apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Abbey Hendrickson's Art Display

5-5-art display.jpgWhile we found quite a few things to ogle in Abbey Hendrickson's House Tour over at Cookie's blog, it was this art display that really grabbed our attention. Hanging artwork in clusters isn't new to us, but it's not every day you see it hung so high on the wall...

Abbey says that she got the idea from Bay Area artist Barry McGee.

See the House Tour here.

Via: Cup of Jo

Related Posts:
Hanging Art
Displaying Artwork
How To: Hang Artwork in Clusters

Tags

art display, displaying art

Share

Comments (26)

Well, shut my mouth. I'm always telling people their art's hung too high, but this looks really great.

posted by JV on 2008-05-05 20:03:56
view JV's profile

Love it

posted by hdtex on 2008-05-05 20:04:03
view hdtex's profile

It does make the ceilings look high (whether they actually are is hard to tell). Not sure I like the look, tho.

posted by Fivebyfive on 2008-05-05 20:55:18
view Fivebyfive's profile

over it.

posted by gorillaglam on 2008-05-05 21:45:40
view gorillaglam's profile

Artist Barry "Twist" McGee does an art installation of untitled drawings very much like this--check it out:

http://www.pbs.org/art21/artists/mcgee/card1.html

I like it because it looks like it could keep growing as needed...

posted by R on 2008-05-05 21:48:03
view R's profile

I don't really mind the look per se, it's just that I imagine it's a struggle to "properly" view the art. Seems almost disrespectful to turn art into a mere textural element of the home rather then a focal point.

posted by jick on 2008-05-05 22:09:48
view jick's profile

Looks
Very
Bad

posted by Daily Nuance on 2008-05-05 22:14:40
view Daily Nuance's profile

You know what? It looks pretty cool to me, specially in this setting. Who says we have to follow rules all the time?

posted by danze on 2008-05-05 22:30:31
view danze's profile

I like the idea that it can keep growing as well...

posted by starkisst on 2008-05-05 23:52:02
view starkisst's profile

I don't like it at all. It makes me tense to look at it. Move it all down two feet and voy-la.

posted by kimg924 on 2008-05-06 00:26:17
view kimg924's profile

I like it because that would actually finally give me a way to put ALL of my frames and awesome pictures up. My father is a photographer so i'm always finding great pictures of my family that I never knew existed.

posted by redmolly on 2008-05-06 00:45:38
view redmolly's profile

Is stacked pictures aka art the new wall paper?

posted by LoriSF on 2008-05-06 01:18:43
view LoriSF's profile

Don't like it. It's too high, and REALLY jammed together unattractively.

Besides, from what I can see of the artwork, there's nothing that unifies these pictures (nor do they look very interesting, given the limited view of the actual art). What's the point of having a mob of pictures attack the upper corner of your wall?

posted by dblitz1 on 2008-05-06 04:34:58
view dblitz1's profile

The reason "it's not often we see..." is that thankfully most people have sufficient taste not to plaster their art in a corner at ceiling height. So not a fan of this.

posted by LBhirise on 2008-05-06 08:27:13
view LBhirise's profile

I am torn. On the one hand, the arrangement sucks for art viewing: on the other hand, it's a pretty nifty, like, "architectural" element. But I think that in the right place and the right hands it could work really well, so I'm keeping the idea in my groaningly overloaded data bank of ideas. . .

posted by Aulaire on 2008-05-06 09:54:19
view Aulaire's profile

Hmmm.... I recognize this as being something I would not like. But, I'm totally not hating it!

posted by PlanItGirl on 2008-05-06 10:28:38
view PlanItGirl's profile

I'm thinking the person who lives there is a giant. Giants are cool.

posted by Mr. Dangerous on 2008-05-06 12:15:11
view Mr. Dangerous's profile

I guess the art pieces aren't meant to be looked at then... It's art as decoration. The equivalent of buying a painting to match your sofa.

posted by gryt on 2008-05-06 12:32:25
view gryt's profile

For every reason "it's not often we see," however, it's a very, very good thing there are people go against what conventional people label "taste.

I think this treatment is a little whimsical, it goes with the subject's low-key laid-back lifestyle. It's not offensive.

posted by K T G on 2008-05-06 12:34:30
view K T G's profile

OK, I'm not a fan of this. If a piece of art is really art, it deserves to be hung so that it can be appreciated. Clustering, like this, works best with pieces that can't stand on their own. And, in my opinion, this kind of arrangement needs to relate to something in its general vicinity and I'm afraid relating to ceiling just doesn't do it for me. Weird for weird's sake isn't good design. That said -- whatever floats your boat.

posted by Annieo on 2008-05-06 12:56:20
view Annieo's profile

Interesting...although my first reaction was, "Oh, all the art got scared and ran up into the corner to get away!" (I think I've been watching too much anime this month.)

posted by kuroneko on 2008-05-06 13:00:25
view kuroneko's profile

I'd like it if a few more pieces were added that were lower than anything that's there right now.

posted by jon on 2008-05-06 16:58:00
view jon's profile

You'll see art hung this high in lots of homes in the developing world. Not something I ever wanted to imitate, though...

posted by Taureg on 2008-05-06 19:10:51
view Taureg's profile

I was looking at it again... whatever all you are calling "art" that's a shame to clump together and not honor individually and at the proper height, appears to be a few etsy (said in the article), a small stamp collection, some postcards and other clippings and collages, nothing serious.

I am probably not the only one who saves a lot of "silly paper," pictures, cartoons, scraps of a pattern, etc., I'd like to see more than when I'm rummaging through a box, but unlikely to frame in the singular. I think tiling them would be nicer than pinning them to a bulletin board or clipping them to suspended wires, that make the wall look like a studio workspace or a dorm room. Alternately, I could glorify them in a tasteful arrangement at 57 inches high with 2" matting and gilt frames, 16 inches apart and buy those little art lamps for each to set them off against my pure white walls, and a velvet rope barrier just in case you don't have enough class not to touch my art.

posted by K T G on 2008-05-06 20:08:58
view K T G's profile

How can one possibly see the small prints at he top of the arrangement?! I don't like the look at all.

posted by chartreuse on 2008-05-07 18:43:05
view chartreuse's profile

Hi! Thanks for posting this (this is my house) and thank you ALL for your comments. My husband and I are both artists, so we certainly didn't mean to treat artwork disrespectfully or use it as pure decoration...we hung everything this way to unite and display pieces by a variety of artists (friends, family, etsy, etc), odd collections, scraps of paper, etc. I do appreciate the mix of opinions and think that "good taste" should be challenged often.
-Abbey

posted by Aesthetic Outburst on 2008-05-11 10:13:57
view Aesthetic Outburst's profile