Clearly these residential stairs aren't up to code, but we can't help but love them anyway. They're so gorgeous. And yes, we love fancy just as much as the next person, but we love it more when natural materials (i.e., wood) gets to show off their natural beauty.










Those are really beautiful - I wonder if the paneling below conceals built-in cabinets?
view bepsf's profile
sorry for naiveté but why aren't these code?
view kollros's profile
I love how they look.
They remind me of Japanese cabinetry for some reason.
I do worry about the possibility of splinters though.
view sciencegeek's profile
Poor trees. Seems a bit wasteful to me.
view chrisr's profile
"I do worry about the possibility of splinters though."
Don't worry sciencegeek, as long as they are sanded properly, there should be no fear of splinters.
view dos's profile
it was the cracked nature of the wood that led me to think that even well sanded steps would produce splinters. unless there were some form of sealant applied.
view sciencegeek's profile
Kollros - Building codes typically require railing or at least hand rail.
view lmsparkie's profile
gorgeous.
re: codes, there are also height and depth requirement for steps as well.
view reb's profile
I'm the kind of doofus who would probably stub my toe on those
view Sassy in SF's profile
I love them. I want them. Especially if they're made of reclaimed wood. Beautiful!
view ejbrammer's profile
Thanks for the clarification. The rise/run did look impractical, and I think it could be adjusted without losing much visual impact.
view kollros's profile
Without digging out the code book, I believe most codes require a handrail on at least one side of the stair. Additionally, any drop off over 30"(if my memory serves) requires a guardrail.
view AdamStL's profile
double. this was posted months ago. several times, i believe.
view loislane's profile
The one on the left looks like a vagina.
view asdf3001's profile