apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


Silver Desktop Letter Opener at See Jane Work

10-21-letteropener.jpgWe've never owned a letter opener, but staring at the pile of, well, partially destroyed envelopes sitting on our desk makes us wonder if we should consider one. This Silver Desktop Letter Opener from See Jane Work may be the ticket.

 
 

Its sleek design reminds of of Elsa Peretti's jewelry line for Tiffany's, which is never a bad thing in our book. An even better thing? The price is much, much less than anything we could buy that would come in one of those pretty blue boxes.

$15 at See Jane Work

Tags

pillows, decorative & office accessories

Related Links

Share

Comments (14)

Or try:

Key, $0, at Already On Your Key Ring And Doesn't Involve Buying Another Knickknack.

posted by CJL on October 21st 2008 at 9:04am
view CJL's profile

JUNK. Stop pushing clutter.

posted by VLADCOLE on October 21st 2008 at 9:16am
view VLADCOLE's profile

a butter knife does the same trick and you already own it.

posted by atlantadesigner on October 21st 2008 at 9:42am
view atlantadesigner's profile

Sheesh people. I like it! Great stocking stuffer for $15 and I thought the exact same thing, I actually thought it WAS from Tiffany.

posted by Tiffany on October 21st 2008 at 9:50am
view Tiffany's profile

I actually like this kind:

http://www.staples.com/office/supplies/p1_Letter-Openers_10557_Business_Supplies_10051_SEARCH

As far as stocking stuffers, I think I'd probably be underwhelmed about getting a letter opener! Anyway, I thought we were trying to get the people to stop sending us junk and being kind of paperless with your bills. Then, still, I might wonder why there's a pile of torn envelopes on the desk. Throw them in the trash/recycling, as you go! What kind of outfit is this that can't stick with the program?

posted by K T G on October 21st 2008 at 10:37am
view K T G's profile

I like it too - There's something to be said for simple, elegant and well-made items that improve your life...

...the cheap plastic thingamagigs from Staples just don't cut it.

posted by bepsf on October 21st 2008 at 10:50am
view bepsf's profile

Dear Apartment Therapy,

I think your site's great. But please, PLEASE, stop writing "it's" for possessive. "It's" means "it is"; "its" is the possessive.

I have seen this error several times in the last few days alone. I understand that blogs may not have editorial staff and posts may be written quickly, but come on, this is elementary grammar.

Thanks,
jess

posted by jesster on October 21st 2008 at 11:43am
view jesster's profile

bepsf - I agree the ordinary plastic staples letter opener is nothing to look at it, but that's what desk drawers are for. I find traditional letter openers to be more of a hassle then just using my opposable thumbs for something they're naturally good at, and prefer the functional staples type especially for volumes of mail (the types I might have to handle at work, moreso). I would probably be sort of impressed with an elegant version of the $2 cutter, but not overly so. I don't find fancy doodads like a letter opener to be money well-spent.

posted by K T G on October 21st 2008 at 12:04pm
view K T G's profile

Oh, Jess, I can't even tell you how many times I have irritated an AT blogger with my lecture on its v. it's. It seems to do no good at all. I wish AT would at least have its (ITS!) bloggers team up to proof-read for each other. They're supposed to be professional writers. You'd think they could at least get elementary grammar sorted out.

posted by Jezebella on October 21st 2008 at 2:37pm
view Jezebella's profile

Sweet Jesus, Jesster and Jezebella! Have you nothing better to do than snipe at typos in a blog? Everyone makes the occasional slip, and its/it's is - as you point out - a very common one. As is their/there. Writers do know the difference, but everyone - even you two, one suspects - makes the error from time to time.

Of course, for all the prescriptive advice your posts dole out, their real function is demonstrative pedantry; YOU are on the ball, the writers are not! YOU are so sensitive to poor grammar that a misplaced inverted comma wounds you deeply!

God, life must be a cavalcade of dissatisfactions for the two of yaz!

posted by Jaze on October 21st 2008 at 2:44pm
view Jaze's profile

Let's see, we're so lacking a life that we comment on a blog post; YOU are so lacking a life that you're commenting on a comment. Who's the over-sensitive pedant here??

Pot, kettle. Wev.

posted by Jezebella on October 21st 2008 at 4:20pm
view Jezebella's profile

Here, let me make your night by commenting on your comment on my comment on your comment!

I posted not because I care about your pedantry (nor about my own) but because a living, breathing human wrote the original post, in which they made the trivial error that you and your hyperalgesic consort pounced on. Paid blogging can be very hard work indeed, with tight time constraints; with deadline pressures, errors become more likely.

Since your investment in this free web site is limited to the time you spend reading it, your only real loss here is the time it took you to parse the error - perhaps a half second?

What you chose to do with that error was to berate someone whose hard work you feel comfortable picking apart - particularly fine sport since you read their work gratis. Since writers tend to take pride in their work, and since the post and its attendant comments are broadcast to a large audience, your decision to punish the loss of a half second of your time with a public harangue feels a bit like bullying to me.

posted by Jaze on October 21st 2008 at 5:00pm
view Jaze's profile

ROFLMAO!! I like the letter opener - but i LOVE Jaze's comments!!!

Jaze, YOU ROCK!!!!!

posted by little flower on October 22nd 2008 at 8:30pm
view little flower's profile

The its / it's mistakes DO need to go. They're silly and lame.

posted by VLADCOLE on October 27th 2008 at 7:39pm
view VLADCOLE's profile

Feeds

RSS icon San Francisco

+ City Feeds