarious account, featuring John C. Reilly:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gOR91oentQ
Perhaps I'm more sensitive to color, but I switched all my incandescent floodlights in my artist studio to cfl (incandescent color balanced ones) and the difference is very noticeable. I don't care what the cfl package says about balance and color temp--my eyes see a difference.
YES!!! Thank you! Tessla > Edison!!!
So why do all the packages say to open the windows and leave the room if you break a CFL bulb? I don't think that anyone needs those kind of toxins in their house. Certainly not in the name of being "green."
With all due respect, I have been Edison's home in FL and the light bulbs he created are STILL burning. No replacements. Ever.
Shameless plug...
I have similar lighting via ETSY - http://www.etsy.com/shop/LongMadeCo