Recently, at SXSW 2012, we had the pleasure of hearing Jay Shafer of Tumbleweed Tiny House Company extol the virtues of living in a small space. While he admits that living in 100 square feet might not be for everyone, his talk contained plenty of tips that apply to anyone looking to live efficiently.
While we live in 600 sq feet (two adults, no pets or kids) and are no McMansion owners, we admit to being kind of taken aback by the idea of living in 100 sq ft. However, that response changed once we heard Jay speak at SXSW. Not only do we now not think the idea "crazypants", but more importantly, we've walked away with some great tips on how to make better use of the space we live in. Here are a few from Jay that we think are great whether you live in 100 or 1000 sq ft:
1. Pare Down: Figure out what you need in your home to be happy and get rid of everything else. It's that simple. The first major purge of items is painful, but Jay assures us it does get easier. Once you've gotten rid of a lot of stuff and are only left with your happy essentials, it's fine for them to be organized densely — the trick is to find the right balance between dense and crowded.
2. Live artfully: Before Jay began living in a tiny houses he had quite a bit of art. He realized as he began to cut down on his possessions that it's all about living artfully as opposed to having a lot of art. Can his home still be a peaceful, restful, artful space despite not being filled with art? For him, the answer was yes.
3. Think Small: Jay defines every home where every square foot is being used as a small house. While during his single days Jay was able to live in 100 sq ft, now that he is married with a child and another one on the way, he and his family live in 500 sq ft. Extra space is extra space that needs to be heated and cooled. Be efficient and live only in the amount that you and your family need, living smarter not larger.
4. Design & Quality: If you are living in a small home, live well. In order to make it all work in such a tiny space, everything needs to be well designed, and Jay suggests using quality materials. After all, while those quality materials might cost a small fortune in a 1,000 sq ft home, it's a pittance when using it for a home that's a few hundred sq ft. It's about quality and good design sense, not quantity.
5. Multi-Tasking & Clever Thinking: In a small space there is not much room for uni-taskers. One of the elements in his tiny houses that Jay is most proud of is the combination sink, shower, and tub. He experimented with the right size for the sink/shower/tub and finally settled on what worked for him. The question he asks himself when designing is: does this feel small? Our take-away is do what works best for you and your family and think creatively. While a specific solution might not work for your great aunt, if it works for you, great. It's your house!
Of course these ideas are just the tip of the iceberg, and Jay has many, many more. So much more, in fact, that he wrote a book, The Small House Book, which also includes plans for tiny houses that you can build. We're glad that we went to his panel at SXSW and are now more inspired than ever to really pare down during Spring cleaning this year, and make 2012 the year we keep around only what makes us happy.
For more information on Jay, his small home philosophy, and the houses he builds, check out Tumbleweed Tiny House Company.
(Images: Joelle Alcaidinho & Tumbleweed Tiny House Company)











White Enamel Flatwa...
My biggest problem with these are the fact you have to climb up a ladder to bed every night.....and down in the mornings. Sounds like a very good way to break a leg trying to get to the bathroom in the middle of the night.
Would love to see some floorplans - just curious!
I agree with Greenwoodgal. What would be so wrong for the place to be 200 sq ft, just so it could have the bed downstairs, and maybe some storage upstairs. The heat upstairs in the Summer would be oppressive, and climbing a ladder every time a person needs to come down or use the rest room seems ridiculous . This fad seems to go too far.
I have to agree with Edin & Greenwoodgal. I love the idea of this, but 100SF seems overly restrictive. I don't see the purpose of having to combine a sink with a tub & shower. Is it really that extravagant to have a sink AND a place to bathe? And the ladder to bed sounds like an accident waiting to happen. And totally unfeasible if you have kids or if you get old.
I'm in for the quality materials, and I think it is a great idea to pare down to the essentials. I just think that stories on this kind of living always focus on such extreme cases that it is hard to imagine how that could actually apply to my life.
I believe that zoning laws are the main reason why these "tiny houses" have such a small footprint. The tiny house has to fall within these dimensions to be "legal" as a kind of mobile home so as to not have to follow more restrictive zoning regulations that would apply to most stationary housing.
Picture # 1 = The. Cutest. House. Ever.
Just love that red trim, the gables, those windows, the picket fence, the untamed garden...
I live in a rental (studio flat) of a little over 130 square feet due to limited housing for those of us who like to live alone in a small university town, and it can be restrictive. My main issue is that it came furnished so I can't get rid of most of the furniture that came with the flat, despite not needing all of it, however I wish I could pare it down! It's busy to the point that re-arranging is almost impossible (probably my fault for buying a 6ft sofa bed, even though I can't get rid of the bed that came supplied...)
I'm not sure if I could cope with 100 square ft, but if I can adapt to 130, I'm sure it wouldn't be that much of a jump, although as a History student, I do need a substantial amount of shelving space, I guess. I LOVE the ladder bed, having had something similar as a child!
I applaud people who can live this way, but I'm not a minimalist. It's a lot like living in a motor home or RV -- some can, some can't. I think those who CAN are usually people with rich outer lives: they simply aren't home all that much, preferring to be at work, socializing outside of the home, eating in restaurants, hanging out in cafes, hiking and camping, things like that.
But I craft. Messily! And I have and need pets in my life, which need space to run around safely (indoor cats, house rabbit...) And my partner is a home theater buff, so we entertain by showing movies in a dedicated room. (None of the rooms in our house are MacMansion large, but we do have that special one...) And I can happily hole up in my house for a whole week-long vacation, rarely leaving. (I'd freak out in 100 square feet, these days! I might have pulled it off when I was single and had no pets, as long as a laundry was included in my space -- but no longer.)
It's a wonderful eco-friendly way to live if you can really do it. However, you might not be able to do it in existing properties, since, like RV's and motor homes, every inch really needs to be optimized probably from the get-go, or the space is functionally too small. So you'd probably NEED to build, and deal with zoning variances, and end up with a cute dollhouse that you might quickly outgrow and that might be hard to sell. I love the concept, but I'm suspicious of the practicality.
While I think these tiny houses are beautiful and thought-provoking, it seems to me that it is just as sustainable, if not more so, to embrace group housing and shared spaces.
great concept.
I clicked the link and found out they also offer larger homes...one is 800+ square feet.
I think this would be a great idea for a cabin! I am now dreaming of buying a lot on a lake and moving one of these tiny houses onto it. The perfect dwelling for an area where most of your time is spent outdoors.
I have a life-long fantasy of my very own little space - maybe a gypsy caravan or a little houseboat. I love these tiny houses.
In reality, though, I don't think I could live permanently in something so small, even by myself. Certainly I couldn't do it with my family and pets etc.
And it seems greedy and kind of missing the point, to want a tiny space in addition to the rest of the space I already have.
So.... it remains a fantasy.
Yes, cute. But how energy-efficient and sustainable is a house, whose outer walls make up probable more than three times of the living space?!
Regards from Europe!
So true Clampers, I think these would make perfect cabins!
I think the most important takeaway should be that we should respect and appreciate the diversity available to us in the first world and not point fingers at others who live in a way that is different.
I'm all for sustainable living, but it's important to take care of yourself, your family, and your friends. I could never, in good conscience, put my family in a home smaller than was adequate for our needs. Right now it's just the two of us, but we need our space. Not just for our stuff, but for what we enjoy about our home life - cooking, having friends over, etc. To take that away is denying ourselves what we find enriching.
Some of us like smaller homes and some of us like larger homes. Some of us want a yard, some of us prefer a high-rise apartment. Some of us really, really, really want that 50s rambler with historical architecture and gorgeous wood floors, and some of us can't afford that or can't fix a house to do that, so we buy a cookie cutter house built in the 1990s. THAT'S OKAY.
Thanks for the post! Full disclosure: I work for Tumbleweed and we love Apartment Therapy around here!
While I could not live in such a small place full-time, I do think these houses are great as an adult version of a playhouse (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/24/garden/24cottage.html) or Swedish sommarstuga....
Great concept! Not sure I would want to hike up and down a ladder to go to the bathroom from the bedroom. O.o
And why couldn't they have shown this with a nicely landscaped yard? I would think the point is, "save money and have a nice yard"....
My studio apartment is 168 square feet (that includes the bathtub), and I've lived here for 2 years. I have a full-sized bed on the floor, a table, desk, small bookshelf, and large shelving unit for storage. I have a full kitchen with an apartment-sized refrigerator, stove/oven, and even a dishwasher. It's cozy, but comfortable. The key is paring down your possessions to what you really need. I purge my closet at least twice a year, and I don't buy anything unless I have an exact purpose and place for it.
We currently live in 450 sq. ft.It's just right for two people, but if we started a family, it would get crowded real quick. The need for space changes with life. Young singles and empty nesters don't need as much space, and adding in the current economic uncertainty, we are seeing a real interest in compact well-designed spaces.
I like the idea that things need to be multifunctional. That they need to have utility and then be attractive. We all love our things...but this type of model forces us to get rid of something before something new comes in. Also, less space can help us get out of our cocoons, out in nature or the world in general...or just learn to be respectful of people's quiet time when together in tight quarters.
117 sq foot model with main floor bedroom:
http://www.tumbleweedhouses.com/houses/lusby/
We own a "travel trailer" (a pull-behind camper) that is about 300 sq. feet. My husband and I have often said we could easily live in it full-time, and indeed we have, even with our 2 small children. Granted, it takes a giant pickup truck to haul the thing, but I love the feeling of having our "home" on our backs when we travel. We plan to retire in one, when the children leave the nest. I was ambivalent when we bought it, but I LOVE LOVE LOVE it now. I don't see the Tumbleweed Tiny Houses as much different -- except more aesthetically pleasing.
This works great for some people; others not so much. We can all take something away from the discussion though. On a very basic level it's about thinking about where you live, what you surround yourself with, and making conscious choices about them. Think about why you make the choices you make.
I currently live in 200 square feet. It works great for me. It's just the right amount of space. I don't need to spend a lot of time cleaning, and I get to save money to use for things that are more important to me. And yes, I am a homebody with a lot of crafts and books, and I cook everything from scratch. I love my tiny home. Hopefully everyone can say they love where they live.
I wonder about intimacy in very small spaces. I need my personal space, and while I love small and efficient kitchen, I'd go crazy bumping into my husband or child all the time.
Also, I wonder why nobody ever mentions that those are great tips even if you live in a bigger space. Minimalism has nothing to do with square footage ! It's a way of life you can implement everywhere. I know I try to do it.
multi functional is the way to go and can be used in any size space. there was a great AT post where folks had an artful folding table hung on the wall. [wish i had seen that before we purchased our drop leaf]. i had an idea for a coffee table that turns into a regular table by putting a glass top on a piano stool. underbed storage also seems to be skipped a lot. if you can deal with one or two steps up to bed [rather than a ladder of a true loft] build boxes of use 3/4" ply apprx 24 * 48, depending on size of bed and a top to unify you gain a huge amount of storage in an otherwise wasted space. I've been moving walls around [smaller but more bedrooms] to make better use of the space we have. my parnter in crime lived on a boat for a decade, and we have implemented several boat-like space use ideas in the house, to great effect
I can't take this guy seriously. That 100 square foot home isn't wired for electricity (unless you run an extension cord from someone else's home), or plumbed for running water. Didn't he use a bucket for his toilet? And his water source was a dispenser on the countertop?
He talks about quality materials. But that's ridiculous when you don't even have the means to wash your hands in your own home.
I'm all for primative living, if that's what you want. But primative living is not the same as small space living; and I think he confuses the issues and does a disservice to all of us small-space dwellers by making it appear that we all are willing to give up our toilets and electricity in order to save some space.
I live in an RV that has about 125 square feet total, including the sleeping loft area, and have learned that layout, not square footage, is the secret to a great home. I have all the luxuries I want: huge shower with skylight, dishwasher, AC, furnace, big fridge and freezer, etc. I work from home and can shut the door to my dedicated office at the end of the day, hang out in the living room, then climb up to the loft area to sleep. GreenwoodGal, I love sleeping up high and the ladder is angled, so it's more of a steep staircase than a ladder, so getting up and down is no big deal.
@Edin
Exactly. Even upped to 150 sq ft, there might be enough room to squeeze a twin or full size bed in somewhere. I'd prefer the upstairs to house a home office, small reading/lounge room, etc. I'd rather have a tiny bedroom just barely big enough to hold the bed and a lamp than basically a mattress on the floor in one of those loft areas.
@Hazygirl
Actually, our homes can be wired and have plumbing set up just like an RV. Since most are built by our customers, you can pretty much mod the house the way you want it. Jay knows that there are plenty of options for those who like to live small. Tumbleweed is just one of them. Even Jay lives in a 500 sq. ft. house now that he has a growing family.
@Loora, YES!! Personal space is so important.
These homes would have been perfect for me when I was single and childfree. 100 sq. feet doesn't exactly call out to visitors, so I would have had my own cozy place to get away from everyone when I needed to recharge. But now that I have my daughter, it's just not enough space. I'd sell her to the circus. ;)
Still, these would be great for single young adults. And the tips are good for everyone, even a thirtysomething with a small child and a bunch of pets.
@GREENWOODGAL I think that's a silly excuse. Maybe 100 sqft wouldn't work for you, but climbing up a ladder? I live in a loft, and honestly it's no different than stairs first thing in the morning. And even if ladders were a problem, say for the elderly, why not make a tiny house with a ground-level bedroom? Sounds like you're just being stubborn about keeping your McMansion!
It's not incredibly bad. You only have to remember never to shift your furniture.
When I was twelve, I had bunkbeds, and made the mistake of changing which side faced the wall. I fell off the first night, thinking I going to lean against a wall.
I have to laugh at the comments about the ladder being an issue. I've lived for almost five years in a bit more space - 280 square feet - and I sleep in a loft with a ladder. I'm almost fifty - probably a lot older than some of you kids! - I have horrible vision, and had a medical condition at one point that limited muscle movement and I have NEVER had an issue with the climbing up and down - I like to think the ladder keeps me mobile and uses muscles that I wouldn't otherwise use :)
Living alone (usually with a cat) and child-free by choice, I've always opted for small spaces - the smaller, the better, since I don't like owning a lot of things and I'm not fond of housekeeping at all. Many of the guidelines above are just second-nature to me. I love the Tumbleweed homes - I really don't think living in one would be problematic at all since they are so well-designed.
I love hearing about people's experiences in small homes. I can't imagine doing 100 square feet (I live in an 800 square foot studio space now attached to my parent's home). But, if I was alone (my bf lives with me) and I could pare down my life the way I'm working on, I don't think it's impossible or unbearable. Particularly if it enabled me to have the freedom to make other big changes in my life. If I could write instead of working a high pressure corporate job, had more time to exercise and had nice outdoor space available too, I can see it definitely working.
I had considered whether we should have a loft in my current space but heat becomes issue in Hawaii and although I wish I had a for sleeping or office/crafts from time to time, I would've lost some of the insulation that keeps my home cool (I wonder the same about a tiny home). I did worry about climbing up and down as I'm no spring chicken.
I love small space living and the only time I wish for a bigger home is during Christmas. It would be nice to leave my crafts out rather than having to always put everything away since my work surfaces are multi - functional.
I'm in the position of designing a very small living space for myself. Currently live in a ~1000sf house, but making plans to live in ~450sf. Of course lots of things have to go, but it's amazing what one can fit into that kind of space. So far I've got a claw foot tub/shower, full size stove, full size fridge, separate freezer, stacking washer/dryer, etc.
Was considering a loft sleeping area, but have now moved it 'downstairs' --- mainly so the doggies can still sleep at the foot of the bed :-) ---- up a few feet with a short 'closet' & storage under. (hmmm, may need to rethink that as they do fall off the bed on occasion).
Graph paper, a pencil & eraser are my friends right now.