Alphabetical: This is the most obvious organizational method, and probably the most reliable. You can do it like the libraries do and alphabetize by the author's last name (e.g. Austen, Brown, Christie, etc.) or you can be a little daring and alphabetize by title (e.g. Da Vinci Code, Emma, Murder on the Orient Express, Pride & Prejudice). Remember, "the" and "a" don't count.
Genre: If you have a bunch of different kinds of books, you might want to arrange them by genre. My own "library" is divided into the following sections: Fiction, Mystery, Reference, Art and Design Books, and Young Adult (I love Young Adult books. It's my dirty secret. Twilight was my gateway book.) Your library might include Graphic Novels, Science Fiction, Crocheting, Werewolves, or whatever it is you're interested in. Breaking things into genres can be tricky — why should Mystery be separate from Fiction, for example? — but as long as the categories make sense to you, the system will work.
Color: Now we're getting controversial. If you don't need to access particular books all the time, OR if you can easily identify your books by their spine color, then this could be for you. You can arrange them chromatically across a whole bookshelf or arrange them in color blocks. And you can have shelves where you alternate chunks of black and white so it looks like stripes. Lots of cool options for you! But again, you have to be okay not knowing where stuff is…
Color: Advanced Option #1: Arrange your books into patterns, like the American flag!
Color: Advanced Option #2: For the intrepid DIY-er, you can cover all of your books with kraft paper or other wrapping so they are all the same color. I would then recommend arranging them in some sort of order (and maybe labeling them neatly in white ink?) unless they really are just for show.
Chronological: For the nerds. This is how I arrange my art and design books, so the section starts with Ancient Greece, progresses to the Middle Ages, the Renaissance, the 18th century and then goes along by artistic movement (Art Nouveau, Wiener Werkstatte, Art Deco, Streamlining, etc.). I told you it was for the nerds.
Autobiographical: Remember in the movie "High Fidelity," how Rob (John Cusack) rearranges his records autobiographically, in the order that he discovered each one? You could do that with books. Caution: this probably only works if that's how your mind works. If someone says, The Great Gatsby, and you think, "junior year of high school!" Or if you think about Neruda's poems and immediately remember reading them during a particular relationship you had in 2003, then this could be a cool way to organize your books.
The Combo: This is a custom setting for those of us who aren't totally consistent. As I mentioned, I like to separate my books by genre. I like to arrange my fiction alphabetically by author's name. My non-fiction, however, I separate further into subject sub-sections, like Art & Design, Biography, Film Studies, etc., and then within those sub-headings I arrange them chronologically by subject.
Stacks: And though most of us arrange our books standing upright, stacks can be an aesthetically pleasing way to go (see image 8), especially for a smaller book collection. This method is physically better for the books, so it's something to consider seriously if you have any old or rare books.
How do you like to organize your books?
Images: 1 colourlovers; 2-5 Anna Hoffman; 6 Jamie Schwaberow for the New York Times; 7 Domino via ATNY; 8 Marie Burgos Design blog.









Z2 iPod Dock and Wi...
Is this a sister post to the DC one yesterday? The same conversation is going on over there. It must be national bookshelf week...
I recently organized mine by color and love it. Visually appealing, and for visual people like me who remember how the book appears in their mind, makes it very easy to locate.
I'd love organize it by colors...but for me it's better gender... but colors oooooohh!
I'm a reader, writer and academic, and I love the by-color way of organizing books.
I am an avid reader and find that organizing first by genre, then by most times read to least times read is the most helpful system for me. Color organization, while it looks nice, would never work for me.
I love it by color- its so appealing!
I will purchase books only if their spines are either red, white, or blue just so they won't disturb my American flag color scheme.
(Seriously, I hope that particular suggestion was intended to be tongue-in-cheek)
We organize the bulk of ours by genre: film history, film/general bios, screenplays, books about Andy Warhol (I knooow), art/design/vintage culture, graphic novels, fiction, and textbooks. And then I have some girlier ones in the bedroom: books on fashion/beauty, childcare (I work with kids) more vintage culture.
You're all wrong. You have to do it my way or it's wrong.
wait. . .
there is no wrong, is there?
I organize by genre, subject within genre, alphabetical order by authors last name. There's nothing quite like being able to find the exact book you are looking for and immediately know which book has been borrowed just by where the space is in the shelf.
Medeina @ http://whencatsfish.blogspot.com/
My bookshelves (and all my DVD's - much to every house guests dismay) are arranged by colour. I have a photographic memory- so I know exactly what I'm looking for and where.
While I understand the aesthetic appeal of arranging by color, the librarian inside me absolutely loathes that method. (I both go "Ooo" and cringe whenever I see a book shelf done that way.)
My fiction section is arranged alphabetically by author, and my non-fiction section is arranged by Dewey decimal system.
Mmm, stacked... I think I'm going to rearrange my small collection of books this weekend. I'll admit that I only put the prettiest books on display (by color and size), while the pulp paperbacks, etc, are hidden in a closet. I cull them frequently and only keep the books I love/refer to frequently. My pile of library books is high, though (as is my current fine balance).
I really don't get the backlash against organizing the books by color. It's not like a public library where strangers need to be able to find a certain book.
I have my DVD collection organized by studio because it looks more uniform on the shelf and the world has continued to spin.
I really don't get the backlash against organizing the books by color. It's not like a public library where strangers need to be able to find a certain book.
I have my DVD collection organized by studio because it looks more uniform on the shelf and the world has continued to spin.
Genre. And size. (My shelves are adjustable, so tall gardening books go on one shelf and short ones on another, to conserve total space.)
I'm a librarian, and although *I* wouldn't go there, I do know a couple of librarians who actually use the Dewey decimal system at home. (Too much work in my view!)
I don't keep books when I realize I no longer use them, and I have a terrible memory -- I usually know I have (or "had!") a book, but I need a system to be able to find it. If you remember your books by color, that might work for you, but it never would for me. And being able to locate the book you want is a critical factor in owing them, in my opinion.
Another librarian here. I don't go so far as to arrange my non-fiction by Dewey number, but I do organize my books by genre and then by authors last name within each genre. I like knowing exactly where to find each book should I decide I absolutely must read it right away. ;-)
yup, genre for me too. after genre, it's grouping like sub-sections, or whichever books fit well on the shelf space available. :)
I admit that color looks nice, but I couldn't stand it (series would be broken up! the horror!). Plus, am I really the only one who has many many books with more than one color on the spine? I'm going to try it with my cookbooks though, since they live in the kitchen and there aren't that many of them.
But I am currently struggling the with organization problem. After my last move, when I finally got the bookcases up, I just stacked books willynilly because I didn't have enough shelves. I now have more shelves and am beginning to organize. Fiction is alphabetical by author, but divided into contemporary (living authors) and not (dead ones). Graphic novels--and nonfiction like Maus--get their own section, again alphabetical. Poetry is alphabetical by author, with a shelf for anthologies by period or subject. I don't follow any particular logic for any author's books; they are arranged usually according to size and yes, sometimes color, to the most pleasing effect.
But general nonfiction is killing me. I'm considering the Dewey decimal system.
But nonfiction is
Our books are arranged by theme, but they are also arranged by size. I like having straight lines across the tops (or down the sides if the books in question are stacked) instead of having the books look like a mountain range. It calms the visual clutter a little.
Alphabetical is great for finding a book on someone else's shelf, when I might know an author or title but not what the book looks like, but my system works for me.
Oh, how I wish AT had an edit function. :-(
I'm a history nerd, so my non-fiction is arranged by country/region and then chronologically. My fiction is more organic - arranged by author, but favorite up high and less-favorite as you go down.
i have mine organized in many different ways. i have all my black book covers from tallest to smallest, then all my coloured ones on a different shelf from tallest to smallest and all my magazines or large card copy books are stacked. i think i might try completely colour coating them once i have a lot more books. my collection is slacking.
Advanced Color Option #2 is nice. ... I would do that to my uglier books. Usually i keep one book shelf for my favorite books and everything else i rotate out. Eventually getting rid of anything i don't read by donating or giving to family.
I am not a fan of organizing by colour, I think it looks a little gaudy. Plus I would have to have series broken up (like Cassis said).
we have our books organized by genre/alphabetical.
I'm thinking about getting rid of some of my books altogether in favor of a nook or a kindle.
I was always told that stacking books can crush their spines...
Though I guess that wouldn't apply to paperbacks.
General subject area and then grouped by subtopic--so all the cookbooks are together and then grouped by type of cuisine; all the European history together, etc. We have a lot of books (around 3,000 at home and another couple thousand in our offices) so in any given room there tend to be only one or two topics represented--cookbooks are in the dining room and tv room (I love to look at them when watching tv) history is in the living room, gardening in the reading/guest room, etc.
I organize them first per language, and then per category.
So obviously colour wouldn't work for me since i would need to have multiple rainbows (I think it's not practical anyway)
Stacks are inevitable when you have limited space.
I'm a huge reader, have a large collection, and while I once tried to organize by color, it just seemed persnickety to me.
We organized our books by color - mainly because I liked how it looked and we don't really have that many books to begin with.
Exception were the graphic novels -- those are still grouped by series -- and my Harry Potter hardcovers...they had to stay together.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/blogkitten/4891803700/in/set-72157624724247082/
This debate AGAIN?
My books are organized first by genre, then alphabetically by author, except for all the "prettiest" books, which are on their own shelf in the living room. What I am concerned about, now that we are talking about babies, is what on earth do I do with all of our hundreds of books to keep them away from kids that isn't completely infeasible and/or unattractive?
I try to organize my boks by genre and size (taller books on the outside, shorter ones in the middle), but my husband makes that difficult sometimes. Our very full bookshelves get regular use, and while I've thought to try to pretty them up, it just wouldn't be practical for us.
My shelves are sort of a mess. Some are organized by genre/theme (I even have an entire shelf dedicated to Zelda and Scott Fitzgerald), others by size (some books are too tall for certain shelves), and some just by where they fit because I am running out of room. But, I've lived with them like this for four years, so I know where everything is. http://www.flickr.com/photos/queendork/3534714296
There's also a shelf in my bedroom with smaller paperbacks and CDs on it. I can't find any CDs when I want them...but I don't really listen to my CDs much anymore, so I guess it doesn't matter much,.
My fiction and non-fiction are on separate shelves, just like at the library! Fiction is arranged by author, non-fiction by subject. Unlike the library, though, I keep all of the unread books lying flat. I enjoy the visual; it's like a to-do list.
I have lots of books and I loan them out. I organize by author because it makes them easier to find. Also, if I plan on buying a new book, I don't always remember titles so it makes it easier to check so I don't duplicate books.
we organize ours by size, some stand up and some lay on their side. I too, like to see a flat line of books, not a mountain of different heights. better visual appeal. Then again, it is just a small bookcase!
In defense of Dewey:
I have a sizable non-fiction section (2 sets of Billy shelves full), so once I had gotten to the point where I didn't remember what I had or who wrote it, I had to bring out the big guns. Plus I don't have a specific interest (like just history or design). The collection is terribly electic and I couldn't come up with my own consistent organizational system. (And I was tired of buying duplicates.) This works for me ... and it helps me "win" any "How OCD are you?" conversations. ;)
Modified Library of Congress, natch.
Mine are organized by genre (mostly), and if I have a lot of books by one author I try to keep them together (I don't always manage it, though). Hethyr, I was always buying duplicates too (I collect old mysteries), but I joined Goodreads and entered all the old mysteries in my account (and I have a smartphone) and now if I'm in a bookstore and can't remember if I own something, I can easily look it up in my Goodreads account.
I organize by genre, then alphabetical by author, then by chronology since I have a lot of series and a lot of books by the same author.
I'm not at all visual, so not only would I not be able to find my books, I can't identify the subtle gradations of color necessary to execute such an arrangement.
That said, I do have a few stacks hanging around just for looks.
Another librarian here.
I do genre, then alphabetically by author's last name. Some bigger genres I have are broken down into further categories within the genre and also then alphabetically by author.
Fiction and non-fiction separate, natch.
@k1tsun3 - After I organized the monster, I joined LibraryThing and got the barcode scanner that looks like a mouse. The scanner made entering books very easy. It also made me realize just how many books I have (and how many books I'll have in 10, 20, 30 years.)
Ditto to Yvette - I would die without having my Pratchett in the right order. Having culled down to two bookshelves (mostly my college theatre texts on one and then my pleasure reading on the other), it makes life a lot easier, so maybe I could actually think about going by color...but no. The second-grader that lives in the back of my head would be very upset with that. But now I have my Kindle (best Christmas ever), and I've been having to set up some kind of organization on that so I'm not flipping through four pages of titles every time I look for something...
N/A
I've pretty much been moving to digital and have very few hard copy books. I realize many people consider this blasphemous, but I greatly prefer this.
I always hid my books, especially text books because I always felt they looked messy on a shelf. I think the problem was that I never thought to organize them by colour. It is SO visually pleasing and I remember my text by colour rather than title.
Haha! I put my books in a TOTALLY random order that is completely dictated by where I can squeeze in the latest book I bought. Queer theory next to Twilight! Fitzgerald next to Calvin and Hobbes! And I know where everything is! Muahahahahaha.
Hethyr, good for you on joining LibraryThing! I thought about joining LibraryThing, but I'm just not good about getting big projects like that done. I put the mysteries on Goodreads in a bunch and I'll work my way through the rest of the books slowly. Only a couple thousand more to go! Sigh.
I organize my books by publisher - ensures that matched spines and books of a similar size are together.
My books are all photography, interior design, and fashion, and are on the shelves by color.
I have tried organizing my books in so many ways but nothing worked really well until I organized them in chronological order (by subject, so a modern biography of Cicero goes next to Cicero's own writings). I guess I am a nerd!
Great post! I used to keep all of my books (over 600) one several big shelves. When we moved into a larger house several years ago, I moved part of them up to our loft and have the rest in several rooms throughout the house. I find there's always something to read and I rotate them through various rooms often enough to keep things fresh.
But, back to the post - I like to organize by subject and color if possible.
I agree with some of the above comments- if I love a book, I know what my copy looks like. My novels are ALL organized by colour and I love it. I did the same thing in my business... we sell blinds, and at the back have tracks with 3 slats of every vertical available. How can you cover that much space with unsorted colours? Too messy. Organized by colour is much easier on the eyes IMO :)
By genre. And I keep all of one author together but we don't really do by author.
Eventually I will get my butt in gear and cover all my beloved but cruddy paperbacks with matching paper - but they'll have titles/authors so they're findable. Then still sorted by genre and author. I just don't need flourescent .50 cent used paperbacks on display. I still love the books.
Honestly I would have no problem with by colour. I just don't like the look.
I love organizing my books! I group mine based on the period of my life in which I read each book. They do tend to fall naturally into different genres--for instance, I read a lot of poetry in my late teens and was into the McSweeney's scene in my early twenties. There is something intensely personal about a bookcase for me, before I lived in a studio I always kept it in my bedroom.
I keep my lovely books (the old leather bounds, etc.) on an open bookshelf, mostly organized by size and color, with some stacked as bookends.
I keep most of my books behind the glass doors of my dining room built-in. The shelves are adjustable, but have been painted in place, so those books are organized according to where they fit. In retrospect, the left door is 90% non-fiction, and the right door is 90% fiction.
This is really dorky, but I also secretly organize by juxtaposition. I like that Chuck Klosterman is neighbors with Mary Wollstonecraft. I got a tiny thrill letting Marx and Hobbes duke it out next to each other on the shelf.
I adore the organize-by-colour option and would do that in a New York minute if I could... but that would lead to divorce.
The by-color and alphabetically are very tempting, but I'd run into the problem of room. Most of my tpbs are stacked vertically to make room for the hardcovers/oversized pbs.
I need to redo my shelves though. Right now it's a loose 'by genre' configuration, grouped by author, and by size, sort of.
I don't get why people are so horrified at the idea of arranging books by color. If it's just for show, sure, that's ridiculous (I balk at the idea of covering the spines of my books with kraft paper). But I'm a very visual person and that's actually turned out to be the easiest way for me to remember which books are where. I tried doing it chronologically by genre and I just got fed up with it. For reference, I'm in academia so I DO actually use my books!
When living in a shared house I colour coded all of our DVDs on the shelves (they were all together anyway). My housemates thought I'd gone mental. "Whats the point? It doesn't help you find things?" - I just like it. So there.
BY COLORS????!!!!!
Really, only in AT do I see books desecrated in the most absurd ways.....
I have arranged my book by color when my entire book collection had to be displayed in one bookcase in a small room. It was amazing how much calm it brought to the room. I have also broke them up into several bookcases through out the house, grouped by genre. But my fave is a rogue stack in my bedroom in which every book has the word "Love" in the title.
I'm going to organize my books by color and submit to AT just to irk every pretentious academic snob here. ;)
Periodicals and reference books are separate, but the rest are organized alphabetically. If I have more than one book by the same author, they go chronologically by date of publication. Too much? Probs.
My shelving system consists of the Harry Potter series and memorabilia have their own shelf, and every thing else goes where it will fit. The graphic novels and comics do have their own designated section, though.
How about randomly? That's my method. Except for one book on Mondrian, which I have propped up with the cover facing out because I love his art.
Does anyone know who makes the sofa in the stacks and stacks entry?
wow.. arranging by color is kinda cool.. must try that.
so far, my method is to arrange by author
I did my fiction by color at my last apartment, which drove my roommate batty but made me smile. I will probably do that again here, when I finish assembling my bookcases (homemade built-ins are great in theory, but it's been months and they need to just be done already...). My non-fiction will be by genre, at least sort of, but mostly it'll be arranged the way I used to arrange my CDs: my association. If this reminds me of this other thing, then they will naturally go beside one another...
This also irks other people, but it's how my brain works and therefore couldn't be better for me. It means things are sort of sorted by genre, but the genres melt together in a way that seems logical to me.
None of the above? Chronologically by purchase date works for me.
I've got around 1000 books collected over 40 years, and my method involves placing new additions in the next available slot. I fill up one bookcase, then build another. Have yet to move any books out of their original location (except to replace the first couple bookcases I built as I wasn't that good with wood back then.)
I also have an Excel spreadsheet listing all the titles and print that up as needed. I'll do a couple pages of "new additions" and then reprint the whole thing. Last step that helps a lot is I add a number label to the splines. Just got a new book in a series (#976) and looking at my handy dandy spreadsheet, I know I need to pull 698, 631, 582, and 517 to re-read the entire series start to finish.
One bonus with the numbering scheme - I can double stack the books. Running out of room, so the last bunch of shelves I built are double deep and labeled so I know what number series are hiding in the back. I leave a gap in the middle of the front row of books so I can slide those back and forth for grazing ...
I've got very limited bookshelf space. Since I've never read the same novel twice, I always give my fiction away after I've read it. (And, probably half of what I have was given to me by someone else!) Since purchasing an ipad a couple of years ago, I've only purchased ebooks for fiction and for a few non-fiction books. My bookshelves are filled with decorating, travel, yoga, art, and other non-fiction books that I've arranged by theme and height. And that seems to work for me. Organizing by color looks great, but I'd never find anything. It might work for me if they were all covered, but I don't have the time to do it ... so many other projects to tackle!!
Hi Everybody!
I was doing a little search about "organizing books", and because I so enjoyed ALL of your shared thoughts, I registered with this site, just to say *THANKS ALL*!
I don't have a huge number of books; somewhere in the area of 250-300 I'd guess. About 1/4 of which are in boxes; another 1/4 on living room shelves; and the other 1/2 on one shelf next to my desk.
I appreciated the thoughts about sorting by Genre, and then Authors within a Genre, since I basically only read Non-Fiction books, and if there is Fiction, it's Fiction built around a Non-Fiction theme. I own mainly 3 types of books: 1) Earth Sciences, 2) Political Sciences [is it really a science, or am I just calling it that because I've heard the phrase?], and 3) Self-Help items [because I'm fascinated about discovering what I haven't discovered about myself yet, from a total strangers point of view....oh the irony huh?]
As of this typing, my books are arranged by Genre, and Size. Yet to see how it might work, I'm going to consider adding to this mix, sorting by Author.
Now my DVD library, which is next to my desk on another shelf, has a few over 100 items. They are all of the Earth Sciences field of study. I'm unsure yet how to try organizing these. About half of theme are arranged by who produced them. The other half doesn't have enough continuity of producers for it to gel the same way. So for now, those are somewhat arranged by spine color.
Again, Thanks for Everyone's input! Just LOVED reading YOUR comments :D {hope I don't have any typos here}
I almost forgot this:::: On the other side of my desk, are my two shelves of CD's (music only). Because this small library is up to somewhere near 450 discs, I've simply stayed with sorting by Artist and Year of Release....I may not know how to find a specific disc quickly enough if I do it any other way?
~Cheers~