apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Art Spotting
San Francisco

8-29-08bird.jpgYesterday we spotted this art and wondered if you, the readers of AT, would be able to identify where we saw it. Any guesses? The answer is after the jump!

 
 

It's Starbucks. We wonder if it'd look good if we took it out of the chain coffee store and put it somewhere else. Like against an exposed brick wall in a loft. What do you think?

Tags

artwork, starbucks

Related Links

Share

Comments (20)

i guessed starbucks or whole foods. shiver.

posted by kdkaboom on 2008-08-29 17:20:08
view kdkaboom's profile

these have been up at starbucks for years

posted by mfpants on 2008-08-29 17:21:53
view mfpants's profile

i like the concept behind some of starbucks' art but the fact that it's always a digital image somewhat cheaply printed takes away all of the texture that would make it interesting. i do think this one in particular could be cool as an original though.

posted by akostalas on 2008-08-29 17:23:25
view akostalas's profile

I thought it looked like a Starbucks piece. That's totally their style.

Definitely not mine.

posted by Mrs.Mack on 2008-08-29 17:24:40
view Mrs.Mack's profile

I'm sorry, but it just looks like art you might buy at a furniture store. Very generic. Even a student art show or community art fair should yield something reasonably priced and more original.

posted by sypage on 2008-08-29 17:30:35
view sypage's profile

KNEW it was starbucks immediately. Boo.

posted by spiralcma on 2008-08-29 17:30:47
view spiralcma's profile

cheap

posted by Emily Booth on 2008-08-29 17:39:14
view Emily Booth's profile

Could tell you that was Starbucks from a mile away. They've been using this style for ages. I think the original would be lovely, but I wouldn't put up the reproduction in my house . I like them at Starbucks though.

posted by MayaB on 2008-08-29 17:46:59
view MayaB's profile

There's no hiding Starbucks bad art.

That proves how many of us go there.

posted by JacksonMarie on 2008-08-29 17:52:06
view JacksonMarie's profile

i knew it was starbucks right away. nothing like massproduced plastic canvas. they're up in the one on campus at fredonia. oh, and paris, and london.

great.

posted by indiasoup on 2008-08-29 18:03:08
view indiasoup's profile

Of course it's Starbucks...... BUT you've gotta give a nod to the illustrator, it's tough to have your style reproduced over and over again to the point of public boredom.

posted by darkblue on 2008-08-29 18:17:44
view darkblue's profile

i thought it was leigh wells
same lamola doodleness
then again i never go to starbucks

posted by paulinet on 2008-08-29 18:37:27
view paulinet's profile

It's nice. But I've always liked Starbucks' style.

posted by Lilli K. on 2008-08-29 19:21:32
view Lilli K.'s profile

When I worked at starbucks and these first started appearing in stores, I originally liked them. But because they were chosen for a generic purpose, they are just that -- generic. But the generic quality is exactly why my bedroom walls are still blank, waiting for me to find something better than generic starbucks art or ikea art or anything of the like. I just want something generic that no one else has put in their bedroom. As much as I see that "keep calm, carry on" poster, it shows that everyone wants the same generic pieces.

posted by serao on 2008-08-29 19:44:53
view serao's profile

If I see one more mixed media bird painting I'm going to hurl. That counts for deer as well...

posted by lizanne on 2008-08-29 20:45:36
view lizanne's profile

It is nice to remember that art is subjective to everyone's tastes and experiences. That being said, the Starbucks "art" can still be valuable or useful, even if it is mass-produced (Andy Warhol soup cans and Velvet Underground album covers, anyone?). Work that is seemingly generic can also become provocative when put in another context. This brings up the original question if it would look good if taken out Starbucks and put in a rougher environment. I think to make it look "good," you would have to juxtapose it with something else (sculpture, photos, something dramatic) to bring out a witty or unexpected quality from it.

posted by jgphotomom on 2008-08-30 02:40:18
view jgphotomom's profile

dumb starbucks art!

posted by superrenee on 2008-08-30 06:37:04
view superrenee's profile

It doesn't look good in Starbucks, it wouldn't look good outside of Starbucks either.

posted by HongKonger on 2008-08-30 07:11:52
view HongKonger's profile

I've never seen it before (or not noticed it maybe) and it's not all that horrible. I think people have a reaction to associations moreso than to the art/picture they're looking at. I wasn't going to give it as much credit as a furniture store, but more like Bed, Bath, and Beyond or stores like that that sell framed prints to fit your decor, you know, derivative and popularly pleasing. My guess was that you found it in Anthropologie because everything tries too hard there to evoke some money out of you, but since everyone has already recognized it from Starbucks, it makes more sense. I'm not a frequent patron of either store, but it's not quite Anthropologie.

posted by K T G on 2008-08-30 16:23:17
view K T G's profile

Hahahah I used to work at sbux. When I saw this painting again it totally brought me back. Yikes!

posted by Claire K on 2008-09-04 19:26:01
view Claire K's profile