apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Look!: Frank Lloyd Wright's Brandes Residence

8-7-brandes1.jpg
Back in August we saw that this 3 bedroom, two bath house in Sammamish, WA, by iconic architect Frank Lloyd Wright was on the market. It apparently still is, for a cool $1.7 million.

A Usonian house, the Brandes Residence is one of about 50 single-family homes Wright designed with the intention of being affordable for a middle-class family. Built in 1952, it's approximately 1,900 square feet.

8-7-brandes2.jpg

But never mind. We are satisfied to be inspired by the cutouts in the clerestory windows that allow light to dapple the interior in kaleidoscopic designs, or glow from inside at night to decorate the exterior like a kid's nightlight.

8-7-brandes3.jpg

We are also enamoured by the art against the masonry walls, not to mention the heated red concrete floor and Wright's original freestanding and built-in redwood furniture.

8-7-brandes4.jpg

This is one of only three Wright-designed buildings in Washington, and it is listed on the National and State Register of Historic Structures.

8-7-brandes5.jpg

Images: Dan DeLong, Alan Weintraub

Reposted from 8.7.07

Comments (16)

Sigh!!

posted by vbp on 2008-05-14 14:30:08
view vbp's profile

So beautiful - I would love to be able to tour this home. Though understandable, it is too bad his original intentions of affordability no longer apply.

posted by twenty twenty-one on 2008-05-14 14:36:37
view twenty twenty-one's profile

Holy crap, I grew up in Sammamish. What's the address?

posted by comicbookheroine on 2008-05-14 18:32:33
view comicbookheroine's profile

"...it is too bad his original intentions of affordability no longer apply."

To a certain extent, they do still apply - particularly in the use of materials and space planning. When using masonry or wood building materials, there's no need for sheetrock, paint, etc. Deep roof overhangs help protect exterior walls from the effects of the weather. No need for wall-to-wall carpets or wood on heated & stained concrete slab floors. No need for draperies on most windows and no need for much furniture in rooms that have built-in seating and storage cabinets.

posted by bepsf on 2008-05-14 18:43:20
view bepsf's profile

There's a Louis Kahn house up for sale currently too, in Philadelphia...it's going to be auctioned off. Estimates are $2-3 million. The most expensive 1-bedroom house you will ever see, I think.

posted by sniplet on 2008-05-14 18:44:52
view sniplet's profile

I'm actually surprised that it doesn't cost more. The area is really desirable. My parents' home has tripled in value over the past fifteen years.

posted by comicbookheroine on 2008-05-14 18:50:23
view comicbookheroine's profile

bepsf - you are so right about that. My previous comment was more out of envy - and how the average middle-class family would have a hard time purchasing a home for $1.7 million. Oh how I wish!
However I am actually surprised it is not listed for more - the real estate market is insane in most areas of western Washington.

posted by twenty twenty-one on 2008-05-14 19:21:25
view twenty twenty-one's profile

comicbookheroine--

I grew up in Sammamish too, and my best friend lived in the neighborhood above this home (Highland Park). When I saw this photo of it, it's like I knew that was the one!

Growing up I definitely didn't understand the importance of a home like this, but now I wish there were more cool mid-century modern homes available!

posted by iaspire on 2008-05-14 19:26:07
view iaspire's profile

20/21--

You're right about $1.7M being out of the reach of the "Middle Class"...
...What's that - @ $8500/month on a 30-year with 20% down?

But I daresay if this same house were built new on 1/3-1/4 acre, it wouldn't cost half as much.

posted by bepsf on 2008-05-14 19:42:19
view bepsf's profile

Yay Frank!

I'm going to Taliesin and The Johnson Wax Company Administration building this summer. I'm so excited. I can't wait.

Weasel Dearest is Mr. Dangerous

P. S. I wonder if the $1.7 million price tag includes any original furniture?

posted by Weasel Dearest on 2008-05-14 19:51:37
view Weasel Dearest's profile

I've been to a party here and it is a gem. Very boat-like feel with built-ins and small spaces. Nice yard, too -- woodsy.

posted by egay on 2008-05-14 23:23:22
view egay's profile

Wow...that's only 250 sq ft bigger than my apartment! The usonian seems so much bigger though. Granted my place was built in 1906 and is chopped up into a zillion rooms.

Why the heck isn't this way of building popular today? Seems like it would be perfect for our times.

posted by Jason on 2008-05-15 09:09:26
view Jason's profile

"...it is too bad his original intentions of affordability no longer apply."

I'm not sure they ever did apply. Although his intent was affordability, usonian houses cost much more than comparably sized houses at the time they were built. They also cost more to build than Wright told the owners they would cost. These were a niche market then, just as modern "affordable" prefabs are a niche market now.

posted by Shawn on 2008-05-15 11:04:02
view Shawn's profile

I normally don't care for Frank Lloyd Wright. Has anybody been to the museum/home tour in Oak Park? That house appeals to me logically but leaves me cold emotionally. But this one looks good. I really like it.

T8
www.strangeclosets.com

When design takes priority, the result is often strange closets.

posted by t8 on 2008-05-15 12:02:17
view t8's profile

While it's beautiful, I can't say I'd ever want to live there. It allows for very little customization or even just bringing in one's own furniture, artwork, and design preferences.

posted by Erika in Seattle on 2008-05-15 17:31:08
view Erika in Seattle's profile

"To a certain extent, they do still apply..."

Nope. Masonry and stain-grade wood interior finishes are significantly more expensive than sheetrock and paint, both in materials and labor. The equipment and installation costs for hydronic radiant to heat concrete floors are pretty much astronomical, and built-in millwork is an additional cost above standard construction that is unlikely to be less than the cost of purchasing furniture (unless you do all your shopping at dwr, anyway...)

That's even leaving aside the costs for the huge runs of glazing, and the structural gymnastics to make the glazing work.

Probably, 'half as much' as 1.7m isn't an unreasonable estimate. But that's still not affordable.

posted by sniplet on 2008-05-16 19:58:36
view sniplet's profile
Buy Text Ads