apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


1981 Metropolitan Home of the Month
Metropolitan Home


To our complete delight, we came across an October 1981 issue of Metropolitan Home at the thrift store, and had to bring it home. Flipping through the pages (chock full of cigarette ads and ridiculous big hair) we decided we had to share the Home of the Month with Apartment Therapy readers for a throwback glimpse of high design in the early 80s...

 
 

We have to admit that this home didn't pound us over the head with over-the-top 80s kitch. We rather like some of the elements in the house---we would yank the Corbusier chairs in red lacquer right out of the spread for our own home if we could! The heavy use of cinnamon colors in the parlor is a bit much for our sensibilities by now, but the neutrals in the front sitting area are, dare we say, kind of nice!

Take a peek at this Metropolitan Home of the Month from 28 years ago that combines "century-old architecture with today's sensibilities."

Tags

Design, vintage, Metropolitan Home, 1981, the 80s

Related Links

Share

Comments (19)

you mean "kitsch" not "kitch."

Doesn't anyone edit this thing?

posted by teacupcake on September 3rd 2009 at 5:05pm
view teacupcake's profile

Oh come-on, Teacup, they are putting an enormous amount of interesting stuff on daily, with relatively few errors.

posted by mei-ling on September 3rd 2009 at 5:28pm
view mei-ling's profile

sheesh...tough crowd!

posted by and-she's-nice-too! on September 3rd 2009 at 5:37pm
view and-she's-nice-too!'s profile

I think you're confusing Corbusier chairs with Thonet chairs...
there's nothing by le Corbusier in those pictures.


That said, I find this house not all that dated. It would ba a good candidate for a "Guess the decade".

posted by Daniel Poitiers on September 3rd 2009 at 5:38pm
view Daniel Poitiers's profile

I kinda like it, especially the kitchen. But those obnoxious palm trees would have to go.

posted by Annegret on September 3rd 2009 at 5:39pm
view Annegret's profile

Love the Thonet chairs!

posted by torlee on September 3rd 2009 at 5:52pm
view torlee's profile

Teacupcake's comment is valid. Things are getting worse on this site, IMO, as far as grammar and spelling, although the posts are interesting, entertaining and informative. If there isn't an actual human editor (who might catch the le Corbusier mis-reference, for instance), at least try doing a spell-check! (It won't catch the misplaced apostrophes, but would prevent things like "kitch" ...)!

posted by mirandabee on September 3rd 2009 at 6:06pm
view mirandabee's profile

I just spent five minutes trying to find the Corb chairs!

posted by visualingual on September 3rd 2009 at 6:21pm
view visualingual's profile

Goes to show that design eras aren't uniformly good or bad. Lack of taste can make any style look bad.

posted by slowdown on September 3rd 2009 at 10:24pm
view slowdown's profile

That's kind of amazing. I love those red wicker chairs.

posted by Very Miao on September 3rd 2009 at 11:06pm
view Very Miao's profile

Minus a very few details it doesn't look different from most things in the shelter magazines today.

posted by h144 on September 4th 2009 at 1:16am
view h144's profile

The one thing that looks really dated is the Mao poster. Beware, people with antler decor, deer paintings, and the like! Your mass art will betray you!

Yes, those are Thonet chairs, not from Le Corbusier.

There have always been a fair amount of mistakes on AT. It's put together at top speed on a limited budget. It's free, and it's full of creativity. Count your blessings, people. So "kitsch" is misspelled. Stop being so kitchy.

posted by AustinSarah on September 4th 2009 at 2:24am
view AustinSarah's profile

@ AustinSarah: you make me laugh, in a fabulous way, you are so right...

About the post... Good design is timeless {period}

posted by Jesse Lu on September 4th 2009 at 3:30am
view Jesse Lu's profile

It really isn't that bad. A few small changes and it would be up to date. So it's fairly timeless, I'd say.

posted by Shirlb on September 4th 2009 at 6:29am
view Shirlb's profile

@ AustinSarah - you are spot on with the antlers... I just know they're gonna go quick - and good riddance!

posted by Shirlb on September 4th 2009 at 6:31am
view Shirlb's profile

What's with all the run-on sentences in these comments? Grammar grammar grammar!!!

posted by MARG1E on September 4th 2009 at 8:01am
view MARG1E's profile

thanks for this post...I loved reading that magazine back then, when I was in high school. I don't see how the mao poster is out of date when several recent homes on here have featured mao figurines. It's not my taste, but hardly the item that dates this decor.

I think the 80s gets too much of a bad rap...much as I thought 70s decor got a few years ago. There are good things in any decade.

posted by ec05 on September 4th 2009 at 10:47am
view ec05's profile

If you think back to 1981, interiors were just emerging from a period very similar to the style that is all the rage now: a hodge podge of colors and styles complete with craft touches like crocheted wall hangings. I think what made this home stand out in that context is the emphasis on visual organization and symmetry and the "soft minimalism" in the details (like window coverings). Everything is balanced and in pairs.

I am sure that must have felt like a fresh start after the financial, cultural, and visual chaos of the decade previous.

posted by RichardinLA on September 4th 2009 at 4:21pm
view RichardinLA's profile

I'm surprised no one has remarked upon the table top -- it's granite. This was the beginning of the love-affair with granite. It was still quite rare in 1981 to see it in the home, especially on something like a dining table.

posted by mschatelaine on September 4th 2009 at 5:14pm
view mschatelaine's profile

Feeds

RSS icon San Francisco

+ City Feeds