apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Norman Peterson's Victorian/Modern Renovation
California Home + Design

4-9-08 np reno.jpgThere seems to be a schism in our fair city between those who adore an old Victorian and those who prefer modern on top of modern. We love Norman Peterson's home because he has managed to meld the two styles into something like a Modernian masterpiece.

4-9-peterson.jpg

Designer Peterson's renovation of an inherited Noe Valley Victorian offers loads of inspiration for anyone looking to combine diverging design styles. While we'd never call an inherited SF house a burden (and if it is we'll happily shoulder that load), we can see how it could be a major challenge to make someone else's preferred aesthetic work for you. We also think adding an architecturally modern addition to a old home takes guts, and it is testament to Norman's visionary design chops that the resulting house looks so spectacular. We wish there were more pictures, though!

The house was featured in the February issue of California Home + Design, but is available to view on sister publication 7x7's website.

Related Posts:
Look!: Liberty Street Victorian

Comments (8)

The interiors look cool, but the outside shots make the addition look like cancer.

It was 3,500sqft before and he needed 900 more to make his family fit? Does he mean his entire extended family?

Nope, one teenager... and an indoor pool.

BARF, saw this just after the slideshow of the great under 600sqft loft w/ family of four.

posted by DahliaCactus on 2008-04-09 12:32:08
view DahliaCactus's profile

The addition is not in the style of the house. There are ways to be modern, yet keep within the original design of the house. This combination of styles does not work for me. It doesn't flow nicely.

posted by suzy8track on 2008-04-09 12:50:09
view suzy8track's profile

the proper way this is generally done is to put the addition on the back, and leave the street face alone... it is pretty much de rigeur in Europe at least, which is how they have managed to preserve the heritage character of their cities so much more than we have...

posted by monika1 on 2008-04-09 13:37:06
view monika1's profile

...I wouldn't mind so much if the front facade were actually a good design, but it is pretty hideous...

posted by monika1 on 2008-04-09 13:42:55
view monika1's profile

the first picture is actually from the back of the house! -lily

posted by sflily on 2008-04-09 15:01:04
view sflily's profile

it's vulgar...
I bet his grandparents raised several children under the original foot print and here he is adding another 900 sq feet to the existing 3500 for a family of THREE, which will dwindle to 2 in a few years once the kid goes to college...

posted by chris_94131 on 2008-04-09 15:56:38
view chris_94131's profile

mea culpa, it *is* the back... it's still ugly though...

posted by monika1 on 2008-04-09 17:24:57
view monika1's profile

Back or not, it looks like bad 80's design to me! There is no transitional relationship with the existing home design. It just looks like some one pasted a block on the back of the house . . .

posted by leslie242 on 2008-04-10 12:59:43
view leslie242's profile
Buy Text Ads