If you had to live with just 10 possessions, what would they be? The topic of living with less seems very much in the zeitgeist. Perhaps born from the pains and pits of a recession, people are embracing the idea of paring our lives down to the necessities, using technology to simplify their lives down to the things that matter (what those things are vary from person to person). Others are just trying to escape the grasp of technology in our everyday lives; our own boss recently documented his losing battle while being on vacation unplugged).
There's a popular story going around right now originating from the BBC News, Cult of less: LIving out of a hard drive, which notes the spartan lifestyle of a 22-year-old software engineer who has whittled down his possessions to a "laptop, an iPad, an Amazon Kindle, two external hard drives, a "few" articles of clothing and bed sheets for a mattress that was left in his newly rented apartment."
Another Less Is More Cultist (our label, not their own) is described as living from just a "backpack full of designer clothing, a laptop, an external hard drive, a small piano keyboard and a bicycle - an armful of goods that totals over $3,000 in value," noting the freedom he's experienced since digitizing his life has unchained him from responsibilities such as organizing, cleaning and dusting. Something tells us he never really had much to clean or organize in the first place, as minimalists tends to be born, not made, but it is a notable achievement, nonetheless. How many of us could give away all our possessions and live with just enough to fit into one large box?
We've been adopting similar, though much more modest, habits with similar hopes of uncluttering our lives. One doesn't have to throw away everything and give up nearly all their possessions to appreciate what these more extreme practitioners have learned (note, these examples seem like young, single men who live in urban areas). We started by simply digitizing albums we hardly listened to anymore and stored it away in duplicate on a couple of external drives. The same was done with the bulk of our DVD collection, since most movies were watched just once or twice before becoming quasi-decorative items (maybe huge DVD/CD collections could benefit by organization by colour). The space we got back was notable (both my girlfriend and I have a collector's itch that we scratched all too often).
My current personal challenge is avoiding purchasing any new physical books for the rest of the year. I can do without new clothes or music, but I do love my books, graphic novels and other printed matter. On one hand, that must sound horrible to lovers of printed matter. But then again, I am enjoying books for their content via my Kindle App on the iPad, while also using that tried and true public resource, the nearby public library. As someone who lives in a modest space, I'll eventually restart purchasing books, but will adopt a much more stringent requirement to live happily with less and only keep books I truly want to revisit. Less can be more...but sometimes it's just less.
How has technology helped you in paring down your life? Or has it? And if you were asked to keep just 10 possessions, how many of them would be technology items?
Comments (14)
The battle to pare down is one I'm losing right now but Craigslist and cash always help.
Technology doesn't take up much space in my life as my cell phone and desktop are all I need. Digital camera is close second. Don't have the iPad yet but its possible that could be a keeper.
I'm trying to pare down the number of Photo Album's in the house. My girlfriend's mother has a digital camera, but still insist on printing every single picture - hence dozens of albums. I've finally convinced her that 1 or 2 digital photo frames in the house might be a good alternative... its all about baby steps. Next up, digitizing all of her undergrad papers (there are boxes & boxes).
I too have recently been taken with this as I love small spaces and love the freedom that it has given me in both time, money, mental well being etc. I am not this extreme but I have adopted this idea. I got rid of my TV (along with a $100.00 cable bill) and am working on getting an ipad. You would be amazed at how much better it all feels.
The less is more "cult" seems like it would be quite wasteful in reality. There was no mention whatsoever of anything kitchen-related. Do they eat out for every meal, disposing of everything that comes along with it (including the extra money)?
i love how less is more, but a number of people still comment on buying an ipad to supplement their computer... b/c it can do sooo much more than your computer and is totally necessary for everyday life, right? not like a pesky roof or pots and pans to cook food or a bar of soap.
I agree with takife... how in the world is having a laptop AND an Ipad downsizing? The Ipad has only been out for a few months; how can it be an essential item? What were people doing before?
My best friend is a bit of a nomad, and has, over the past 5 years, lived for a time in Ohio, Illinois, Minnesota and Pennsylvania. He drives a Pontiac Vibe, and has done his best to parse down what he owns to what can fit in his car, in case of another move.
It's not so much technology that's the big help, it's flat-packable furniture. Though he doesn't have a whole lot of clothes - maybe 3 laundry loads worth - and his desktop computer uses his TV as a monitor. He also has a netbook laptop that will someday dock to his tower.
@Ansela, according to the article, he now couch-surfs at friends' houses. That's not downsizing, that's mooching. He kind of reminds me of people who claim they aren't materialistic/live simply because they don't own a car or some other big ticket item, but then constantly borrow from friends or beg rides.
This is an interesting post. I'll check back on it to learn more.
1) wedding rings
2) the framed picture of my grandparents on their wedding day.
3) the quilt my mother hand stiched for my husband. It's made from his grandpa's flannel shirts.
4) are dogs possessions or people? ;) Let's count Logan & Rocco for good measure.
5) my signed guitar that I've lugged from concert to concert.
6) the antique table my mother gave me
7) the desk I built for my husband as a wedding gift
8) the watch he gave me for our first Christmas
9) my moleskine journals
10) DH's diploma from Bible College
Our wedding album is digital otherwise that would have been at the top of my list. :)
Why specifically designer clothing?
FYI: One of the people mentioned in the original BBC piece was interviewed further by BBC, listing pros and cons he's learned since embarking on a life with less here:
"The Cult of Less project is not something that I can ever stop cold turkey. Throughout the coming years, I will be adding new possessions to my list occasionally. Embarking on the project has characteristically changed how I view owning things. Sure, buying less is probably environmentally friendlier. Sure, my friends think I'm (really) weird. Sure, there might be things that could make my life a bit easier occasionally. But now everything thing I own serves a purpose and holds a certain beauty in its role. The idea is utilitarian and far-fetched, but it's a small price to pay for being happy."
I have a great way he can survive with even less possessions. Using external hard drives is a bit old fashioned. Nowadays using cloud storage you can store all your digital life online and accesses it anywhere meaning that you certainly don’t need an external hard drive and you don’t even need to own a computer or laptop if you are prepared to use internet cafes ect. I use Livedrive.com which has unlimited online storage and backup, it seems pretty good as you can access all your files from anywhere.
The only problem I see with digitizing everything is that technology changes so quickly that "new" forms of it are obsolete in a relatively short period of time. Let's not forget that the more parts something has, the more there is to go wrong. In the year 2097, our descendants might still have a few photographs of us in a shoe box, but do you think they'll still be using our digital photo frames?
Paring down to the extent these people are ignores most humans' need to feel connected to their ancestors and to leave a legacy. And there's nothing wrong with living life with a bit of sentiment. We can't all be stoics.