We're inspired by his ideas and tone, gently reminding us that we don't need an eco-vacation to Bali to connect with the earth, because the same connection can be made in much more simple ways. And he suggests several good questions for when we are contemplating whether something deserves to be called green:
• Is it necessary? (Does it aid in our lives?)
• What are its component materials, and what is their production’s impact to the environment? (Sure it is a natural material, but is it assembled by quasi-slave labor?)
• How long will it last?
Simple? Yes. But as you go about making a green home for yourself in a no-so-green world, it's important to remember the basics.
As for Houshmand's furniture (shown above): we're also smitten.
We'd like to know which questions resonate with you, so, please, comment away.
Thanks to AT:Green Home reader Vanessa for the tip.
A Contemporary Space in the Queen City 
Ten Tips for The Sexiest Bedroom... Like Ever (And also for finding love) 
Good Food to Share 
The Big Book of Small, Cool Spaces 
Apartment Therapy Presents 
The Eight-Step Home Cure 
Geneva Sound System...
How To Cook a Steak: 15 Recipes for a Weeknight Valentine's Meal
How To Make Cake Pops
Comments (5)
Ah, but that first question -- "is it necessary?" -- is deceptive in its simplicity.
What's truly necessary beyond basic shelter and safety? I can make a case for why I want a great many things, and my wants are certainly fewer than those of your basic McMansion dweller, but that's a long way from needing those things.
There are days when my home amuses me and supports my lifestyle, and there are days when I can really see the appeal of going for stark minimalism in 200 sq ft. "Necessary" is a tough call.
"Is it necessary?" I think that this should be on my walls to remind me daily, hour by hour....
John's SPECTACULAR furniture is available to the trade here in New York at DESIGNLUSH in the NYDC. He is also a SERIOUSLY nice guy.
John's questions beyond "is it necessary?" are horrible. People consistently demonstrate that reasoning about environmental issues is hard. Folk impact assessments usually come up with the exact opposite of the correct costs.
Some examples off the top of my head: dishwashers are more efficient than handwashing, disposable cups have a lower impact than ceramic, horses are cleaner than cars, etc.
Why are those questions "horrible"?