apartment therapy changing the world, one room at a time


How Cramped is Your Castle?

2007_04_02_gulliver.jpgAs Gulliver noted during his travels, *small* is a relative concept. It has a lot to do with geography.

We're wondering just how many of our readers live in spaces small enough to qualify for this April's annual Smallest, Coolest Apartment Contest, which means less than 650 square feet.

What's perceived as small here in San Francisco? In the greater Bay Area? In Portland and Seattle? What about in Missoula? Vancouver? Tokyo?

 
 

Image: cooperkk

Tags

Surveys

Related Links

Share

Comments (11)

725

posted by mariegael on April 2nd 2007 at 8:50pm
view mariegael's profile

800 sqft or 74m² Paris, FR.

posted by loki on April 3rd 2007 at 2:36am
view loki's profile

485 Square feet, in the greater Tel Aviv area. I'm leaving it in a few months to move to Munich, and have been putting off doing anything of value with it knowing that I'd be leaving.

posted by rappy on April 3rd 2007 at 5:10am
view rappy's profile

175 sq.m. in Madrid Spain

posted by Sofia on April 3rd 2007 at 5:27am
view Sofia's profile

Portland, Oregon - just moved into a duplex with my fiance, approximately 1400 square feet. My ex lives upstairs! Between the two households we have three kids, three adults, and a law office in a 2600 sq ft building. The kids have their own rooms for the first time ever.

posted by KC on April 3rd 2007 at 8:41am
view KC's profile

600 sq ft, partner and I in a one bedroom in SF.

posted by hja on April 3rd 2007 at 8:46am
view hja's profile

I can't believe that my tiny eat-in kitchen does not qualify for the Smallest Coolest Kitchen contest! It's less than 90 square feet, and I've fit a table for four, a small library, beautiful art, comfortable seats, nice lighting, and a fully functional kitchen with full size stove, fridge, sink, good counter space, etc.! Why couldn't that be a contender?? Oh, and it has the most adorable little 1 foot by 1 1/2 foot window.... My entire apartment is in 560 sq ft, in Manhattan.

posted by Sea on April 3rd 2007 at 8:50am
view Sea's profile

Yeah, the SCK upper size limit (65 sq ft) is awfuly small. I have an 88 sq ft kitchen and it certainly doesn't feel anything but small.

posted by hja on April 3rd 2007 at 1:34pm
view hja's profile

They should recognize two types of kitchen: under 65 sq. ft., and a 'potentially eat-in kitchen' category which would be under 90 sq. ft.
Certainly, there are plenty of 'small space' challenges in the latter!

posted by Sea on April 3rd 2007 at 1:48pm
view Sea's profile

We're in Seattle. Our house is 1440 SF, but my family (2 adults, two kids--6YO and 2YO) live in the upstairs and we rent out the basement. The four of us live in ~780 SF.
Definitely cozy, but it feels palatial compared to our last house (moved last spring) which was just shy of 700 SF. Layout makes a huge difference!

posted by AngieK on April 4th 2007 at 9:58am
view AngieK's profile

Missoula? Thats where I'm from! Any other MT's here?

posted by woodt3 on April 5th 2007 at 9:50am
view woodt3's profile

Feeds

RSS icon San Francisco

+ City Feeds